Advanced Search Results

N a Sebastian & Anr. vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

quash thenotification dated 21.11.2025 whereby the said date was appointed as the date of coming into force of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code, 2020’). The notification was issued under sub- Section 3 of Section 1

Glastronix Llp vs the President /General Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Bar and perused the records.11. The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 was notified with effect from 21.11.2025. Sub-section(3) of Section 1 of the Code, 2020 reads as under: -6- 1.Short title, extent and commencement - xxx"(3) It shall come … Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru.4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for thepetitioner would urge that the reference is invalid inasmuch as the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (Code, 2020) is notified with effect from 21.11.2025. In terms of -4- the said Code, 2020, the Government

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Bangalore Metro Rail Corporati ...

Court : Karnataka

Union.8. Learned counsel for respondent No.1-Corporationwould submit that the application is filed under the Act, 1926 and under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, (Code, 2020) which came into effect from 21.11.2025, the Act of 1926 is repealed. And that being the … by the employer of the industrial establishment, a negotiating council for negotiation on the matters referred to in sub-section (1), consisting of the representatives of such registered Trade Unions which have the support of not less than twenty

Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 2017; Section 100 (“authority subordinate to the Central Government” and “authority subordinate to the State Government”) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020. 40 for short, “1939 Act” 41 AIR1960SC1191(5-Judge Bench) 21 of the Madras High Court and of the High … 8.2 The District Magistrate/CMM is obliged to take possession once an application in that behalf is preferred under sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act by the secured creditor. 8.3 It is in the exercise of

Merin Mathew vs Union of India, Represented by Secretary,

Court : Kerala

Railway or major port, oil field or mine. Therefore, State Government will be the appropriate government.30. Going by the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, theIndustrial Employment Act will remain in force until it is repealed by a subsequent notification. Anything done or … held that if the :8: petitioner is aggrieved by the report, she has to prefer appeal.11. As per Section 18(2) of the Act, 2013, the appealhas to be filed before the appellate authority notified under Section 2(a) … MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 2ND PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 20163 OF 2022 PETITIONER: MERIN MATHEW AGED 37 YEARS D/O

M/s Creative Garments Ltd. Vs. Kashiram Verma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

4 category of Codes, namely, Wage Code, Social Security Code, Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code and The Industrial Relations Code. Different existing statutes, as consolidated in four Codes, are as under:1. Code on Wages, 2019 (i) The Payment … Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; (iv) The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976. 82. Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (i) The Factories Act, 1948; (ii) The Mines Act, 1952; (iii) The Dock Workers (Safety, Health and Welfare) … the permanent address of the workman is furnished in the pleadings.14. Under section 15(2) and section 16 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, if

Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs All India Ponds Employees Nalasangam and ...

Court : Chennai

as part of trade union activity.40. The statutory position also points in the same direction. Section 16 ofthe Industrial Relations Code, 2020 gives protection to a registered trade union, its office-bearers and members from civil proceedings in certain cases. It … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 16-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE AND OA NO. 299 OF 2026,OA NO. 298 OF 2026 in CS NO. 77

The Secretary vs the Management

Court : Chennai

as one under Section 24 CPC.6. Under the Section 33-B(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Section92(1) of Industrial Relations Code,2020 which expressly provides that the appropriate Government may, by order in writing and for reasons to be

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs General Secretary

Court : Karnataka

to contend that in identical situation the Court has restrained the strike.10. It is also submitted that under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, a provision similar to Section 22 is very much retained in Section 62.11. Learned counsel appearing for respondent … -1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 4615 OF 2026

The Management vs S.Vinothkumar

Court : Chennai

Petrochemicals and the respondent viz. Mr.S.Vinothkumar have entered into a memorandum of the settlement under Section 57(1) of the Industrial Relations Code 2020 and he has also produced a copy of the memorandum of settlement. The relevant portion of the settlement