Advanced Search Results

Tata Sky Ltd Vs. Youtube Llc and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Tata Sky is bound to protect. Please be advised that this is an offence under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 107 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. 9. .. Therefore, you are required to … The impugned links were created/uploaded/made available by third party users on YouTube and not by YouTube itself. Under Section 11 of the IT Act, an electronic record sent by an originator or even a person acting on his

The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and Another Vs. M/s. Reliance ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

(A) Constitution of India, 1950 Article 254 Companies Act, 1956 Section 391, Section 394 Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 11 Sanction of scheme Chargeability of stamp duty Whether scheme sanctioned between two companies under Section 391 and 394

All India Primary Teachers Vs. Director of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Delhi)155

application dt. 6th Feb., 2001, which was though allowed by DIT but it was allowed w.e.f. 1st April, 2000. In its application for registration and in its application for condonation of delay dt. 6th Feb., 2001, it … of primary school teachers with no profit motive and with no political affiliation. It was inaugurated by the first Prime Minister of India in the year 1957.The society was incorporated under Societies Registration Act in Patna on … passed by Director of IT (Exemption) (hereinafter referred to as "DIT") under Section 12A of the IT Act is against the action of DIT in … Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co.Ltd. v. State of U.P. and Ors. (1979) 118 ITR 326 (SC) was the submission of the counsel. It was further

Anu Shanthi vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.9. As per the impugned … her place of work at Kazhakuttom and since PW1 was on leave, he left the house at about 11 a.m. to the post office at Alamcode and while he was standing at Alamcode junction, he received a

Nino Mathew vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.9. As per the impugned … her place of work at Kazhakuttom and since PW1 was on leave, he left the house at about 11 a.m. to the post office at Alamcode and while he was standing at Alamcode junction, he received a

State of Kerala vs Nino Mathew

Court : Kerala

for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.9. As per the impugned … her place of work at Kazhakuttom and since PW1 was on leave, he left the house at about 11 a.m. to the post office at Alamcode and while he was standing at Alamcode junction, he received a

M/S Clues Netwrok Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Skullcandy Inc

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

basis of which the website of the present Appellant would be disqualified for exemption under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 („IT Act‟) since the role of its website was “more than that of an intermediary”. RFA(OS)(COMM) 1/2019 & … which was dismissed as withdrawn on 23rd February, 2017 with liberty to file a fresh application. However, on 11th May, 2017 the Court noted that the present Appellant decided not to file a fresh application under Order

M/S Clues Network Pvt Ltd vs.m/s L’oreal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

basis of which the website of the present Appellant would be disqualified for exemption under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 („IT Act‟) since the role of its website was “more than that of an intermediary”. RFA(OS)(COMM) 1/2019 & … which was dismissed as withdrawn on 23rd February, 2017 with liberty to file a fresh application. However, on 11th May, 2017 the Court noted that the present Appellant decided not to file a fresh application under Order

Pargat Singh Vs. Income Tax Officer [Alongwith Ita

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)95TTJ(Chd.)295

2005, in the case of Modern Feed Industries v. ITO in ITA No. 375/Chd/2004 for the asst. yr. 2000-01 24. Order of Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'SMC' dt. 14th Jan., 2000, in the case of D.P. Singh Chadha … grounds of appeal, the passing of order under Section 263 of IT Act is otherwise not sustainable." 3. First I will deal with ITA Nos. 1111 to 1114/Chd/2004 in the case of Shri Pargat Singh.4. The facts … is otherwise not sustainable." 3. First I will deal with ITA Nos. 1111 to 1114/Chd/2004 in the case of Shri Pargat Singh.4. The facts of

Tapan Kumar Dutta Vs. Commnr. Of Income Tax, West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Mill under Section 132 of the IT Act. Since the notice under Section 158BC issued to M/s Nitya 11 Kali Rice Mill and the notice under Section 158BC issued to the Appellant were on the same day … Act is valid or not?. 5 Rival contentions:-5) Learned senior counsel for the appellant strenuously contended that the first notice issued under Section 158BC of the IT Act dated 09.09.1999 is the valid notice and the assessment