Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

37. Mr. S.N. Soparkar, learned Senior Advocate appeared for the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (hereafter “AUDA”); the Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (hereafter “GIDC”) and Gujarat Housing Board (hereafter “GHB”). Counsel submitted that all three corporations were established … of GS1 India submitted that the assessee is involved in issuing bar codes which is a global language of standardised coding and the is a … 58 Inserted by Finance (2) Act, 2014 and amended by Finance Act, 2020 59 (1996) 2 SCC549 The court had cited Article 25(1) of the … Maritime Board case (supra). The decision discussed Sections 73, 74 & 75 of the GMB Act, which … promotion and development of the game of cricket in the Association’s jurisdiction. Other objects include creation, fostering friendly relationships through sports tournaments and the creation of a healthy sportsmanship spirit, through the medium of sports in general … Trust .................................................................................................................. 18 F. Deletion of certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20

Amazon.com Nv Investment Holdings Llc Vs. Future Retail Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

purposes under all statutes, whether State or Central.” (emphasis supplied) 58. Mr. Viswanathan cited the judgment Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation v. Diamond & Gem Development Corporation Ltd., (2013) 5 SCC470 Far from supporting 82 … aid of the Board Resolution made by the Board of Directors of FRL on 29 August 2020 in relation to the Disputed Transaction, including but not limited to filing or pursuing any application before any person, including … made under Section 17(2) read with Order XXXIX, Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“Code of Civil Procedure”]. in which it was … Ltd. v. Union of India, (2014) 7 SCC603: (2014) 3 SCC (Civ) 737]..” * * * “10. In the matter of interpretation, the court has

Hasham Investment And Trading Company Private Limited Vs. India Awake ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the learned Magistrate, exercising the powers conferred under Section 255(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, convicted accused Nos.1, 2 and 5 for the offence … for Transparency" vide resolution dated 01.07.2015 and it was continued until December 2020, when the authorization was replaced in the Court records by a vakalathnama … which amounts to abuse of the process of law. In Advocate General, State of Bihar v. M.P. Khair Industries [(1980) 3 SCC311:1980. SCC (Cri) 688]. this Court was of the opinion that such a repeated filing of … the CA's for recall of merger and has appeared in the 26 proceedings in various other judicial forums relating to the matters in this regard being prosecuted by the petitioner as Advocate of the petitioner. The role … no public interest nor serving any public cause. 7358. It is also relevant to state at this

N.Bharathirajan vs the High Court of Madras

Court : Chennai

and others29 19.Brigadier Nalin Kumar Bhatia v. Union of India and Others30 20.Moon Mills Ltd. v. M.R.Meher, President, Industrial Court, Bombay(2007) 4 SCC 221 2008-2-L.W. 106(2011) 15 SCC 111(2013) 3 SCC 99(2013) 9 SCC 363(2016) 8 SCC … in the web site of the High Court of Madras on 06.08.2013 and from the 1 st respondent relating to the issue of G.O.Ms:No.5 Public (Special - A) Department dated 02.01.2014 and quash the same and all … afresh the viva voce in accordance with law viz., independently verifying the criminal antecedents of the candidates, 7 years practice by the candidates, by video … Magistrate Court, George Town, Chennai. The crimes alleged were in terms of Sections 147, 341 and 323 IPC. There was no disclosure in regard to … 37.63 67 Mr.A.Kannan 66.5 20 33.25 4 37.25 7315. The petitioners have argued, relying on certain decisions,

Star Smith Export Private Limited & Anr. vs a O Smith Corporation ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

theCommercial Courts Act, 2015, read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19081, assailing the impugned judgments dated 22.03.2024 and 24.12.2025 … converted to “AEROSTAR” in 2005 and subsequently to Appellant No. 1 in 2020. It was averred that “SMITH” was adopted from the nickname of Appellant … 216/2025 Page 9 of 22Interactive (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Vivek Pahwa8 and Raman Kwatra & Anr. v. KEI Industries Ltd9. It is also contended that failure to disclose third-party use of “SMITH” misrepresented exclusivity over the said … the appellants from using the marks “STARSMITH”, “STAR SMITH” and “BLUE DIAMOND” or any deceptively similar mark in relation to the manufacture and sale of geysers, water purifiers, RO systems and allied goods. However, the appellants were … J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 13 of theCommercial Courts Act, 2015, read with … Wow Momo Foods Private8 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 7351 9 2023 SCC OnLine Del 38 10 (2010)

