Advanced Search Results
Sri. K. Balajee @ Balaji Sha vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-30-2026
under Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 34 of the IPC and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (‘the Act’ for short) in Crl.P.Nos.5539 of 2024 and 7032 of 2024 and for offences punishable under Sections … PETITION No.7032 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL PETITION No.5539 OF 2024 BETWEEN:SRI K. BALAJEE @ BALAJI SHA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS C/O KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.251 NATHAM MAIN ROAD SIRUMALAI PIRIVU ADIYANUTHU DINDIGUL DISTRICT TAMIL NADU - 624 003.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. L. Prakash Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.
Chennai
Mar-15-2002
Criminal
Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum grabbers Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 4, 6 and 41; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Income Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Tamil Nadu prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-grabbers (Conditions of Detention) Order, 1986
2002CriLJ2596
disputed that the petitioner is an accused under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 41 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 read with Section 27 of … arrested by the Inspector of Police, R8 Vadapalani Police Station, Chennai for various offences, particularly Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 4 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and Section 120-B of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.
Supreme Court of India
Jun-03-2016
Right to Information
made, FIR No.24/2012 under Section 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) was registered against the petitioners by Cyber Police Headquarters, Bhopal, M.P. The respondent no.2, … General of Police, CID to enquire into the allegations as regards the violation of the provisions enshrined under Section 41-A to 41-C of CrPC. It needs to be stated here that in pursuance of the order passed by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K. Ramajayam @ Appu Vs. The Inspector of Police, T-4, Maduravoyal Poli ...
Chennai
Jan-27-2016
Criminal
- Section 3, Section 25, Section 114, Section 45, Section 45A, section 76, Section 62, Section 65B - Information Technology Act, 2000- Section 2, Section 2(t), Section 2, Section 79A - Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - burglary and murder €“ … work in ideal situations. In K.Ramaraj v. State by Inspector of Police, CBCID, Chennai ((2014) 2 MLJ (Crl) 41), a Division Bench of this Court to which one of us (PNPJ) was a party, deprecated the practice
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJust Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish
Supreme Court of India
Sep-23-2024
Right to Information
the petition and thereby quashed the chargesheet dated 19.09.2023 filed for the offences punishable under Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, the “IT Act”) and Section 15(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 … 67B of the IT Act, whereupon the accused therein preferred an Criminal Appeal Nos. 2161-2162 of 2024 Page 41 of 199 anticipatory bail application before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The Madras High Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Patanjali Foods Limited vs Union of India
Karnataka
Nov-17-2025
In M.D.Overseas Ltd.’s case referred to supra,the High Court of Delhi has held as under“30. Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as "the IT Act") reads thus :"8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette.- … Srinivasan v. State of Karnataka AIR 1987 SC 1059 and Union of India v. Param Industries Ltd. [2016] 41 GSTR 1 (SC) ; (2016) 16 SCC 692 that, notifications would come into force on their publication in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Rajasthan
May-17-2004
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HH
(2004)190CTR(Raj)90; [2004]270ITR175(Raj)
balance will go for the purpose of computation of total income of the assessee. It is not that first the income of both the units will be clubbed and then deduction under Section 80HH is to be … to Section 80HH in asst. yrs. 1979-80 and 1980-81.2. On an application under Section 256(1) of the IT Act, the Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this Court:For asst. yr. 1979-80 :'Whether, on … of the old machinery and buildings and worked in accordance with Section 41(2), irrespective of its real character, has to be taken into account and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.R. Transport Agency Through Its Partner Sri Prabhakar Singh Vs. Unio ...
Allahabad
Sep-24-2005
Civil
Specific Relief Act - Sections 16(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 13(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 - Order 41 Rule 27(1) - Order 47 Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226
AIR2006All23; 2006(1)AWC504
is no fixed point either of transmission or of receipt.8. Anticipating the difficulties likely to arise from this, the Information Technology Act, 2000 in Section 13(3) provides as follows :-'(3) Save as otherwise agreed to between the originator and the addressee, … of review under Order 47 Rule 1 (a) or in cases of additional evidence in appeal under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of the Code of Civil Procedure or in suits for specific performance of contracts where the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEllenbarrie Industrial Gases Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Nov-20-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)83ITD111(Kol.)
of lease rent thereunder was very much a part of the disclosed operation of the assessee and all the information regarding thereto were/must have been within the knowledge of the AO at the time of making the regular … the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the assessee-company on 22nd Jan., 1997 … CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took … of Paiag Nivesh (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT and Ors.(1999) 240 ITR 419 (Cal), held that Section 158BA provides for assessment of "undisclosed income" as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAll India Children Care and Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Jun-26-2002
Direct Taxation
AO can issue notice under Section 148 if he is satisfied that income has escaped assessment, even if the information relating to such escapement is all along on the record.15.A The learned standing counsel for the Department referred … "the AO") on 7th July, 1999.3. The AO issued notices under Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the IT Act dt. 18th Jan., 2000, along with a detailed enquiry letter for each year separately. In response to these … IT Act is issued for the asst. yrs. 1993-94, 1994-95 & 1995-96." 41. It is clear from the reasons mentioned above that no facts and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »