Advanced Search Results

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Bangalore Metro Rail Corporati ...

Court : Karnataka

Union.8. Learned counsel for respondent No.1-Corporationwould submit that the application is filed under the Act, 1926 and under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, (Code, 2020) which came into effect from 21.11.2025, the Act of 1926 is repealed. And that being the … has held that the petitioner-Union cannot grant membership to the employees of respondent No.1-Corporation, who are working as Section Engineers, Junior Engineers, Customer Relations Officer and Station Controller/Train Operators.5. The Managing Director of respondent No.1-Corporation is of

Merin Mathew vs Union of India, Represented by Secretary,

Court : Kerala

Railway or major port, oil field or mine. Therefore, State Government will be the appropriate government.30. Going by the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, theIndustrial Employment Act will remain in force until it is repealed by a subsequent notification. Anything done or … 90 days to submit appeal. The 6th respondent also found that since 50% of shares of the 2nd respondent-company are owned by Air India Limited, … held that if the :8: petitioner is aggrieved by the report, she has to prefer appeal.11. As per Section 18(2) of the Act, 2013, the appealhas to be filed before the appellate authority notified under Section 2(a)

Glastronix Llp vs the President /General Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru.4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for thepetitioner would urge that the reference is invalid inasmuch as the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (Code, 2020) is notified with effect from 21.11.2025. In terms of -4- the said Code, 2020, the Government … that the notification dated08.12.2025 does not remove the difficulties and seeks to go beyond the powers conferred under Section 103 of the Code, 2020. On these grounds, it is urged that the notification at Annexure - G

Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs All India Ponds Employees Nalasangam and ...

Court : Chennai

as part of trade union activity.40. The statutory position also points in the same direction. Section 16 ofthe Industrial Relations Code, 2020 gives protection to a registered trade union, its office-bearers and members from civil proceedings in certain cases. It … blocking ingress and egress, and that they are willing to abide by any reasonable distance restriction, such as 50 or 100 metres from the entrance.28. On the above grounds, the respondents pray for dismissal of O.A.Nos.297, 298

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs General Secretary

Court : Karnataka

to contend that in identical situation the Court has restrained the strike.10. It is also submitted that under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, a provision similar to Section 22 is very much retained in Section 62.11. Learned counsel appearing for respondent

Amazon.com Nv Investment Holdings Llc Vs. Future Retail Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

purposes under all statutes, whether State or Central.” (emphasis supplied) 58. Mr. Viswanathan cited the judgment Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation v. Diamond & Gem Development Corporation Ltd., (2013) 5 SCC470 Far from supporting 82 … by the Board of Directors of FRL on 29 August 2020 in relation to the Disputed Transaction, including but not limited to filing or pursuing … made under Section 17(2) read with Order XXXIX, Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“Code of Civil Procedure”]. in which it was … Court, in Kandla Export Corporation v. OCI Corporation, (2018) 14 SCC715[“Kandla Export”]., held in the context of a Section 50 appeal as follows: “20. Given the judgment of this Court in Fuerst Day Lawson [Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd.

George Vattukulam vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Crime No. 281/2021 under section 379 read with 34 of the Penal Code has been registered in Meenangadi Police Station against 68 accused on 04/06/2021. … tree felling incidents in LA patta lands during 2020 & 2021 (as on 07.08.2021) are extracted hereunder: … of person Officer OR No. No. arrested 49 Johni Thomas Ramesan K N, OR 2/21 SFO, Parappa Kasargod section 50 Purushothaman Y Ramesan K N, OR 2/21 SFO, Parappa section 51 Anilkumar K B Shajeev, Dy RO OR … know that all the documents used for transporting timber woods from the district of Wayand to Malabar Timber Industries of Perumbavoor in Ernakulam District are forged and they were seized by the Forest Range Officer and other … cases have been registered in various Forest Ranges of the State in relation to tree felling incidents in the assigned lands. The details are tabulated

Sandeep Khaitan Vs. Jsvm Plywood Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to conditions.2. An application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, hereinafter referred to as the IBC was admitted on 26.08.2019 against … with law. It would appear that on 28.01.2020 interlocutory application 7 of 2020 filed by the former Managing Director of the Corporate Debtor seeking an … CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.447 OF2021(Arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.1549 of 2021) SANDEEP KHAITAN, RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL FOR NATIONAL PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES LTD. … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JSVM PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES LTD. & Anr. … RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.Leave granted.1. The … the impugned order is set aside.14. It is the case of the Respondent No.1 further that the business relationship between the Respondent No.1 and Corporate Debtor has existed for more than 15 years. The Corporate Debtor has

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

is submitted that the FATF was established by the Heads of State or Government of the seven major industrial nations (Group of Seven, G-7) joined by the President of the European Commission in a summit in Paris … Companies Act, 20136, the Prevention of Corruption Act, 19887, the Indian Penal Code, 18608 and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19739 which are also under … see: Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 2020 SCC OnLine SC882(Para88) 35 officer is not a … 87 20 • Arrest 88-90 • Burden of proof 91-103 • Special Courts 104-114 • Bail 115-149 • Section 50 of the 2002 Act 150-173 • Section 63 of the 2002 Act 174 • Schedule of the 2002 … with what has been held in Tofan Singh33 and establishes a direct relationship with the prohibition under Section 25 of the 1872 Act. Another crucial

Angul Energy Limited Formerily Known as Bhushan Energy Limited vs Mini ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

regime, the corporate debtor could indefinitely continue to enjoy the protection given under Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 or under other such enactments which has now been forsaken. Besides, the commercial wisdom of … referred to as “CIRP”) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “IBC”) was initiated against the Petitioner by … SCC OnLine Del 6987(2023) 10 SCC 60 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1147 2020 SCC Online Raj 1097 2022 SCC OnLine TS 130 KUMARI SHARMA W.P.(C) … detrimental to it as OCs were eligible to 50 per cent. of their crystallised claims whereas contingent … Liability towards any Operational Creditors and Other Creditors with regard to any claims (as defined under the IBC) relating in any manner to the period prior to the Closing Date (whether under Annexures 8, 9, 10, 11