Advanced Search Results

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT DECLARING THAT SECTION 79(3)(b) OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (IT ACT) DOES NOT CONFER AUTHORITY TO ISSUE INFORMATION BLOCKING ORDERS UNDER THE IT ACT, AND FURTHER DECLARE … knowledge flowing not from ink, but from memory, tradition and discourse. The invention of printing press in the 15th century shattered this dominion, scattering words across continents, as print began to travel farther than voice had ever

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

“fit persons”; (m) declare a child legally free for adoption; (n) keep information about and take necessary follow-up action in respect of missing children in … the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … court is to proceed in a matter where the persons recovered by the police in a raid under Section 15 or 16 of the IT Act, 1956, are under 18 years of age. Are the authorities required to

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

from regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 … and furnished the list of Directors of Snapdeal and on subsequent dates, the same exercise was repeated. On 15.01.2020, Snapdeal replied to the Respondent. 4.17.10. On the basis of the above it is alleged that there is

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the petition and thereby quashed the chargesheet dated 19.09.2023 filed for the offences punishable under Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, the “IT Act”) and Section 15(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

from regional, national and international brands and retailers. 4.2. Snapdeal is ‘intermediary’ as defined under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IT Act’). An Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 6 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 … and furnished the list of Directors of Snapdeal and on subsequent dates, the same exercise was repeated. On 15.01.2020, Snapdeal replied to the Respondent. 4.17.10. On the basis of the above it is alleged that there is

Doly Prabhat Maithy vs State by

Court : Karnataka

after giving him anopportunity of being heard, cause an inquiry to be made as to the correctness of the information received under sub-section (1) of Section 16, the age, character and antecedents of the person and the suitability … age, are they to be dealt with under the IT Act, 1956 or in accordance with the JJ Act, 2000? In order to find answers to the questions arising in the present case, we may firstly consider the … 17 and Section 17A of the Act. It reads as follows: “17. Intermediate custody of persons removed under Section 15 or rescued under Section 16.-(1) When the special police officer removing a personunder sub-section (4) of Section 15

Vinod Kumar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)98TTJAgra769

seizure of the silver ornaments/silver from these five persons.4.2 The Director of Income-tax, Investigation, after having received this information, issued a warrant of requisition under Section 132A of the Act on 3rd April, 2000, directing the Superintendent … orders of CIT(A), dt. 9th Oct., 2002, whereby he has upheld the validity of notices issued under Section 158BC of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and consequential assessments for block period both

Sri Binoj P J vs State by Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

the charge sheet in Special Case No.2119 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (‘the IT Act’ for short) and Section 15 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (‘the

Tirumala Devi Eada and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Law (La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

publication in the A.P. State Gazette is immaterial. At the outset, we may refer to Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000: “8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette:- Where any law provides that any rule, regulation, order, … of Service) Rules, 1974 framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India is a civil post under Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, held that the post of Assistant Public Prosecutor was a civil post

Madanapalli Institute of Technology and Science and Others Vs. State o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10, 11 and 23; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation fee) Act, 1983 - Sections 3(1) and 12; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 246(1 and 3), 248, 252, 254 and 371-D; Andhra Pradesh Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission into under-graduate professional courses through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 1993 - Rules 4, 5, 6 and 7; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission) Order, 1974; Constitution (Amendment) Act, 1976; Andhra Pradesh Commissionerate of Higher Education Act, 1986; University Grants Commission Act, 1956; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 10(A and B(3)); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 -

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD179; 2000(1)ALT666

Matched in: Citation 2000(2)ALD179; 2000(1)ALT666