Advanced Search Results

Dhan Hind Utility Private Limited vs the Police Head Constable

Court : Kerala

BY RESPONDENT NO. 1 UNDER SECTIONS 91 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AND SECTION 67C OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 26.09.2023 ALONG WITH ATTACHMENT ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO. 3

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

in electronic records.13. It is now necessary to set out the relevant provisions of the Evidence Act and the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 3 of the Evidence Act defines “document” as follows: “Document.-- "Document" means any matter expressed or described upon … applied, in criminal trials, till appropriate directions are issued under relevant terms of the applicable licenses, or under Section 67C of the Information Technology Act, which reads as follows: “67C. Preservation and retention of information by intermediaries.- (1)

Shreya Singhal Vs. U.O.I.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

over the internet is included within its reach. It will be useful to note that Section 2(v) of Information Technology Act, 2000 defines information as follows: "2. Definitions.-(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (v) "Information" includes data, … that it has given rise to new forms of crimes - is incorrect, and that Sections 66B to 67C and various Sections of the Indian Penal Code (which will be referred to hereinafter) are good enough to