Advanced Search Results

Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 2017; Section 100 (“authority subordinate to the Central Government” and “authority subordinate to the State Government”) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020. 40 for short, “1939 Act” 41 AIR1960SC1191(5-Judge Bench) 21 of the Madras High Court and of the High

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Bangalore Metro Rail Corporati ...

Court : Karnataka

Union.8. Learned counsel for respondent No.1-Corporationwould submit that the application is filed under the Act, 1926 and under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, (Code, 2020) which came into effect from 21.11.2025, the Act of 1926 is repealed. And that being the … has held that the petitioner-Union cannot grant membership to the employees of respondent No.1-Corporation, who are working as Section Engineers, Junior Engineers, Customer Relations Officer and Station Controller/Train Operators.5. The Managing Director of respondent No.1-Corporation is of

N a Sebastian & Anr. vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

quash thenotification dated 21.11.2025 whereby the said date was appointed as the date of coming into force of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code, 2020’). The notification was issued under sub- Section 3 of Section 1

Glastronix Llp vs the President /General Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru.4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for thepetitioner would urge that the reference is invalid inasmuch as the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (Code, 2020) is notified with effect from 21.11.2025. In terms of -4- the said Code, 2020, the Government … that the notification dated08.12.2025 does not remove the difficulties and seeks to go beyond the powers conferred under Section 103 of the Code, 2020. On these grounds, it is urged that the notification at Annexure - G … A/W SRI K ARAVIND KAMATH, ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL A/W SRI GOWTHAM DEV C ULLAL, CGC FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226AND

Merin Mathew vs Union of India, Represented by Secretary,

Court : Kerala

Railway or major port, oil field or mine. Therefore, State Government will be the appropriate government.30. Going by the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, theIndustrial Employment Act will remain in force until it is repealed by a subsequent notification. Anything done or … held that if the :8: petitioner is aggrieved by the report, she has to prefer appeal.11. As per Section 18(2) of the Act, 2013, the appealhas to be filed before the appellate authority notified under Section 2(a) … REPORT IN CRIMENO. 1411/2016 OF MUSEUM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PENDING AS C.C. NO. 131/2017 ON THE FILE OF JFCM-III, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM EXHIBIT P4 A COPY

Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs All India Ponds Employees Nalasangam and ...

Court : Chennai

as part of trade union activity.40. The statutory position also points in the same direction. Section 16 ofthe Industrial Relations Code, 2020 gives protection to a registered trade union, its office-bearers and members from civil proceedings in certain cases. It … and egress, and that they are willing to abide by any reasonable distance restriction, such as 50 or 100 metres from the entrance.28. On the above grounds, the respondents pray for dismissal of O.A.Nos.297, 298 and 299

The Secretary vs the Management

Court : Chennai

as one under Section 24 CPC.6. Under the Section 33-B(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Section92(1) of Industrial Relations Code,2020 which expressly provides that the appropriate Government may, by order in writing and for reasons to be … 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, since the number of employees/workmen involved is more than 100.4. Though this petition has been listed under the caption ‘For orders’, there is no representation for the petitioner

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs General Secretary

Court : Karnataka

to contend that in identical situation the Court has restrained the strike.10. It is also submitted that under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, a provision similar to Section 22 is very much retained in Section 62.11. Learned counsel appearing for respondent … REFINERIES LPG DISTRIBUTION, MARKETING DISTRIBUTION OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS. REPRESENTED BY ITS TERRITORY MANAGER,(LPG) SRI. ARVIND GOEL…PETITIONER (BY SRI C K SUBRAMANYA, ADVOCATE FOR Digitally SRI. B C PRABHAKAR.,ADVOCATE) signed by AND: PRAMILA G V Location: 1. GENERAL

The Management vs S.Vinothkumar

Court : Chennai

Petrochemicals and the respondent viz. Mr.S.Vinothkumar have entered into a memorandum of the settlement under Section 57(1) of the Industrial Relations Code 2020 and he has also produced a copy of the memorandum of settlement. The relevant portion of the settlement … to quash the order dated 09.10.2024 made in Memo. For Petitioner(s): MR.Sanjay Monhan for M/S.S.Ramasubramaniam For Respondent(s): M/S. C. D. SugumarORDERThis Writ Petition is filed seeking for quashment of the records connected with O.P.No.144 of 2023 on

Fact Workers Organisation vs Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Limi ...

Court : Kerala

not held the referendum for identifying the true bargaining agents of the workmen. Sections 6(2) and 6(4) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 clearly mandates that a registered trade union continue to have at least 10% of workers or 100 workers, … the workers. The CMD has not held the referendum for identifying the true bargaining agents of the workmen. Sections 6(2) and 6(4) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 clearly mandates that a registered trade union continue to