Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the information technology act 2000 section 16 · Page 1 of about 2,645 results (0.087 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 03 2016

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-03-2016

Subject : Right to Information

made, FIR No.24/2012 under Section 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) was registered against the petitioners by Cyber Police Headquarters, Bhopal, M.P. The respondent no.2, … must follow the order. The duty certificate was granted to me on 26.11.2012, on which Report No.567 time 16.30 was registered, in which there are clear directions. In compliance with this order, we reached Kondwa Police Station

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2005

P.R. Transport Agency Through Its Partner Sri Prabhakar Singh Vs. Unio ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-24-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 16(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 13(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 - Order 41 Rule 27(1) - Order 47 Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : AIR2006All23; 2006(1)AWC504

is no fixed point either of transmission or of receipt.8. Anticipating the difficulties likely to arise from this, the Information Technology Act, 2000 in Section 13(3) provides as follows :-'(3) Save as otherwise agreed to between the originator and the addressee, … or in suits for specific performance of contracts where the pleadings of 'readiness and willingness' required under Section 16(1)(c) of the Specific Relief Act has not been made originally in the plaint and is sought to be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2024

Anu Shanthi vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2024

Subject : Criminal

for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.9. As per the impugned … of PW1, and Swasthika, aged 3 ½ years, the daughter of PW1, and attempted murder of PW1 on 16.04.2014 in their residential house bearing No. 3/173 of Attingal Municipality.2. PW1, an engineer by profession, working at Moozhiyar,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 24 2024

Nino Mathew vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2024

Subject : Criminal

for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.9. As per the impugned … of PW1, and Swasthika, aged 3 ½ years, the daughter of PW1, and attempted murder of PW1 on 16.04.2014 in their residential house bearing No. 3/173 of Attingal Municipality.2. PW1, an engineer by profession, working at Moozhiyar,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2024

State of Kerala vs Nino Mathew

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2024

for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.9. As per the impugned … of PW1, and Swasthika, aged 3 ½ years, the daughter of PW1, and attempted murder of PW1 on 16.04.2014 in their residential house bearing No. 3/173 of Attingal Municipality.2. PW1, an engineer by profession, working at Moozhiyar,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2012

Tirumala Devi Eada and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Law (La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-17-2012

Subject : Education

publication in the A.P. State Gazette is immaterial. At the outset, we may refer to Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000: “8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette:- Where any law provides that any rule, regulation, order, … order preferably in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare G.O.Ms.No.132, Law (LA and J SC.F) Department dated 16 Nov 11 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law wholly unconstitutinal and quash the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2004

Cambrian Hall Educational Trust Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-11-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Delhi)838

an estimate. His address as stated by the assessee is R. Kumar & Co., Karanpur, Dehradun,. As per the information of the Department, the address is 76, Khurbura Mohalla, Dehradun,. He is not traceable at either of the … issued notice under Section 148 of the IT Act on 24th Aug., 2000. The learned counsel for the assessee requested for inspection of the file … reasons in support of his findings in the assessment order at pp. 16 to 18. The reasons for making addition of Rs. 5,99,500 have been … 7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) erred in holding the action of the AO in using, against the appellant while passing the assessment order, the statements of S/Shri R.C.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2007

income Tax Officer Vs. Lanyard Foods Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-31-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)112TTJ(Mum.)334

These two appeals are of Revenue for asst. yrs. 1997-98 and 1999 2000 directed against two separate orders of CIT(A)-X, Mumbai, dt. 4th June, 2003 … 1997-98.For the sake of convenience, both these appeals and cross-objection are being disposed of by this common order.2. First, we take up the Revenue's appeal for asst. yr. 1997-98 in ITA No. 5549/Mum/2003. On the facts and … erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,24,16,500 made by the AO under Section 68 of the IT Act as unexplained share capital.4. The learned Departmental Representative supported the assessment order and reliance was placed on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2014

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-12-2014

Subject : MRTP

“fit persons”; (m) declare a child legally free for adoption; (n) keep information about and take necessary follow-up action in respect of missing children in … the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … 17 of the Act makes it ―open‖ to the Magistrate to place such child or minor, rescued under section 16, in any institution established or recognised under any Children's Act for the time being in force in any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2001

Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-20-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)83ITD111(Kol.)

of lease rent thereunder was very much a part of the disclosed operation of the assessee and all the information regarding thereto were/must have been within the knowledge of the AO at the time of making the regular … the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the assessee-company on 22nd Jan., 1997 … CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took … were sold to both the concerns for the total amount of Rs. 16,38,000 in each case comprising of the actual sale price of Rs. 15,75,000

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial