Advanced Search Results

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT DECLARING THAT SECTION 79(3)(b) OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (IT ACT) DOES NOT CONFER AUTHORITY TO ISSUE INFORMATION BLOCKING ORDERS UNDER THE IT ACT, AND FURTHER DECLARE … across borders, planting the seeds of international trade. This long march of progress culminated in postal reforms of 1874 and 1875 whereupon the General Postal Union, subsequently renamed as the Universal Postal Union, was born, erecting for

Farrukhabad GramIn Bank Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)103ITD207Agra

the orders passed by both the lower authorities below are without appreciating the facts, various submissions, explanation and information submitted by the appellant from time to time which ought to have been considered before passing the impugned … case of Farrukhabad Grameen Bank, Fathegarh in Appeal No. 54/CIT(A)-l/Ward-I/Farrukhabad/1999-2000 dt.29th Feb., 2000 (supra) for asst. yr. 1998-99 has held as under: In the present … was limited to urban and semi urban centers only. The bank's objective was to discharge the responsibilities under Section 18(2)(a) and (b) of RRB Act, 1976 by extending credit facilities through implementation of various Government sponsored schemes for

Manoj Jose vs Anil Kumar

Court : Kerala

those under Section 66D and 67 of the Information Technology Act.6. Initially the Offence under Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 could be dealt with, Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 reads as follows;“Punishment for cheating by … OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1941 CRIME NO. 217/2018 OF Thankamani Police Station , Idukki PETITIONER: MANOJ JOSE AGED 40 YEARS S/O.

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

made, FIR No.24/2012 under Section 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) was registered against the petitioners by Cyber Police Headquarters, Bhopal, M.P. The respondent no.2, … they were forced to pay Rs.5 lakhs to respondent no.3, Deepak Thakur, Dy. S.P. Cyber Cell, Bhopal. On 18.12.2012, chargesheet was filed and thereafter a petition under Section 482 CrPC has been filed before the High Court

Sooraj V. Sukumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

foroffences punishable under sections 354A(1)(iv), 509, 294(b) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology Act 2000, apart from sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(1)(w)(ii) of the Act in Crime No.744 of 2022 of the Ernakulam … and the said right can be taken away by the statute itself. In tune with the aforesaid principle, section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act'), curtailed the

Cambrian Hall Educational Trust Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Delhi)838

an estimate. His address as stated by the assessee is R. Kumar & Co., Karanpur, Dehradun,. As per the information of the Department, the address is 76, Khurbura Mohalla, Dehradun,. He is not traceable at either of the … issued notice under Section 148 of the IT Act on 24th Aug., 2000. The learned counsel for the assessee requested for inspection of the file … 2,67,000. His address is shown by the assessee as Mittal & Co. 18, Patel Nagar, Dehradun. Enquiries conducted by the Department reveal that no such … 7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) erred in holding the action of the AO in using, against the appellant while passing the assessment order, the statements of S/Shri R.C.

Kalyani Sales Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(8), 13(10), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(6), 17(7), 18A, 18(1), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(8), 19(25), 31, 34, 35, 37, 38(2), 40 and 40(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - 1(4), 2, 3, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 17, 19, 19(1) and 31; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 12, 17 and 18; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2000; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2006P& H107; I(2006)BC1; (2006)142PLR1; [2006]70SCL177(Punj& Har)

Government may, by notification and in the Electronic Gazette as defined in clause (s) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), make rules for carrying out the provisions of this Act.(2) In particular, and without prejudice … upon them to pay an amount of Rs. 88,61,830.68 p. The petitioners filed reply to the notice on 18.10.2003 disputing their liability to pay the said amount. They asked for a copy of account and withdrawal of

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

from regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 … proceedings in C.C.No.156/2020 initiated against the petitioners in both the matters and certain others for alleged violation of Section 18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 punishable under Section 27(b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

from regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 … proceedings in C.C.No.156/2020 initiated against the petitioners in both the matters and certain others for alleged violation of Section 18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 punishable under Section 27(b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Cit Vs. Virtual Soft Systems Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

(5) appeals being ITA Nos. 117, 118, 119, 120 and 2292/Del/2006 and 04. In so far as the first appeal ITA 216, 398, 403, 404 and 680/2011 Page 1 of 18 was concerned, that is, the one … life of the asset. The other attribute of such a transaction is that the risk of breakdown or technological obsolescence is transferred to the lessee, who therefore ordinarily would bear the cost of maintenance, repairs and insurance … Income Tax (in short CIT) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the I.T. Act). The issue on merits was the … the assessment years (in short AY) in issue were: AYs 1996-97 to 2000-01. Thus, the Tribunal, by virtue of the impugned judgment dealt in all