Advanced Search Results

K. Ramajayam @ Appu Vs. The Inspector of Police, T-4, Maduravoyal Poli ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

- Section 3, Section 25, Section 114, Section 45, Section 45A, section 76, Section 62, Section 65B - Information Technology Act, 2000- Section 2, Section 2(t), Section 2, Section 79A - Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - burglary and murder €“

Smt Shaila Chebbi Govind Vs. The State of Karnataka By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

Mala Srinivas Gouda, alleging offences punishable under Sections 65, 66 (B) , 71 , 73 and 74 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IT Act, 2000’, for brevity) and Sections 465, 468, 469, 471, 474, 476 … served) ***** These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash the complaint and FIR in Crime No.76/2016

Shaila Chebbi Govind and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka by The Prin ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Chebbi and Mala Srinivas Gouda, alleging offences punishable under Sections 65, 66 (B), 71, 73 and 74 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the IT Act, 2000 , for brevity) and Sections 465, 468, 469, 471, 474, … (Prayers: These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash the complaint and FIR in Crime No.76/2016

Swami Ramdev & Anr. Vs.facebook, Inc. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

with the Rules are relevant. The same are extracted below: CS (OS) 27/2019 Page 63 of 76 The Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 2(j) ―computer network means the interconnection of one or more computers through- (i) the use of satellite, microwave,

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1. the Director General of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

11 have committed offences under Sections 66 B, 66 E, 72, 72 A r/w. 76 and 77 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 109, 379, 403, 420, 468, 470, 471 along with 120 (b) of IPC. The intellectual property … the statement given by the writ petitioner would not make out an offence under the above said provisions.22. Section 76 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 deals with Confiscation of the computer, computer system, floppies, compact disks, tape

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361

ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89,

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the statement given by the writ appellant would not make out an offence under the above said provisions.19. Section 76 of the Information technology Act 2000 deals with Confiscation of the computer, computer system, floppies, compact disks, tape … both. The averments in the complaint and his statement would not make out an offence u/s 66B of the Information technology Act 2000. Section 66E of the Information technology Act 2000 deals with punishment for violation of privacy. Whoever, intentionally or knowingly

Shamraj Moorjani Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Hyd.)927

against separate but identical orders of the CIT(A)-II, Hyderabad, dt. 27th Oct., 2000, IT(SS)A No. 31/Hyd/2000 is filed by a partnership firm consisting of three … enable him to pay the tax. It was also stated in the said letter that the Dy. CIT informed them that necessary permission would be given for selling the property and directed them to search for purchasers. … paid the taxes as per the admitted income, by invoking the provisions of Section 249(4)(a) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case are as follows.3. Shri Shamraj Moorjani, Shri Devraj Moorjani and Shri Vishnukumar … case of Bharat Kumar Saksaria v. Dy. CIT (2002) 77 TTJ (Mumbai) 769 : (2002) 82 ITD 512 (Mumbai), which is in favour of the

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. CochIn Malabar Estates and

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Coch.)434

No. 177/Coch/2003), the CIT(A) has held as under: The AO issued notice under Section 148 on 2nd March, 2000 for the similar reasons as in the asst. yr. 1987-88. The AO thereafter completed the assessment under Section … 1. The order of the CIT(A) in ITA Nos. 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 and 78/DC/R-1/CIT-II/2002-03 dt. 16th Dec., 2002 is opposed to law, weight … prescribed under the Act. Hence, in our opinion, considering the facts and materials on record, the CIT(A) is right in declaring all the assessment orders for all the assessment years under consideration as invalid, and hence we

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Enron Oil and Gas India Ltd.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(Uttranchal)411

and no loss was incurred by the company/assessee ?In IT Appeal No. 76 of 2007-Whether, Tribunal erred in law in upholding the decision of CIT(A) … business consisting of the prospecting for or extraction or production of mineral oils in relation to which the Central Government has entered into an agreement with any person for the association or participation of the Central Government … circumstances of the case, in allowing foreign exchange loss of Rs. 11,58,44,887 under Section 42 of the IT Act, 1961, without appreciating the fact that the loss is only a book entry and no loss was incurred … ITA No. 1823/2005 and ITA No. 1824/2005, relating to asst. yrs. 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 1998-99, respectively, whereby the depreciation on account of foreign exchange loss