Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the information technology act 2008 section 38 · Page 1 of about 790 results (0.123 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 23 2016

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-23-2016

Subject : Right to Information

by creating a website for users to share their content it was only acting as an “intermediary”, under the Information Technology Act (“IT Act”). It argued that the provisions of the IT Act and Act had to be read harmoniously. … against intermediaries who may themselves post infringing content, intermediaries FAO(OS) 540/2011 Page 38 can seek safe harbor where the content is uploaded by third party … ensure that copyrighted material is taken down from its website as soon as it detected.5. Sometime in January 2008MySpace offered SCIL and other copyright and content owners the option of registering for its Rights Management Tool. Upon … using its content without licence or any authority committed infringing activities under Section 51(a)(i) and 51(a)(ii) of the Copyright Act (hereafter “the Act”).It argued that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2022

National Petroleum Construction Company Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Inc ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-29-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

not chargeable to tax under the IT Act, as held 15 by this Court in G E India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax and Another1.37. The High Court rightly held that the question … DTAA. This question of fact will have to be determined separately for each assessment year, and we are informed that for AY-2016-17 and AY-2017-18, the determination is presently against the petitioner. We cannot accept the petitioner's contention … However, the returns filed by the Appellant for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, were not accepted by the Assessing Officer, hereinafter referred to as the … for the Financial/Previous Year 2019-20, corresponding to the Assessment Year 2020-21, under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act 1961, hereinafter referred to as the … 2007-08 and 2008-09 which is reported in (2016) 383 ITR648 The Delhi High Court analyzed the contract

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax Kolkata Xii Vs. M/S Calcutta Export Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-2018

Subject : Education

40(a)(ia) of IT Act.18) With a view to mitigate this hardship, Section 40(a)(ia) was amended by the Finance Act, 2008 and the provision so amended read as under:-“40. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Sections 30 to 38, … remaining eleven months of the previous year. It was provided that in case of assessees falling under the first category, no disallowance under Section 40(a) (ia) of the IT Act shall be made if the tax deducted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 21 2026

Winzo Games Private Limited vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-21-2026

ROAD, BENGALURU CITY REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 420 OF IPC 1860 AND UNDER SECTION 66C, 66D OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2008. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 23.01.2026, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, … PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2 . AASTHA SOOD W/O. HIMANSHU TEWARY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO. 103, TULIP BLOCK, PRESTIGE EXOTICA, CUNNINGHAM CRESCENT ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 051. ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2018

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2018

Subject : Right to Information

shall be deemed to be “electronic record” and “sensitive personal data or information”, and the provisions contained in the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000) and the rules made thereunder shall apply to such information, in addition to, and … ten thousand rupees. In the case of a company, this fine can extend to one lakh rupees. Likewise, Section 38 provides for penalty for unauthorised access to the CIDR. Penalties for tampering with data in CIDR (Section39) and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2015

J. Jayalalitha and Others Vs. State, By the Superintendent of Police, ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-11-2015

Subject : Criminal

from a lower middle class agricultural family, and who was in Government Service from 1976 to 1991 in the Information Department. He was once removed from services and reinstated without back wages and their only source of income … the Appellant/Accused No.1 for the Offence Punishable Under Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and Under Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code read with Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2022

Commissioner Of Service Tax Delhi Vs. Quick Heal Technologies Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-05-2022

Subject : Service Tax

is registered with the Service Tax Commissioner, Pune­III for providing taxable services, inter alia, under the category of “Information Technology Software 2 Service”. The assessee is engaged in the development of Quick Heal brand Antivirus Software which is … to use of tangible goods service has also been brought under the service tax net by the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 16.05.2008 vide notification No.18/2008­ST, 35 dated 10.05.2008 whereby taxable service has been defined under Section … due consideration of the same, it recorded the following findings in para 38:­ “38. A perusal of the aforesaid guidelines would indicate that after making

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 2016

M/s. Manyata Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Authorized Signat ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-25-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

a Circular dated 28.5.2015 clarifying the position regarding imposition of rate of tax on the buildings utilized by the Information Technology and Biotechnology Companies having "Central Air Conditioning Facility" coming under industrial estate in terms of Section 108-A(17) of … circumstances, deemed acceptance of tax is not extendable to the petitioner's case. 38. It is also the contention of the petitioner that re assessment has … present writ petition are as follows: (i) Petitioner is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 which is engaged in real estate development. The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board had allotted and lease … of Rs.9,60,70,489/- as annual difference tax together with interest and penalty from 2008-09 till date and quash the order dated 24.8.2015 at Annexure-B passed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2025

Vijay Krishnaswami @ Krishnaswami Vijayakumar versus the Deputy Direct ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2025

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2199

imposed on the Revenue, to be paid to the appellant. [Paras 36, 38] Income Tax Act, 1961 - s.276C - Wilful attempt to evade tax, … classifying excisable goods uniformly. The whole objective of such circulars is to adopt a uniform practice and to inform the trade as to how a particular product will be treated for the purposes of excise duty. It … Maheshwari* and Vijay Bishnoi, JJ.]Issue for ConsiderationWhether continuation of the prosecution initiated by the revenue u/s.276C(1), Income Tax Act, 1961 against the appellant after passing an order by the Settlement Commission, would amount to abuse of process … 1961; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975 (41 of 1975). List of Keywords Section 276C(1), Income Tax Act, 1961; Proviso to sub-section(1) to Section 245H, Income

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 2012

M/S. Shakti Commercial Premises Society Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra, ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-11-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 100% additional FSI to the plots, initially alloted for some other purpose but subsequently use changed for Information Technology. Even the Vice Chairman and Managing Director of CIDCO wrote letter dated 23rd January, 2009 to the Principal … the Manager (Town Services) of CIDCO, by his letter dated 25th June, 2008, informed the petitioner-Society that CIDCO may change the user of said land … in exercise of powers under Section 37(1) read with Section 154 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to 'said Act'), directed CIDCO and Corporation to initiate modification to include the Regulation as … any tangible reason whatsoever. Further, reliance placed by the Authority on clauses 38(H) and 46.1(A) of GDCR (NMMC) 1994 was completely inapposite. The Authority, in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial