Advanced Search Results

Yogesh Agarwal Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

of Cyber Crime Police Station (CID) for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 406, 408, 426, 120B r/w. Section 34 of IPC and Sections 62 and 72 of Information Technology Act, 2000.7. It is the submission of Sri … Sections 4 - - 403, 406, 408, 426, 120B r/w.34 of IPC and Sections 66 and 72 of Information Technology Act, 2000.2. I have heard Sri Uday Holla, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of Sri Smaran Shetty for the

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

Matched in: Citation AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

Phani Leyba Nangli vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

ARREST IN CRIME No.384/2025 REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 66(C) AND 66(D) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2008, SECTION 84(B) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 AND SECTION 318(4), 319, 61(2) READ WITH SECTION 3(5) OF BHARATHIYA NYAYA SANHITHA, 2023.IN CRL.P No. 15869/2025 BETWEEN:1. … Crime No.70/2017 of Shillong, Laitumkhrah Police Station registered for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 419, 420 read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 66(C), 66(D) of Information and Technology Act. Accused No.4 was earlier working in Megalaya

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Vs. Mc Dowell and Company Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35D, 37(1), 37(3), 43A, 154, 234(2), 254(2) and 260A; Income Tax Rules - Rule 6D

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Kar)544; [2009]310ITR215(KAR); [2009]310ITR215(Karn); [2009]177TAXMAN317(Kar); ILR2008(3)Kar3218; 2008(3)KCCRSN216; 2008(4)AIRKarR185(DB)

expenditure relating to share issue expenses has to be disallowed as capital in nature.' (The page number of first citation i.e. : [1997]225ITR798(SC) is incorrectly mentioned in the said paragraph as 225 ITR 728' and therefore the … 1. In this appeal, filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the IT Act' for short), the Revenue has challenged the correctness of the order dated 23.10.2002 passed

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(17); Parliament Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154; Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

the form of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … is quite immaterial. In Maharaj Kumar Kamal Singh v. CIT : [1959]35ITR1(SC) , the Supreme Court, while construing Section 34(1)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, has held that the word 'information' appearing therein should be treated to

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; ;Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 2(17); ;Parliament Act; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); ;Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 2(1); ;Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Section 26; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 154; ;Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; ;Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(Gau)318,[2005]275ITR502(Gauhati)

the form of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … is quite immaterial. In Maharaj Kumar Kamal Singh v. CIT : [1959]35ITR1(SC) , the Supreme Court, while construing Section 34(1)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, has held that the word 'information' appearing therein should be treated to

Dilip Jose vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 318 AND 3(5) OF THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 AND SECTION 72 OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE XXIX ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU, QUA THE PETITIONER (ANNEXURE-A).THIS PETITION, … State Electricity Board was made an accused for the offence under Sections 192 and 199 respectively read with Section 34 of the IPC, this Court observed thus: “30. It is trite law that wherever by a legal fiction

Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya, Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharati S ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

376, Section 384, Section 389, Section 420, Section 504, Section 506, Section 508, Section 511, Section 354A – Information Technology Act, 2000 – Section 66A – Quash of Complaint – Respondent No.2 had lodged FIR, before police against Petitioner making … 156(3), Section 157, Section 161, Section 164, Section 166(3), Section 200, Section 482 – Indian Penal Code – Section 34, Section 123, Section 153B, Section 163A, Section 375, Section 375(a), Section 375(b), Section 376, Section 384, Section 389,

Christian Louboutin Sas vs.nakul Bajaj & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

e-commerce platform be termed as intermediary?.11. Does e-commerce website automatically come under the definition of intermediary?. As per the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter, ‘IT Act’) an `intermediary’ is defined as under: company which every runs an “Section 2(w) “intermediary”, with … DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. h July, 2018 Date of decision :2nd November, 2018 CS (COMM) 344/2018, I.As. 19124/2014, 20912/2014, 23749/2014 & 9106/2015 CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN SAS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Dhruv Anand,

M/S Patanjali Foods Limited vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

In M.D.Overseas Ltd.’s case referred to supra,the High Court of Delhi has held as under“30. Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as "the IT Act") reads thus :"8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette.- … of the Constitution-Tenth Edition, Introduction ex). The apex court made a reference to United States v. Wunderlick (1951) 342 US 98, wherein it was held that, "when it has freed man from he unlimited discretion of some