Advanced Search Results
Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another
Mumbai
Aug-06-2013
Right to Information
Crime Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya, Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharati S ...
Karnataka
Oct-09-2014
Education
376, Section 384, Section 389, Section 420, Section 504, Section 506, Section 508, Section 511, Section 354A â Information Technology Act, 2000 â Section 66A â Quash of Complaint â Respondent No.2 had lodged FIR, before police against Petitioner making
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShreya Singhal Vs. U.O.I.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-24-2015
Land Acquisition
guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The immediate cause for concern in these petitions is Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. This Section was not in the Act as originally enacted, but … over the internet is included within its reach. It will be useful to note that Section 2(v) of Information Technology Act, 2000 defines information as follows: "2. Definitions.-(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (v) "Information" includes data,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re Section 6a Of The Citizenship Act 1955
Supreme Court of India
Oct-17-2024
Right to Information
Shreya Singhal v Union of India,174 where this Court dealt with the constitutionality of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. This Court, after referring to terms in Section 66A, such as ‘grossly offensive’ or ‘menacing’, observed the same
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevidas Ramachandra Tuljapurkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-14-2015
Land Acquisition
giving immense emphasis on the said authority, has submitted that while striking down Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000 as unconstitutional, the Court has really elevated the concept of freedom of speech and expression to a great … is, however, clear that obscenity by itself has extremely poor value in the propagation of ideas, opinions and information of public interest or profit. When there is propagation of ideas, opinions and photographs collected in book form … the works in question. The other change addressed here is driven by technology, with the Internet forcing judges to consider a new twist on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChristian Louboutin Sas vs.nakul Bajaj & Ors
Delhi
Nov-02-2018
MRTP
e-commerce platform be termed as intermediary?.11. Does e-commerce website automatically come under the definition of intermediary?. As per the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter, ‘IT Act’) an `intermediary’ is defined as under: company which every runs an “Section 2(w) “intermediary”, with … expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The challenge was to the constitutional validity of Section 66A and Section 69A of the IT Act and the scope of responsibility of an intermediary under Section 79
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmish Devgan Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Dec-07-2020
Land Acquisition
provided in the Criminal Code.37. Recently, this Court in Shreya Singhal, accepting the constitutional challenge and striking down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, had differentiated between categories and adopted the scales test when offensive speech … 295A, and 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, the ‘Penal Code’) and Section 66-F of the Information Technology Act, 2000, (in short, the ‘IT Act’), no offence whatsoever can be made out; the allegations are based upon utterances
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinod D. Gangwal Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Oct-30-2015
Land Acquisition
that FIR is concerned, it alleges offence punishable under sections 188, 500, 501, 502, 66A and B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and section 23(1)(2)(3) (4) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. As far as that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManish Jain & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr.
Delhi
Apr-22-2019
Land Acquisition
Evidence showing complicity of the two petitioners (of Crl. MC59952018) in offences under Sections 66-A and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is stated to have been gathered, the charge-sheet accordingly seeking their prosecution, the role of certain others also … complaint of the first party an FIR No.4PS Amar Colony, under Sections 66A/67/67A under Information Technology Act read with Section 34 IPC as registered against … MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT1 In the context of these petitions invoking the inherent power of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC), and similarly placed other petitions which are routinely presented,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAkhil Arora & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Delhi
Apr-22-2019
Land Acquisition
Evidence showing complicity of the two petitioners (of Crl. MC59952018) in offences under Sections 66-A and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is stated to have been gathered, the charge-sheet accordingly seeking their prosecution, the role of certain others also … complaint of the first party an FIR No.4PS Amar Colony, under Sections 66A/67/67A under Information Technology Act read with Section 34 IPC as registered against … MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT1 In the context of these petitions invoking the inherent power of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC), and similarly placed other petitions which are routinely presented,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »