Advanced Search Results

Present: Mr. D.N. Ganeriwala Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 42. It has been further held therein that if the police officer fails to record in writing the information so received or fails to send a copy thereof to the official superior then it will be a … as follows:- “It cannot but be noticed that with the advancement of technology and the availability of high speed exchange of information, some of the … Criminal Appeal No.947-DB of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal … Sarabjit Singh under Section 15 of NDPS Act.5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that Section 42 (2) of the NDPS Act was not complied with by PW6 S.I. Gurbaj Singh.6. Per contra, the learned

National Petroleum Construction Company Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Inc ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

not chargeable to tax under the IT Act, as held 15 by this Court in G E India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax and Another1.37. The High Court rightly held that the question … (2007) 288 ITR408(SC) 3 (2007) 291 ITR482(SC) 17 42. By its letter dated 22nd June 2019, referred … DTAA. This question of fact will have to be determined separately for each assessment year, and we are informed that for AY-2016-17 and AY-2017-18, the determination is presently against the petitioner. We cannot accept the petitioner's contention … However, the returns filed by the Appellant for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, were not accepted by the Assessing Officer, hereinafter referred to as the … for the Financial/Previous Year 2019-20, corresponding to the Assessment Year 2020-21, under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act 1961, hereinafter referred to as the

M/S. Abraham Memorial Educational Trust and Others Vs. C. Suresh Babu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 85 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 149 of the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 47 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) … on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ramanlal Bhailal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (5) SCC 449. wherein, in paragraph 29 of the said judgment the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as … the contrary, according to him, the Legislature has consciously omitted the same. 42. But, this contention, in my considered opinion, deserves only to be rejected

Shaji Poulose Vs. The Institute Of Chartered Accountants Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to note that members, even in the year 1999, were of the view that the objective of calling the information was only to review the limit and not to take disciplinary action and requested the President to suitably … should increase the ceiling limit of tax audits although factors such as the increased permeation of access to technology and consequential increased professional competence of auditors, dynamic and increasing economy, growth of new and specialized areas of … the T.C. (Civil) No.29 of 2021 Etc. 30 appellant on 8th August, 2008 for regulating the business of its members. However, subsequently one of them … the prescribed T.C. (Civil) No.29 of 2021 Etc. 42 professional standards, a mere choice of work could … Whether the Council of the respondent- 89 09 Institute, under the 1949 Act, was competent to impose, by way of Guidelines, a numerical restriction on … could be accepted by a Chartered Accountant, under Section 44AB of the 1961 Act, in a Financial

Kerala Roadways (P) Ltd., vs the Dy. Commissioner of Income

Court : Chennai

law in deleting the addition of Rs.3,99,88,299/- made on account of suppression of freight charges even though Management Information Report sent to the Corporate Office did not tally with those appearing in the regular books of accounts?2.Whether … (3), Chennai 600 034. .. Respondent/Respondent Tax Case Appeal has been filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in I.T.(SS)A.No.87/MDS/2007 for the

Picker India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

the CIT(A) to invoke Section 92 to assessee's case, no particulars, data on comparable transactions, any other relevant information were gathered during the first remand. CIT(A)'s decision to set aside the issue to the file of the … CIT-Departmental Representative filed a copy of the ITO's letter dt. 24th March, 2008 before us stating that the files are not traceable in spite of … guidelines. Further, the CIT(A) is directing the AO to apply the provisions of Section 92 of the IT Act and issuing certain directions in this regard. Finally, other two grounds Nos. 1 and 2 are: 1. That … facts. Issue there is whether an addition could be made under Section 42(2) of IT Act, 1922, when the resident company has charged 'no profits'

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Pride Foramer Sas

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)116TTJ(Delhi)369

Matched in: Citation (2008)116TTJ(Delhi)369

Smriti Achuthan vs the State Represented by

Court : Chennai

offences punishable under Sections 408 and 420 of the IPC and Section 66A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. .. A-5 Smriti Achuthan, joined Pace Automation, an executive assistant to the Chairman and CEO, on 01.06.2009. She … alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 408, 420 of the Indian Penal Code r/w Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and/or any other offence, and thus the Petitioner … including the petitioner herein alleging commission of offence punishable under Sections 408, 420, of IPC r/w. Section 66 of Information Technology Act, 2000, read with

Prajwal Revanna Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

for offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 376(2)(k), 354A, 354B, 354C, 506 of the IPC and Section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act, 2008 and pending before the LXXXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore city, is knocking at the doors … 354(A), 354(B), 354(C) OF IPC AND SEC. 66E OF I.T. ACT, 2008, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XLII ADDL. CMM AT BENGALURU. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON2609.2024, COMING ON FOR