Krishnappa Vs. M/s Remco (bhel)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

465, 471, 419, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is also pointed out that the State Government in its order … IN 'SMT. JAYAMMA V. STATE OF KARNATAKA', I.LR. 2020 KAR1449 13. Learned counsel for allotees while adopting … ascertaining the liability to pay tax and does not confer any title. Now we may take note of section 73 114-A of the Act, which is reproduced below for the facility of reference:114. . Review by the Commissioner.-. … AND OTHERS', (2008) 13 SCC102 'RITESH TEWARI AND ANR. VS. STATEOF U.P. AND ORS.', AIR2010SC3823 'SURAJ LAMP AND INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED (2) THROUGH DIRECTOR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER', (2012) 1 SCC656and division bench decision of … as there was no material on record to set up the 59 relationship of the appellants with Siddamma. It is also contended that Khathas in

Mr Amrish Gupta vs Gurchait Singh Chima Deceased Through Lr and Widow ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

heir and widow, Smt. Daljeet Kaur Chima.4. The dispute pertains to an immovable property bearing No. B-II/46,Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, New Delhi, comprising a plot of land measuring approximately 2390 sq. yards along with superstructures constructed thereon … but proceeded to undertake its own comparison of the disputed and admitted signatures in exercise of powers under Section 73 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In doing so, the Tribunal examined a range of admitted documents, including … crores at the time of execution and the nature of the buyer-seller relationship between the parties. It is argued that such questions could not have … the conclusion recorded inparagraph 16.17 of the cancellation report under Section 173 CrPC, which reads as under: “16.17. Conclusion in respect of property no. B-II/46, … well as the arbitral award dated 17th October, 2020.Submissions on behalf of parties13. On behalf of the

Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association Vs. Nbcc (i ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to Agra; and a 18 ‘SPV’ for short. 10 Concession Agreement19 was entered into with the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority20. With setting up of this company JIL, apart from other projects, housing plans were envisaged for … plan1 in the corporate insolvency resolution process2 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 20163 1 Hereinafter, at some places, it has also been referred to … NBCC (INDIA) LTD. & ORS. ……. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.3396 of 2020, T.C (C) Nos. 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, … of the financial creditors, IDBI Bank Limited, under Section 7 of the Code. However, when the Interim … Civil Appeal No.3395 of 2020, being I.A. Nos. 73323 of 2020 and 73330 of 2020 respectively, essentially … therefore entitled for return of it.58. If trust concept is examined, we will know that trust is a relationship where property/money held by one party for the benefit of another party. Trustee holds the property/money for the

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 SCC401Transfer Case (C) No.229 of 2020 Page 73 of 179 appellants' objection was read and ruled … a right to know in order to be able to take part in a participatory development in the industrial life and democracy. Right to know is a basic right which citizens of a free country aspire in … We now turn to the preliminary objection raised in I.A. No.59230 of 2020 as regards the propriety of the Court’s order to collectively entertain the … notified in MPD2021 This proposed change interferes with the original urban design of this precinct and changes the relationship between built and unbuilt of the Central Vista. Suggestions: On account of general inability to understand the merit … situation specific. In United Kingdom grant of relief is now covered by Criminal Justice and Courts Act, 2015 which defines the Transfer Case (C) No.229 … the Central Government in exercise of powers under Section 11A of the Act. In the context of

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

is submitted that the FATF was established by the Heads of State or Government of the seven major industrial nations (Group of Seven, G-7) joined by the President of the European Commission in a summit in Paris … Companies Act, 20136, the Prevention of Corruption Act, 19887, the Indian Penal Code, 18608 and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19739 which are also under … (1962) 3 SCR338 Also see: Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 2020 SCC OnLine SC882(Para88) 35 officer is not a police officer within the … purpose of investigation are in consonance with what has been held in Tofan Singh33 and establishes a direct relationship with the prohibition under Section 25 of the 1872 Act. Another crucial point raised is that most statutes … made was insertion of Section 45(1A) and Section 73(2)(ua), by which the right of police officers to