Advanced Search Results
A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police
Chennai
Apr-04-2014
Land Acquisition
of investigation, filed charge sheet against the accused for the offences under sections 66, 70 and 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter shortly referred to as old Act) on 12.11.2008. Simultaneously, departmental disciplinary proceedings was initiated and the same … exclusive use of S.K.Upadhyay, IPC, Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption dishonestly from the computer have committed an offence under Section 70 of the Information Technology act. (iii)the petitioner/accused by being instrumental for the publication of the conversation between Tr.S.K.Upadhyay
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFiros Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
May-24-2006
Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights
Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34
AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)
J.B. Koshy, J.1. Appellant/petitioner approached this Court for declaring that Section 70 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is unconstitutional and unenforceable and also for issuance of a writ of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jul-10-2003
Direct Taxation
(2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361
in a particular year was Rs. 100 and the company was having a carry forward loss of Rs. 70 After adjusting the above Rs. 70, the company shall be liable to pay tax on the balance of … ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India
Sep-26-2018
Right to Information
Prior to the enactment of the Aadhaar Act, the Aadhaar project was governed by the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides for punishment for disclosure of information in breach of law … of fake and duplicate beneficiaries into any welfare scheme; b. Other methods which were employed over the last 70 years to check duplication, siphoning of money in welfare schemes, large-scale tax evasion, generation of black money, and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.
Supreme Court of India
Jun-03-2016
Right to Information
made, FIR No.24/2012 under Section 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) was registered against the petitioners by Cyber Police Headquarters, Bhopal, M.P. The respondent no.2, … in the case diary. No notice has been sent to the old woman Smt. Gulshan Johar (aged about 70 years), nor has she played any role in committing any offence. Only the draft of Rs.2.50 lakh had
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Fertilizer Traders [Alongwith
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Feb-13-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)83TTJ(All.)473
entries of two sets and gave the copies of printsout. It is necessary to mention that as per information supplied by the counsel for the assessee, the position of the regular returns of both the assessees are … on facts in upholding the validity of the order dt. 4th Oct., 2000 that had been passed earlier by the Dy. CIT, Central Circle, Gorakhpur … against different orders of the CIT(A)-I, Kanpur dt. 14th Aug., 2002 passed under Section 158BC/154 of the IT Act, 1961.3. In both the cases of the assessees, undisclosed income was computed and thereafter it was bifurcated in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWipro Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Jun-21-2005
Direct Taxation
(2005)96TTJ(Bang.)211
Explanation to Section 80HHE of the IT Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the CBDT hereby specifies the following information technology enabled products or services, as the case may be, for the purpose of said clauses, namely : includes … if a business is discontinued during a year, loss cannot be disallowed.There is no such prohibitive condition under Section 70 of the IT Act.Consequently, the assessee is entitled to seek set off of operating loss as business loss … 111, Mount Road, 98/2761 Guindy, Chennai-600Pune Wipro Ltd., CTS, 685/2B STP/P/VIII(A) 10-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Gurgaon Wipro Ltd., Flat No.201, PCMG/PSE/5 19-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Mysore -- -- --
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWipro Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Jun-21-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)5SOT805(Bang.)
2,3 & 4, Plot Nos. 72 & 73, KEONICS Electronics City, Bangalore-561 229 ITPL, 5th & 6th Floors, Information Technology Park, Whitefield Road, Bangalore-560 066 Wipro Ltd., Flat No. 201, Block A STP Complex, Electronic City, Sector 18, … a business is discontinued during a year, loss cannot be disallowed. There is no such prohibitive condition under section 70 if the IT Act. Consequently the assessee is entitled to seek set off of operating loss as business … No. STP/P/VIII(A)/ 270/2000/2459, dated 19-9-2000.3. STPI, Bangalore-Letter No. STPIB/WIPRO Systems /Expan / 2000051901 / 2053 dated 20-52000.6. Letter dated 19-8-1998 of Under Secretary, Government of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPicker India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Apr-11-2008
Direct Taxation
Neena Syal v. Asstt. CIT (2000) 69 TTJ (Chd) 516 : (1999) 70 ITD (Chd) 62. CIT(A) should decide the matter one way or other … the CIT(A) to invoke Section 92 to assessee's case, no particulars, data on comparable transactions, any other relevant information were gathered during the first remand. CIT(A)'s decision to set aside the issue to the file of the … are against the order of the CIT(A)-XXIX, New Delhi dt. 14th July, 2000. There are six grounds in the appeal of the assessee. Grounds 3 … guidelines. Further, the CIT(A) is directing the AO to apply the provisions of Section 92 of the IT Act and issuing certain directions in this regard. Finally, other two grounds Nos. 1 and 2 are: 1. That
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwami Ramdev & Anr. Vs.facebook, Inc. & Ors.
Delhi
Oct-23-2019
Right to Information
with the Rules are relevant. The same are extracted below: CS (OS) 27/2019 Page 63 of 76 The Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 2(j) ―computer network means the interconnection of one or more computers through- (i) the use of satellite, microwave, … Ramdev, ISBN No.9789386228383 in any manner,- until they delete the following : - (a) At Pages 69 to 70, Chapter 9 Mystery 1 : The Ally‘s Murder (Entire Chapter 9). "A day after the Asian tsunami swept
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »