Advanced Search Results

Koshy Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 65, 66, 66(1), 66(2) and 77B; ;Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83 and 438; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 419 and 420

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT945

offences alleged, going by Annexure A First Information Report, are under Sections 65 and 66(1) and (2) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. After hearing all the counsel and the learned Additional Advocate General of the State of Punjab, it is … that the offence under Sections 65 and 66 of the Information Technology Act is bailable in view of Section 77B of the Information Technology Act. Section 77B was introduced by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (Act 10

Credit Suisse Securities (Usa) Llc Vs. Billing

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

in a process that the industry calls “book building.” During this time, the underwriters and firm representatives present information to investors about the company and the stock. And they attempt to gauge the strength of the investors’ … App. 1, 14. The investors stated that between March 1997 and December 2000 the banks had acted as underwriters, forming syndicates that helped execute the … underwriters, violated antitrust laws when they formed syndicates to help execute initial public offerings (IPOs) for several hundred technology-related companies. Respondents claim that the underwriters unlawfully agreed that they would not sell newly issued securities to a … June 18, 2007 Respondent investors filed suit, alleging that petitioner investment banks, acting as underwriters, violated antitrust laws when they formed syndicates to help execute … and remedies existing outside of the securities laws. Section 16 of the Securities Act of 1933 states