Advanced Search Results

Neha Rafiq Chachadi Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Right to Information

case.6. In view of the rival contentions of the parties, this Court perused the material on record meticulously.7. Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000 reads as under:"66E. Punishment for violation of privacy Whoever, intentionally or knowingly … No.21/2019 on 02.10.2019 - 3 - NC:2023. KHC-D:6526 CRL.P No.102165 of 2019 for the offence punishable U/sec.66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 3.1 Gist of the complaint averments reveal that the petitioner herein has opened a fake instagram account in

Smt Richa Mishra Vs. The Commissioner Of Police

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

Raipur for offences punishable under Section 498A, 377, 34 of the IPC and Sections 66E and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (‘the Act’ for 7 short). Since all the incidents had happened at Bangalore, the Superintendent of Police, Raipur

Vikram Vincent Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

Raipur for offences punishable under Section 498A, 377, 34 of the IPC and Sections 66E and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (‘the Act’ for 7 short). Since all the incidents had happened at Bangalore, the Superintendent of Police, Raipur

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

both. The averments in the complaint and his statement would not make out an offence u/s 66B of the Information technology Act 2000. Section 66E of the Information technology Act 2000 deals with punishment for violation of privacy. Whoever, intentionally or knowingly captures,

Gopalakrishnan vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

is concerned, at the most, the offences that can be attracted is under Section 66E and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the same arebailable offences. It is further submitted that the petitioner is prepared to abide by any

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

material as an offence, it has specifically said so. In that behalf, our attention is invited to Sections 66E, 67, 67A and 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000. For these reasons, it is submitted that the … Crime Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This

S.STEPHEN Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by

Court : Chennai

of BNS, 2023 Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 and Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Radha For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to

M.Muhammad Bilal Vs The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

offences under Sections 5(1), 6 of the Protection of Child From Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 66E of Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 366 and 506(i) IPC before the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under the POCSO

Moosa Kunnugothi vs the Administrator

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 17 of the Act, 2012 and Sections 66E, 67A and 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (‘Act, 2000’ for short).6. When the charge was read over and explained to the accused, they pleaded not … Crl. Appeal No. 248 of 2023 challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on them for the offences under Sections 363, 366, 366A, 368, 376 2(i) and (n), 506, 109 and 120B of IPC and Sections 4, 6,

Noorjahan Bandaragothi vs Union Territory of Lakshadweep

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 17 of the Act, 2012 and Sections 66E, 67A and 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (‘Act, 2000’ for short).6. When the charge was read over and explained to the accused, they pleaded not … Crl. Appeal No. 248 of 2023 challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on them for the offences under Sections 363, 366, 366A, 368, 376 2(i) and (n), 506, 109 and 120B of IPC and Sections 4, 6,