Advanced Search Results

Tata Sky Ltd Vs. Youtube Llc and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Tata Sky is bound to protect. Please be advised that this is an offence under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 107 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. 9. .. Therefore, you are required to

Sundar Iyer Vs. The State represented by the Inspector of Police, Vepe ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Connected Crl.M.P. is closed. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 420, Section 120-B Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 66 D Quashing of FIR Petition sought to quash First Information Report pending investigation against Petitioner/Accused for offences under

Veena Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Education

the offences punishable under Sections 341 and 384 etc., of the IPC, as well as Section 66(1) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 3. Further, it was the allegation of the respondents that a rowdy sheet was opened against the detenue

Ashwath and Others Vs. The State Through Aland Police Station, Represe ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

prosecuting the accused persons under Sec. 295-A of IPC. He further contended that even though Sec. 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 has been included in the charge sheet, but no ingredients are forthcoming in the complaint or other material. … dated 20.1.2017 for taking cognizance for the offences punishable under Sec. 295-A R/w 149 of IPC and under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act and quash FIR, complaint and entire charge sheet pending against the petitioners on

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

made, FIR No.24/2012 under Section 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) was registered against the petitioners by Cyber Police Headquarters, Bhopal, M.P. The respondent no.2,

Koshy Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 65, 66, 66(1), 66(2) and 77B; ;Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83 and 438; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 419 and 420

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT945

offences alleged, going by Annexure A First Information Report, are under Sections 65 and 66(1) and (2) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. After hearing all the counsel and the learned Additional Advocate General of the State of Punjab, it is … de facto complainant Company, it is seen that one of the offences alleged against the accused is under Section 66(1) and (2) of the Information Technology Act. Section 66 of the Information Technology Act was substituted by Act

J.N. Marshall and Co. Vs. Income Tax Officer and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254(2) and 260A

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Bom)603; [2003]264ITR690(Bom)

Kapadia, J.1.Being aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal dt. 29th Dec., 2000, in Misc. Appln. No. 219/Bom/1999, the assessee has come by way of … Misc. Appln. No. 219/Bom/1999. As stated above, this miscellaneous application was filed on 21st April, 1999. We are informed that as per the practice prevalent in the Tribunal, the appellant has to serve a copy of the … Misc. Appln. No. 219/Bom/1999, the assessee has come by way of appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, In this appeal, we are concerned with the financial year ending 31st Dec., 1985, relevant to the asst.

Nayaz Phasha vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

under Sections 384, 195A, 511 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000. To avoid repetition of facts, petition memorandum may be read as part and parcel of this application.3. The … CRIME NO.37/2023) FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 384, 195A, 511 R/W 34 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE AND 66E OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 REGISTERED BY THE SIDDAPURA POLICE NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND

Syed AsifuddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1) and 65; Income Tax Act - Sections 65 and 66; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 405, 409, 415 and 420

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)96; 2005CriLJ4314

registered under Sections 409, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC), Section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, IT Act) and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short, Copyright Act).2. The crime … Court to frame a charge specifically with regard to hacking with computer system, which is an offence under Section 66 of the IT Act. At this stage, we may read Sections 65 and 66 of the IT Act.65.

Abhishek Mishra vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

P/U/S 354-D, 354-C, 504, 506, 509 OF IPC AND SEC.3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT 1989 AND SEC.66-E OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (ANNEXURE-D) AND ETC.,THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 25.06.2025, COMING ON FOR … SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL.SPP FOR R-1; SRI M.B.RAVI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 ) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OFCR.P.C., PRAYING TO 1. QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SPL.C.NO.1029/2024 PENDING ON THE FILES OF THE COURT