Advanced Search Results

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). The learned Magistrate then seeks status report from the hands … allegation. On 09-11-2024, the crime in Crime No.876 of 2024 comes to be registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). … accusedpersons clearly disclose commission of several cognizable offences inter alia under Sections 75, 79, 356 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ("BNS") and Sections 67

Sri. Chandrashekar B vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

in Crime No.69/2025 filed by the respondent - Police for the offences punishable under Section 67, 66(C) of Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short IT Act) and under Section 351(3), 352, 75(3), 351(2) and 79 read with 3(5) of the

Arun T a vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Sections 64, 78, and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNS”) and Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short "IT Act") against the petitioner (Accused No.1) and others.3. It is alleged that the complainant becameacquainted … FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE ARISING OUT OF FIR DATED 29.05.2025 IN CR.NO.227/2025 REGISTERED FOR THE O/P/U/S 75 AND 78 OF THE BNSS AND SEC. 66(E) OF THE I.T ACT PENDING BEFORE THE XLI ACMM COURT,

Arjun Malhotra Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)84TTJ(Delhi)269

preferential shares was done on 25th Aug., 1997, except the book entries in their own record. According to Section 75 of the Companies Act, 1956 the assessee is required to file a return of allotment of shares stating … 1997.4. In response to summons under Section 131 the Deutsche Bank vide letter dt. 17th March, 2001, has informed the AO that the shares were pledged by Shri Arjun Malhotra, the assessee, as security for a loan

Shamraj Moorjani Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Hyd.)927

against separate but identical orders of the CIT(A)-II, Hyderabad, dt. 27th Oct., 2000, IT(SS)A No. 31/Hyd/2000 is filed by a partnership firm consisting of three … enable him to pay the tax. It was also stated in the said letter that the Dy. CIT informed them that necessary permission would be given for selling the property and directed them to search for purchasers. … paid the taxes as per the admitted income, by invoking the provisions of Section 249(4)(a) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case are as follows.3. Shri Shamraj Moorjani, Shri Devraj Moorjani and Shri Vishnukumar … returns of income on 11th Oct., 1999, declaring net income of Rs. 75,16,763. The tax payable on this income returned amounted to Rs. 43,12,708, i.e.,

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

and protection of children; (l) declare “fit persons”; (m) declare a child legally free for adoption; (n) keep information about and take necessary follow-up action in respect of missing children in their jurisdiction; Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 … the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … banks, the high courts had rightly treated the Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 75 Companies Act as a general statute and the Recovery of Debts Act,

Pramodh K vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

IN CRIME NO.30/2025 OF CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 67, 66(C) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 AND SECTION 351(2), 351(3), 352, 75(1)(iv), 79 OF BNS 2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 45TH ACJM

Fathima a.S. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

4 15 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,2012 ('POCSO Act') and under Section 67B(d) of the Information Technology Act,2000 (I.T.Act). Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is also alleged against

Agrawal Farm Equipments Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)85TTJJab723

Instruction No. 1967, dt. 7th June, 1999 and 1984 dt. 9th June, 2000 (common for all 3 years). 2. That the learned CIT(A) was not … nature and requires no adjudication. Hence, this ground is rejected.6. At the very outset of the arguments, regarding first ground, the learned counsel for the assessee submitted that IT Department has issued Instruction No. 1967, dt. 7th … dt. 21st Jan., 2002 for the asst. yrs. 1995-96, 1996-97 and 1997-98 under Section 143(3)/147 of the IT Act 1961.2. Since the issues involved in all the appeals are more or less the same and arise out … as gross profit shown by assessee is Rs. 81,726 and not Rs. 75,232. The learned Authorised Representative of the assessee drew my attention to page

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(17); Parliament Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154; Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

the form of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … report was under consideration of the Assembly. This document could not be treated as a public document under Section 75 of the Evidence Act read with Section 2(17)(g) and (h) of the Code of Civil Procedure. This view