Advanced Search Results

Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. Vs. Etisalat DB Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the promoter (then RADAG) while applying for 2G licenses. On a change in the Telecom Policy permitting dual technology (GSM+CDMA), RADAG sold Swan to Balwa and Goenka. According to the Petitioner, the CBI charge-sheet describes how Balwa … 9.90 per cent shares were held by Delphi. 3.7 On 10th January, 2008, Letters of Intent for the grant of Unified Access Services Licenses (‘2G … in the scheme. The scheme is devoid of any specifics or details. Till date there has been no information/detail on the names of the ‘potential investors as envisaged in the scheme. As submitted by the Petitioner, it … Ltd. (“the Company”) was incorporated on 13th July, 2006 under the Companies Act, 1956, in the name of Swan Capital Pvt. Ltd. On 15th February, … July, 2011, Respondent No.2/Majestic filed a Petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act before … to Companies of Mauritius. The Petitioner is a 100 per cent subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation (“Etisalat”),

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Concord Pharmaceuticals

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 37(4), 90, 90(2), 119, 253(2), 260A, 263, 268A, 268A(1), 268A(4), 268A(5) and 275(1); Finance Act, 2008; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3(1A) and 60; Income Tax Rules - Rule 47; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963 - Rules 6 to 15

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Guj)117; [2009]317ITR395(Guj)

Matched in: Citation (2008)220CTR(Guj)117; [2009]317ITR395(Guj)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Oscar Laboratories (P) Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(P& H)546

High Court or Special Benches of Tribunal should be communicated to this centre every fortnight so that this information is available to all other charges, and there is uniformity in the approach of the Department in different … were granted statutory status with the insertion of Section 268A into the IT Act, 1961, by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1999. The second contention advanced by the learned Counsel for the respondent-assessee … were laying down laving down monentary limits of revenue effect of Rs. 10,000 for filing appeals before Tribunal, Rs. 30,000 for reference before High Court

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … from regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of … the said Accused No.1 confirmed having sold SUHAGRA-100 Tablets (Sildenafil Citrate Tablets 100 mg), during the Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 8 & Crl.P. No.4712

Kerala Roadways (P) Ltd., vs the Dy. Commissioner of Income

Court : Chennai

law in deleting the addition of Rs.3,99,88,299/- made on account of suppression of freight charges even though Management Information Report sent to the Corporate Office did not tally with those appearing in the regular books of accounts?2.Whether … (3), Chennai 600 034. .. Respondent/Respondent Tax Case Appeal has been filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in I.T.(SS)A.No.87/MDS/2007 for the … three appeals under consideration, T.C.(Appeal) No: 373/2009 isby the Assessee: T.C.(Appeal) No: 1026/2009 and T.C.(Appeal)No.274/2014 are by the Revenue. Since the facts and law involved

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of Section 79 Information Technology Act, 2000, … from regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of … the said Accused No.1 confirmed having sold SUHAGRA-100 Tablets (Sildenafil Citrate Tablets 100 mg), during the Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 8 & Crl.P. No.4712

Sri Siva Rama Krishna Chennuboina Vs. Mr Sasi Narkis Babu V

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

question registration of crime in Crime No.12 of 2021 for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66(F), 84(C) of the Information Technology Act, 2008 (‘the Act’ for short) and Section 380 of the IPC and pending before the 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan … Defence, Government of India were entrusted to the Indian Institute of Science viz., “Experimental Investigation of Lateral Instability 10 Characteristics of AMCA at Moderate to High Angles of Attack-Phase-I”. The project was sanctioned and was sought to

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electronics (DoE) with the support of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The program was focused on integrating information technology and internet tools with learning environment, to enhance the quality of education. However, funding by the UNDP ended … exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) ................................................ 21 II. Submissions of parties ................................................................................................................................. 22 A. Arguments on behalf of the revenue.......................................................................................................... 22

M/s. Manyata Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Authorized Signat ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

a Circular dated 28.5.2015 clarifying the position regarding imposition of rate of tax on the buildings utilized by the Information Technology and Biotechnology Companies having "Central Air Conditioning Facility" coming under industrial estate in terms of Section 108-A(17) of … directing the payment of difference amount calculating the property tax at Rs. 10 per sq. ft., based on the notification dated 21.12.2012 issued by R-2 … present writ petition are as follows: (i) Petitioner is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 which is engaged in real estate development. The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board had allotted and lease … of Rs.9,60,70,489/- as annual difference tax together with interest and penalty from 2008-09 till date and quash the order dated 24.8.2015 at Annexure-B passed by

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shubhash Traders,

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(MP)372

rendered by the Bombay High Court, in CIT v. Grasim Industries Ltd. IT Appeal (L) No. 3592 of 2008. [reported at (2009) 225 CTR (Bom) 127: Ed.] The learned Counsel has commended us to para 6 of … In that context, it has been held as follows:8. There is yet another good reason for insisting that right of preemption must be exercised within the period specified under Section 8 of the Act so that the … in Vidyacharan Shukla v. Khubchand Baghel and Ors. : AIR 1964 SC 1099. The learned senior counsel has specifically drawn our attention to para 26