Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the information technology act 2000 section 6 · Page 1 of about 3,969 results (0.107 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 11 2005

Fatima Riswana Vs. State Rep. by A.C.P., Chennai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-11-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 6; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 6; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 306, 366, 376 and 506

Reported in : AIR2005SC712; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)589; 2005CriLJ900; 116(2005)DLT382; [2005(1)JCR209(SC)]; 2005(1)JKJ1[SC]; JT2005(1)SC425; 2005(1)KLT502(SC); RLW2005(3)SC409; (2005)1SCC582

2004 wherein respondents 2 to 6 are the accused facing trial for offences punishable under Section 67 of Information Technology Act, 2000 r/w Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, Under Section 5 & 6 of Immoral

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2011

Manjeet Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-01-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376 (2) (g); 354, 363, 366, 506; The Information Technology Act 2000 - Section 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 313; The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act - Section 6

and fine of `2,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. 5. Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. - Rigorous Imprisonment for four years and fine of `10,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for … for two years and fine of `5,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. 4. Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act,1986. - Rigorous Imprisonment for two years and fine of `2,000/-.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2019

State Bank of India vs.mr. Chander Kalani and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

complaint bearing No.1/2014 before Adjudicating Officer (Principal Secretary, IT, Government of Maharashtra) under Sections 43(a) and 43 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The Adjudicating Officer directed the Appellant Bank to pay compensation of Rs. 40 Lakhs alongwith interest at rate … (2011) 182 DLT654(DB).11. Instant appeal at the instance of the Appellant is filed under Section 62 of IT Act, 2000. Section 62 reads as under: FAO. No.547/2018 Page 4 of 7 "Any person aggrieved by any decision or order … Appellant State Bank of India (Linking Road branch, Mumbai) and were having 6 fixed deposits with different maturity dates. One unknown fraudster sent several communications

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 15 2002

Dr. L. Prakash Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-15-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum grabbers Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 4, 6 and 41; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Income Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Tamil Nadu prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-grabbers (Conditions of Detention) Order, 1986

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2596

arrested by the Inspector of Police, R8 Vadapalani Police Station, Chennai for various offences, particularly Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 4 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and Section 120-B of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2016

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-03-2016

Subject : Right to Information

made, FIR No.24/2012 under Section 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) was registered against the petitioners by Cyber Police Headquarters, Bhopal, M.P. The respondent no.2, … (1) of Section 41 CrPC.” 21. In the said authority, Section 41-A CrPC, which has been inserted by Section 6 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008 (5 of 2009) was introduced and in that context,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2004

J. Rama Krishna Rao S/O Late J. Chokka Rao and ors. Vs. the Municipal ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-01-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 6; Indian Penal Code; Evidence Act, 1872; Bankers' Book Evidence Act, 1891; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; Freedom of Information Act, 2002; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act 1955 - Sections 442, 521 and 622

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD791; 2005(2)ALT186

Keeping in view of the need and to facilitate e-commerce and with a view to facilitate electronic governance, the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short 'the Act') was enacted which will make the citizens interaction with the Governmental offices hassle free … the petitioner-firm cannot be permitted to run the restaurant. 11. The petitioner-firm filed an elaborate reply-affidavit stating that Section 6 of the Act, 2000 empowers any Government and its agencies the usage of electronic records and digital signatures.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2006

V.K. Soman Achari Vs. Sabu Jacob and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-27-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891; Information Technology Act, 2000; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 14(2), 15, 15(2), 18, 190, 460 and 473

Reported in : II(2007)BC628; [2007]135CompCas79(Ker); 2007CriLJ1042

2002, came into being to amend the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891, and the Information Technology Act, 2000, for a purpose. One of the objects in bringing about the new legislation mentioned in the objects and … the case may be, exercising jurisdiction in relation to the said district or metropolitan area.4. A perusal of Section 6 reproduced above would show the classes of criminal courts which may be constituted besides the High Courts. Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2003

Soman Achari Vs. Sabu Jacob

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-27-2003

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891; Information Technology Act, 2000; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 14(2), 15, 15(2), 18, 190, 460 and 473

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT604

Act, 2002 came into being to amend the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891 and the Information Technology Act, 2000 for a purpose. One of the objects to bong about the new legislation mentioned in the Objects and … as the case may be, exercising jurisdiction in relation to the said district or metropolitan area.A perusal of Section 6 re-produced above would show the classes of Criminal Courts which may be constituted besides the High Courts. Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2008

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Vs. Mc Dowell and Company Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-07-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35D, 37(1), 37(3), 43A, 154, 234(2), 254(2) and 260A; Income Tax Rules - Rule 6D

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Kar)544; [2009]310ITR215(KAR); [2009]310ITR215(Karn); [2009]177TAXMAN317(Kar); ILR2008(3)Kar3218; 2008(3)KCCRSN216; 2008(4)AIRKarR185(DB)

expenditure relating to share issue expenses has to be disallowed as capital in nature.' (The page number of first citation i.e. : [1997]225ITR798(SC) is incorrectly mentioned in the said paragraph as 225 ITR 728' and therefore the … 1. In this appeal, filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the IT Act' for short), the Revenue has challenged the correctness of the order dated 23.10.2002 passed … and Section 37 (1) and (3) of the IT Act and Rules 6D of the Income Tax Rules, and examining to the findings of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2013

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2013

Subject : Right to Information

Crime Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This … Crime Cell, Crime Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial