Advanced Search Results

The Tata Power Company Limited Transmission Vs. Maharashtra Electricit ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

39 of the Act and Regulation 8 of the MERC (State Grid Code) Regulations 2006. On 7 March 2013, MSETCL in a communication to MERC … GR dated 4 January 2019. On 15 January 2020, MERC sought the recommendations of the STU on … D. 2.1 Central Policies.................................................................................................. 43 D. 2.2 State Policies ..................................................................................................... 47 E. The Analysis ................................................................................................................... 48 E. 1 Section 63: The dominant route or the alternative route ........................................... 49 E. 1.1. The value of TBCB Guidelines prescribed under … and State Governments, generating companies, authorities and licensees.52. Section 39 stipulates that the State Government may notify the Board or any government company as the STU. The STU shall undertake transmission of electricity through the intra-state transmission … note that consolidated detail study will be carried out considering all Mumbai related schemes separately. Subsequent STU study indicated that with inclusion of 400kV Velgaon,

Angul Energy Limited Formerily Known as Bhushan Energy Limited vs Mini ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

regime, the corporate debtor could indefinitely continue to enjoy the protection given under Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 or under other such enactments which has now been forsaken. Besides, the commercial wisdom of … referred to as “CIRP”) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “IBC”) was initiated against the Petitioner by … interpretation of terms and provisions as defined under the IBC, despite a categorical bar to that effect under Section 63 of the IBC, the KUMARI SHARMA W.P.(C) 10431/2020 Page 16 of 87impugned order is patently illegal and beyond … Other Creditors with regard to any claims (as defined under the IBC) relating in any manner to the period prior to the Closing Date (whether

Roseland Buildtech Pvt Ltd vs Vihaan 43 Reality Pvt Ltd Earlier Known ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

SCC 221.(2013) 177 Comp Cas 199.(2025) 259 Comp Cas 1.(2024) 5 HCC (Del) 170.(2024) 242 Comp Cas 700.United Industrial Bank Ltd18, T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal and Anr.19, Ramisetty v. Nasyam Jamal Saheb20, In Satish Khosla v. … petition against the plaintiff, under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter ―IBC‖/―Code‖), before the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi (‗NCLT’) … 599. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 800 of 2020. 2021 SCC OnLine NCLAT 598. 2023 SCC OnLine … involved in the instantlis and to answer questions involved in the present suit, the bar provided for under Section 63 and 231 of the IBC applies. The I.A. 22791/2025 filed by defendant no. 1 under Order VII Rule … on facts, also is not of much significance, as the neat issue relates to the interpretation of law. V. OBJECT AND PURPOSE OF THE IBC27.

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

media for wider publicity.55. Later, on 30.03.2020, the MERC issued an order approving a moratorium for consumers under the Industrial and Commercial category, on payment of electricity bills for three billing cycles beginning from the lockdown date of … Laws in force in India and any stature, ordinance, regulation, notification or code, rule, or any interpretation of any of them by an Indian Government … executed pursuant to a bidding process carried out by the Appellant under the aegis of the MERC under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The tariff was adopted by the MERC (Respondent No.1) and the Power Purchase … the meaning ascribed there to in Article 11.3.4 Law - means, in relation to this Agreement, all laws including Electricity Laws in force in India

The State Of Karnataka Vs. Pranav V Deshpande

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

to respect the right of the child to preserve his or her identity, including nationality, name and family relations as recognized by law without unlawful interference.2. Where a child is illegally deprived of some or all of … the Union Parliament intended its legislation to be a complete and exhaustive code relating to the subject, it shall be taken that the Union law … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE09h DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY … and universities, subject to the provisions of entries 63, 64, 65 and 66 of List I; vocational … the Sugar Control Order, 1955 and the Sugarcane Control Order, 1955. Prior to that Parliament had enacted the industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (Act.65 of 1951). It was held that the State Act was repugnant to … & R-5) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO a)

Pranav Bajpe Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

to respect the right of the child to preserve his or her identity, including nationality, name and family relations as recognized by law without unlawful interference.2. Where a child is illegally deprived of some or all of … the Union Parliament intended its legislation to be a complete and exhaustive code relating to the subject, it shall be taken that the Union law … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE09h DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY … and universities, subject to the provisions of entries 63, 64, 65 and 66 of List I; vocational … the Sugar Control Order, 1955 and the Sugarcane Control Order, 1955. Prior to that Parliament had enacted the industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (Act.65 of 1951). It was held that the State Act was repugnant to … & R-5) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO a)

Tv Today Network Limited vs News Laundry Media Private Limited and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

cross appeals have been preferred under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19081, assailing the judgment andorder dated 29.07.2022 passed by … constitute copyright infringement and attract liability under Sections 63 and 63A of the Copyright Act.v. It was … only when such copying is absolutely necessary. In support of this argument, reliance was placed on Super Cassettes Industries Limited v. Mr. Chintamani Rao & Ors.4. ii. The Defendants’ use of the Plaintiff’s copyrighted news broadcasts does … Plaintiff is part of the “India Today Group” and is engaged in broadcasting, publishing, e- commerce, and other related activities through its constituent companies. The Plaintiff claims that its channels and allied services have become household names, … to several crores for FY 2019-2020 and Rs. 92.49 crores for FY 2020-2021. It was also asserted that there has been no denial of this … argued that theDefendants have failed to comply with section 52A of the Copyright Act, 19573. Specifically, it

Newslaundry Media Pvt Ltd vs Tv Today Network Ltd and Ors & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

cross appeals have been preferred under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19081, assailing the judgment andorder dated 29.07.2022 passed by … constitute copyright infringement and attract liability under Sections 63 and 63A of the Copyright Act.v. It was … only when such copying is absolutely necessary. In support of this argument, reliance was placed on Super Cassettes Industries Limited v. Mr. Chintamani Rao & Ors.4. ii. The Defendants’ use of the Plaintiff’s copyrighted news broadcasts does … Plaintiff is part of the “India Today Group” and is engaged in broadcasting, publishing, e- commerce, and other related activities through its constituent companies. The Plaintiff claims that its channels and allied services have become household names, … to several crores for FY 2019-2020 and Rs. 92.49 crores for FY 2020-2021. It was also asserted that there has been no denial of this … argued that theDefendants have failed to comply with section 52A of the Copyright Act, 19573. Specifically, it

Kerala Gold and Silver Dealers Association, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

2 in the relevant Specification (IS 1417- 2016) whereby Unique alphanumeric ID Code (UAID Code) was insisted for every gold article as it unreasonably restricts … sales outlets was made compulsory. Later by Ext.P5 order, the hallmarking order 2020 was made applicable only to just 256 (out of 742) districts in … THRISSUR, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY P.M.RAFEEK, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMED, PUZHANKARA ILLATHU, KAIPPAMANGALAM, MOONUPEEDIKA, THRISSUR-680 681. … impugned Clause 6.1(a) of Ext.P7 exceeds the mandate of the BIS Act. Petitioners rely onthe judgment of JK Industries Limited and another v. Union of India and others (2007) 13 SCC 673, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory … main contention raised by the petitioners is that as perSection 2 (16) of BIS Act, hallmarking means in relation to a precious metal article the standard mark which indicates the proportionate content of precious metal in that … Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) is established under Section 3 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Act

All Kerala Gold and Silver Merchant Association vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

2 in the relevant Specification (IS 1417- 2016) whereby Unique alphanumeric ID Code (UAID Code) was insisted for every gold article as it unreasonably restricts … sales outlets was made compulsory. Later by Ext.P5 order, the hallmarking order 2020 was made applicable only to just 256 (out of 742) districts in … THRISSUR, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY P.M.RAFEEK, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMED, PUZHANKARA ILLATHU, KAIPPAMANGALAM, MOONUPEEDIKA, THRISSUR-680 681. … impugned Clause 6.1(a) of Ext.P7 exceeds the mandate of the BIS Act. Petitioners rely onthe judgment of JK Industries Limited and another v. Union of India and others (2007) 13 SCC 673, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory … main contention raised by the petitioners is that as perSection 2 (16) of BIS Act, hallmarking means in relation to a precious metal article the standard mark which indicates the proportionate content of precious metal in that … Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) is established under Section 3 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Act