Advanced Search Results

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)97TTJ(Ahd.)985

148 and in that context their Lordships of the Gujarat High Court held that there was no new information but only a change of opinion. The assessee had disclosed the material to the AO who was satisfied … not affect its taxability in any way. The company could not claim any relief under Section 70 or Section 71 since its business had not started and there could not be any computation of business income or loss … gains from cancellation of forward exchange contracts was of revenue nature. The action of the AO in reducing the value of block of assets was

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

and protection of children; (l) declare “fit persons”; (m) declare a child legally free for adoption; (n) keep information about and take necessary follow-up action in respect of missing children in their jurisdiction; Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 … the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … is a special Act dealing with a specific Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 71 subject, namely with conditions of service, enumerated in the Schedule, of workmen

income Tax Officer Vs. Bir Engg. Works [Alongwith Misc.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)94ITD164(Asr.)

necessary in the public interest so to do, be published and circulated in the prescribed manner for genera! information; (b) the Board may, if it considers it desirable or expedient so to do for avoiding genuine hardship … should not be filed if the tax effect was less than Rs. 2000. For appeals arising from income-tax, such monetary limit was fixed at Rs. … 1. In exercise of the powers vested under Section 255(3) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred as the Act), the President of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (in short ITAT) has constituted … computation of relief under Section 80M involving question of interpretation of Section 71(2) is a debatable question, and, therefore, it was not mistake apparent from

Abhishek Mishra vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

P/U/S 354-D, 354-C, 504, 506, 509 OF IPC AND SEC.3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT 1989 AND SEC.66-E OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (ANNEXURE-D) AND ETC.,THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 25.06.2025, COMING ON FOR … SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL.SPP FOR R-1; SRI M.B.RAVI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 ) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OFCR.P.C., PRAYING TO 1. QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SPL.C.NO.1029/2024 PENDING ON THE FILES OF THE COURT

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Fertilizer Traders [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(All.)473

entries of two sets and gave the copies of printsout. It is necessary to mention that as per information supplied by the counsel for the assessee, the position of the regular returns of both the assessees are … on facts in upholding the validity of the order dt. 4th Oct., 2000 that had been passed earlier by the Dy. CIT, Central Circle, Gorakhpur … The relevant portion of the reply appears in the paper book-II p. 71 and is reproduced below : Reg.: M/s Fertiliser Traders and Saraf Trading … against different orders of the CIT(A)-I, Kanpur dt. 14th Aug., 2002 passed under Section 158BC/154 of the IT Act, 1961.3. In both the cases of the assessees, undisclosed income was computed and thereafter it was bifurcated in

XXXXXX vs Sri. Balamanjunathaswamiji

Court : Karnataka

FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 4, 6, 11(iv) AND 12 OF POCSO ACT, 2012, SECTION 66(E) AND 67(A) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2000, SECTION 376, 354(A)(1)(i), 354(A)(1)(ii), 417, 342, 506 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC SECTION 3 OF RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS (PREVENTION OF … taken up together and considered by this common order.2. Heard in Criminal Petition Nos. 8786 of 2024 and 71 of2025 Sri Sandesh J.Chouta, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri B.N.Jagadesha, learned State Public Prosecutor for

Swami Ramdev & Anr. Vs.facebook, Inc. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

with the Rules are relevant. The same are extracted below: CS (OS) 27/2019 Page 63 of 76 The Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 2(j) ―computer network means the interconnection of one or more computers through- (i) the use of satellite, microwave, … and of 15 September 2016, McFadden, C‑484/14, EU:C:2016:689, paragraph 96). … CS (OS) 27/2019 Page 56 of 76 71. It is for the referring court to ascertain whether, also having regard to the recent changes made to

Shri Rama Multi Tech Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)92TTJ(Ahd.)568

almost the same as appearing at pp. 227 and 227A of the paper book. The AO neither disputed the information furnished above nor called for any further information. Therefore, the basic information of the said claim was before … in law and on facts in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 9,94,421 claimed under Section 35D of the Act. 6. The learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in not considering the additional ground of … against the order of CIT(A), dt. 5th March, 2004, for asst. yr. 2000-01. Since the assessee is the same and some of the issues involved … the case of CIT v. Alembic Glass Industries Ltd., (1976) 103 ITR 715 (Guj) for allowing the interest on borrowed capital as revenue expenses. The

Picker India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

the CIT(A) to invoke Section 92 to assessee's case, no particulars, data on comparable transactions, any other relevant information were gathered during the first remand. CIT(A)'s decision to set aside the issue to the file of the … are against the order of the CIT(A)-XXIX, New Delhi dt. 14th July, 2000. There are six grounds in the appeal of the assessee. Grounds 3 … resident assessee as held in the cases of Kusum Products Ltd. (1993) 71 Taxman 611 (Cal) and Slocum Investment (P) Ltd. us. Dy. CIT (2006) … guidelines. Further, the CIT(A) is directing the AO to apply the provisions of Section 92 of the IT Act and issuing certain directions in this regard. Finally, other two grounds Nos. 1 and 2 are: 1. That

Smt Shaila Chebbi Govind Vs. The State of Karnataka By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

Mala Srinivas Gouda, alleging offences punishable under Sections 65, 66 (B) , 71 , 73 and 74 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IT Act, 2000’, for brevity) and Sections 465, 468, 469, 471, 474, 476 … served) ***** These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash the complaint and FIR in Crime No.76/2016