Advanced Search Results
Sasidharan M.G. vs Union of India
Kerala
Jun-15-2022
the other publishers of content in cable television networks and the internet (including the intermediaries as defined under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and private persons) on the proper use and publication of images/ audio and video; ii. to issue a … of cyber terrorism. The relevant provisions are summarized below:Provisions Offences covered Section 66E Punishment for violation of Privacy Section 66F Punishment for Cyber Terrorism Section 67 Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form Section 67
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMehid Masroor Biswas Vs. The State of Karnataka, By Gangammanagudi Pol ...
Karnataka
Jan-05-2017
Right to Information
Bangalore City against this petitioner in Crime No.218 of 2014 for the offences punishable under Section 66(F) of Information Technology Act, 2000; under Section 125 of the Indian Penal Code; and under Sections 18, 13, 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) … and 505 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(1)(b), 18B, 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, and Section 66F of Information Technology, Act.) 1. Case has been registered by Gangammana Gudi Police Station of Yeswanthpura Sub-Division, Bangalore
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwami Ramdev & Anr. Vs.facebook, Inc. & Ors.
Delhi
Oct-23-2019
Right to Information
with the Rules are relevant. The same are extracted below: CS (OS) 27/2019 Page 63 of 76 The Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 2(j) ―computer network means the interconnection of one or more computers through- (i) the use of satellite, microwave, … contraventions as contemplated under the Act are provided for in Sections 43, 43A, 66A, 66B, 66 66E and Section 66F. However, defamation is not covered in these provisions. Reliance is also placed on the decision in Playboy v.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Niyas Kuttassery vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Apr-13-2023
of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiyas Kuttassery vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Apr-13-2023
of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiyas Kuttassery, vs State of Kerala,
Kerala
Apr-13-2023
of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiyas Kuttassery vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Apr-13-2023
of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiyas Kuttassery vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Apr-13-2023
of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiyas Kuttassery, vs State of Kerala,
Kerala
Apr-13-2023
of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sections 65, 43(a), (b), (f), (g),(i) r/w 66, 66F (1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.4. The prosecution case in all cases is identical. It isalleged that the applicant with criminal intention conspired … R D E RDated this the 13th day of April, 2023 All these bail applications are filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. The applicant is accused No.5 in Crime Nos.320/2021
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSumit Kumar Singh vs Union of India
Kerala
Jun-17-2022
under Ss.120B, 201, 380, 454, 461, read with 34 of the Penal Code, as also, under S.66F(1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Two separate Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions bearing nos.179/2021 and respectively, before the Special Court seeking discharge.In Cr.M.P.No.180/2021, A1 contented … Drives (SSDs), Processors & 4GB Random Access Memory (RAM)2 Second Week CPU of MFC-29 2 RAMs of July, Section Base at 1 Processor & 2019 5Q Ring 1 256 GB SSD withdata3 Last week MFC-22 in 4R
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »