Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the information technology act 2000 section 58 · Page 1 of about 632 results (0.082 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 28 2010

Aruna Kashinath Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2010

Subject : Right to Information

concerned records, documents and all electronic records pertaining to the aforesaid contraventions and violations of the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as amended using computers, computer systems, computer networks, computer resources and communication devices of the respondents as well … the powers of a civil court which are conferred on the Cyber Appellate Tribunal under Sub-Section (2) of Section 58, and- (a)All proceedings before it shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2010

Mascon Global Limited Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2010

Subject : Right to Information

concerned records, documents and all electronic records pertaining to the aforesaid contraventions and violations of the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as amended using computers, computer systems, computer networks, computer resources and communication devices of the respondents as well … the powers of a civil court which are conferred on the Cyber Appellate Tribunal under Sub-Section (2) of Section 58, and- (a)All proceedings before it shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 2018

L’oreal vs.brandworld & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-12-2018

Subject : MRTP

property. The disqualify above alia, inter factors, the website 19. www.shopclues.com for the exemption under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as the role of the website is more than that of an intermediary.20. No.2, Shopclues.com: Thus, the suit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 2014

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-12-2014

Subject : MRTP

and protection of children; (l) declare “fit persons”; (m) declare a child legally free for adoption; (n) keep information about and take necessary follow-up action in respect of missing children in their jurisdiction; Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 … the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … from children and adults alike and take necessary action.‖ (Emphasis by me) 58. The legislature has thus anticipated a situation, where a juvenile or a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd. & Ors vs.thepiratebay.org and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … of the Enforcement Directive. o Costs: Referring to the objectives of the Copyright Directive (Receitals 4, 10, 16, 58, and 59), the Enforcement Directive (Recital 23, Artt. 3 and11) and Art.12.3 of the E-Commerce Directive, the Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd & Ors. Vs.fmovies.pe and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … of the Enforcement Directive. o Costs: Referring to the objectives of the Copyright Directive (Receitals 4, 10, 16, 58, and 59), the Enforcement Directive (Recital 23, Artt. 3 and11) and Art.12.3 of the E-Commerce Directive, the Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation & Ors vs.yts.am and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … of the Enforcement Directive. o Costs: Referring to the objectives of the Copyright Directive (Receitals 4, 10, 16, 58, and 59), the Enforcement Directive (Recital 23, Artt. 3 and11) and Art.12.3 of the E-Commerce Directive, the Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd. & Ors vs.rarbg.is and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … of the Enforcement Directive. o Costs: Referring to the objectives of the Copyright Directive (Receitals 4, 10, 16, 58, and 59), the Enforcement Directive (Recital 23, Artt. 3 and11) and Art.12.3 of the E-Commerce Directive, the Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd. & Ors vs.torrentmovies.co & O ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … of the Enforcement Directive. o Costs: Referring to the objectives of the Copyright Directive (Receitals 4, 10, 16, 58, and 59), the Enforcement Directive (Recital 23, Artt. 3 and11) and Art.12.3 of the E-Commerce Directive, the Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd.& Ors. Vs.bmovies.is and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

any notice claiming a limitation of liability under any provision including Section 52(1)(c) of the Copyright Act.42. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (―IT Act‖) incorporates the defence of safe habour for the intermediaries. It defines an intermediary under Section 2(1)(w), … of the Enforcement Directive. o Costs: Referring to the objectives of the Copyright Directive (Receitals 4, 10, 16, 58, and 59), the Enforcement Directive (Recital 23, Artt. 3 and11) and Art.12.3 of the E-Commerce Directive, the Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial