Advanced Search Results

Fatima Riswana Vs. State Rep. by A.C.P., Chennai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 6; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 6; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 306, 366, 376 and 506

Reported in : AIR2005SC712; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)589; 2005CriLJ900; 116(2005)DLT382; [2005(1)JCR209(SC)]; 2005(1)JKJ1[SC]; JT2005(1)SC425; 2005(1)KLT502(SC); RLW2005(3)SC409; (2005)1SCC582

2004 wherein respondents 2 to 6 are the accused facing trial for offences punishable under Section 67 of Information Technology Act, 2000 r/w Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, Under Section 5 & 6 of Immoral … Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, Under Section 5 & 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, Under Section 27 of Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 120(B), 506(ii), 366, 306 & 376 I.P.C. The said trial relates to

Dr. Prakash Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32; ;Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention of Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, (Forest-Offenders), Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-Grabbers for Preventing their Dangerous Activities Prejudicial to the Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1982 - Sections 3(1); ;Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; ;Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 4 and 6; ;Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2002SC3533; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)275; 2002CriLJ4721; (2002)7SCC759; 2002(2)LC1501(SC)

2nd respondent herein. The main ground of detentionare that the petitioner was indulging in offences under Section67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Sections 4 and 6of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act,1986 and under Section 27 of the Arms

Commissioner of Customs and Central Exci Vs. M/S. Deloitte Tax Servaic ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

on such services. He also relied upon the definition of the term "data" in Section 2 (O) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and contended that the activity of the assessee is in relation to operation of computer systems and therefore … office services , lead tax services, international assignment services, etc under an Agreement for Services and Development dated 27-09-2004. The assessee got registered under the categories of "business auxiliary service" and "management consultancy service" with the jurisdictional

Dr. L. Prakash Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum grabbers Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 4, 6 and 41; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Income Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Tamil Nadu prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-grabbers (Conditions of Detention) Order, 1986

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2596

arrested by the Inspector of Police, R8 Vadapalani Police Station, Chennai for various offences, particularly Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 4 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and Section 120-B of … with Section 41 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and 120-B(ii) of the Indian Penal Code. He filed a petition before the

Schenectady Beck India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)92TTJ(Mum.)872

AO is thus prejudicial to the interest of Revenue." 4. Shri Khare, the learned counsel for the assessee first drew our attention to the highlights of the agreement which are as follows: Clause (1) Agreement to lease-Lessee … two appeals are directed against the orders of the CIT, City-IV, Mumbai, under Section 263 of the IT Act and the main common ground raised reads as under: "The learned CIT made a grievous error by assumption … land developer, Mr. Pramod Navalkar for construction of office premises, admeasuring about 27,000 sq. ft., and development of land surrounding the building. The total consideration

Bharatiya Janata Party Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)80ITD89(Delhi)

making activity into a profit earning one as of now.46. During the course of the present hearing, no information has been furnished to us by either side as to whether similar publishing activity is being carried on … learned standing counsel also relied on a Departmental Circular dt. 19th Oct., 2000, according to which provisions of Section 44AB r/w Section 271B were held … as a National Party with the Election Commission of India. A notice under Section 142(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the "Act") and a letter bearing No. 363 dt. 30th Nov., 1995 were issued on … The Board have received representation regarding the applicability of Sections 44AB and 271B of the IT Act, in the case of political parties. 2. The

P.R. Transport Agency Through Its Partner Sri Prabhakar Singh Vs. Unio ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 16(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 13(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 - Order 41 Rule 27(1) - Order 47 Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : AIR2006All23; 2006(1)AWC504

is no fixed point either of transmission or of receipt.8. Anticipating the difficulties likely to arise from this, the Information Technology Act, 2000 in Section 13(3) provides as follows :-'(3) Save as otherwise agreed to between the originator and the addressee, … under Order 47 Rule 1 (a) or in cases of additional evidence in appeal under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of the Code of Civil Procedure or in suits for specific performance of contracts where the pleadings of

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

from regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 … C.C.No.156/2020 pending before the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CMM, Mysuru taking Cognisance of the offences punishable under Section 27(a)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and issuing Summons to the petitioners.2. The Petitioner in Crl.P. No.4712/2020

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

from regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 … C.C.No.156/2020 pending before the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CMM, Mysuru taking Cognisance of the offences punishable under Section 27(a)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and issuing Summons to the petitioners.2. The Petitioner in Crl.P. No.4712/2020

Moolchand Kharaiti Ram Hospital vs.workers Thru m.k.r.h.karamchar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

unable to agree with the said contention.” Analysis 27. The pleadings, whether by petitioner or by respondent, … effectively conclude the factual position that the respondent- Hospital was established not for the purpose of profit.50. At first glance, there appears to be some substance in the contention of Mr. Manish Sharma. However, the definition of … Industrial Tribunal-II, Karkardooma, holding the petitioner liable to pay bonus, to its employees, under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), for the year 1997-1998. The contention, of the petitioner, that it … expenditure and resultant surplus of the petitioner-Hospital for the years 1991-1992 to 2000-2001.17. In view of the two affidavits filed by him, MW-1 M.K. Kaushik … the requirement of such payment, under sub-clause (c) of clause (v) of Section 32 of the Act [referred to, hereinafter, for the sake of expediency,