Advanced Search Results

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

both. The averments in the complaint and his statement would not make out an offence u/s 66B of the Information technology Act 2000. Section 66E of the Information technology Act 2000 deals with punishment for violation of privacy. Whoever, intentionally or knowingly

Madhusudhan K Nagara vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

in the charge sheet without any basis for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 66B and 66C of the Information Technology Act, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner cannot be held to be guilty for the aforesaid … FIR in Cr.No.252/2017 against the petitioner-accused no.1 alleging the offences punishable under sections 66B and 66 C of Information Technology Act r/w Section 420 IPC. … NOWPENDING ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU FOR O/P/U/S 66(B), 66(C) OF I.T ACT, 2000 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,ORDER WAS MADE

Newspace Research and Technologies Private Limited vs the State of Kar ...

Court : Karnataka

monitor investigation in Crime No.1025 of 2024 registered for offences punishable under Sections 66, 66(B) and 66(C) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short) and Sections 318(2), 318(3), and 318(4) of the BNS.2. Heard … Technology Act, 2000 and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which includes Section 84B, Section 43 r/w Section 66, Section 66B of the IT Act, Section 63 of theCopyright act, 1963 and Section 61(2) r/w Section 316(2) of the

Shreya Singhal Vs. U.O.I.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

over the internet is included within its reach. It will be useful to note that Section 2(v) of Information Technology Act, 2000 defines information as follows: "2. Definitions.-(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (v) "Information" includes data, … to Section 67B also provide for various punishments for offences that are clearly made out. For example, under Section 66B, whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen computer resource or communication device is punished with imprisonment. Under Section

Sri Swapnil Rati vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru City for the offences punishable under Sections 66, 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of the Information Technology Act 2000 and Sections 419, 420, 201, 120(B) read with Section149 of IPC.2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and … CITY OF WHITEFIELD CEN CRIME POLICE, BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.29575/ 2022 (CR.NO.453/2022) FOR THE ALLEGED -2- OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 66, 66B, 66C, 66D OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 AND SEC. 419, 420, 201, 120B R/W SEC.149 OF

Sri Swapnil Rati vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 419, 420 read with Section 149 of IPC and Sectionss 66, 66(C)(D) of Information Technology Act, 2000.The Crl.P.No.8708/2022 filed by the petitioner- accused Nos.1, 7, 6, 11 under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing … OF THE I ADDL.CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU CITY IN C.C No.29573/2022 (CR.No.454/2022) FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S 66, 66B, 66C, 66D OF I.T ACT, 2000 AND SECTION 419, 420, 201, 120B, R/W SECTION 149 OF IPC.THIS PETITION,

Vinod D. Gangwal Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Police Station alleging offences punishable under sections 188, 500, 501, 502 of Indian Penal Code, sections 66A and 66B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and sections 23(1)(2)(3) (4) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences … that FIR is concerned, it alleges offence punishable under sections 188, 500, 501, 502, 66A and B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and section 23(1)(2)(3) (4) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. As far as that

Raj Lalit Soni vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

THE FILE OF THE HONBLE XLVII ACJM, BANGALORE,) FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S 66, 66B, 66C, 66D OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000, AND SEC. 120B, 201, 419, 420 R/W 149 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,ORDER … No.6 is before this Court calling in question the proceedings in C.C.No.29575/2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 66, 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 ('the Act' for short) and Sections 120(B), 201,

Viswa Hindu Parishad Kerala vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

issued by the Central Government. As per the second proviso, every aggregator shall comply with the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder. As per sub- section (2) of Section 93, the conditions referred … National Transportation Policy seeks to address; and (xi) address any other matter deemed relevant by the Central Government.14. Section 66B of the MV Act, inserted by Section 30 of theMotor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019, with effect from 01.09.2019,

Mozanta Technologies Pvt Ltd vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

3ORDERThe offences alleged are under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC, 1860, Section 65,66,43(a),(b),(j) and 66B of the Information Technology Act,2000, and Section 63 r/w Section 58 of the Copyright Act,1957. The matter settled between the defactocomplainant and