Advanced Search Results

Liberty Footwear Company Vs. Force Footwear Company and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 83, 91(1), 92, 92(2), 92(3), 93, 100, 220(6), 254 and 255(5); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 149; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 196 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 7; Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Procedure) Rules, 2003 - Rule 14 and 14(1)

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC474(Del)

proceedings before IPAB are judicial proceedings under Sections 193, 228 and for the purpose of Section 196 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.5. It is well settled that quasi judicial tribunals … any order or decision passed by the Registrar, to IPAB w.e.f the date notified by the Central Government.4. Section 92 of the Act states that IPAB shall not be bound by the procedure laid down in the Code

Mohandas Vs. Jayarajan

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 177 to 182 and 182(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 417 and 420; Evidence Act - Sections 92

Reported in : 2001(2)ALT(Cri)213; 2001CriLJ3853

Sections 177 to 182 and 182 (1) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 34, 417 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 92 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - petitioners charged for offences under Sections 417 and 420

G.P. Pillai and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304A; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 92; General Clauses Act - Sections 26

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR1027]; ILR2005KAR381; 2005(2)KarLJ218

that the observations made during the course of this order are for the purpose of present petition only. INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 - SECTION 304A - FACTORIES ACT, 1948 - SECTION 92 - GENERAL CLAUSES ACT, SECTION 26 - Petitioners

L. Biakchhunga Vs. State of Mizoram and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963; North-Eastern Areas Reorganization Act, 1971 - Sections 77 and 79; Indian Limitation Act, 1908; Schedules Districts Act, 1874 - Sections 5 or 5A and 6; Assam Frontier Tracts Regulation, 1880; Assam Police Officers Regulation, 1883; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Government of India Act, 1919; Government of India Act, 1915; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 92(1) and 92(2); Assam Frontier Tracts Act, 1908 - Sections 2; Lushai Hills District (Change of Name) Act, 1954; Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Act, 1971; State of Mizoram Act, 1986 - Sections 13, 43 and 43(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(26); Government of India (Adaptation of Indian, Laws) Order, 1937; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 1(3) and 80; Lushai Hills Rules, 1937 - Rules 18

enactments, namely, The Scheduled Districts Act, 1874, Assam Frontier Tracts Regulation, 1880, Assam Police Officers Regulation, 1883 and the Indian Penal Code, 1860 were with effect from that date extended to the said area. With the enactment of the Government of … No. 5. As his request remained unheeded, he eventually served a notice dated 9.9.1998 before the respondent/defendants under Section 80 CPC and thereafter filed the suit. According to him, the cause of action there for had arisen … were required to be extended to such area by notification under Section 92(1) of the Government of India Act, 1935. Amendment or repeal of an

G. Somashekara Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 92; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320(2) and 320(8); Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control), Rules 1978 - Rules 10, 12 and 12(5); Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) (Repealed) Rules, 2004; Constitution of India - Article 311(2)

Reported in : 2009(4)KarLJ35; 2008(5)KCCRSN650

of a Teacher, inasmuch as, cases were foisted against him for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. It is not one but as many as 14 cases were foisted and during that relevant point of … Hence the respondent did not have any power to compulsorily retire the petitioner. He further submits that under Section 92 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (for short, 'the Act') the maximum period of suspension is only six

Dr. Tapas Roy Chowdhury Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 12A and 17; ;Negligent Act; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 207, 401 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 88, 92, 93, 279, 304A, 338 and 468(2); ;Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226

is:The Indian Penal Code enacted as far back as in the year 1860 sets out a few vocal examples. Section 88 in the Chapter on … on a pedestal different from ordinary mortals.30. The Apex Court in the said context referred to Section 88, Section 92 and Section 93 of the I.P.C. Observation of the Apex Court in that regard is:The Indian Penal Code … of the Metropolitan Magistrate, Kolkata, in connection with K2/D.D. Case No. 84 of 2004 under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code.2. Learned Court by the said order dismissed the application filed by the petitioner for his discharge.3. Grievances of

Jacob Mathew Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302,304A, 336, 337 and 338; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Criminal Law - Sections 88, 92 and 93

Reported in : 2005ACJ1840; AIR2005SC3180; 2005(2)ALD(Cri)334; 2005(5)ALD52(SC); 2005(3)AWC2756(SC); III(2005)CPJ9(SC); 2005CriLJ3710; 2005(4)CTC540; 122(2005)DLT83(SC); 2005(85)DRJ330; (; (2005) 6 SCC 1

the accused appellant under Section 304A/34 IPC is quashed.56. All the interlocutory applications be treated as disposed of. Indian Penal Code 1860 - Sections 34, 304A - Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 - Section 482 - Consumer Protection Act 1986 … provides exemption for acts not intended to cause death, done by consent in good faith for person's benefit. Section 92 provides for exemption for acts done in good faith for the benefit of a person without his consent

Rexnord Electronics and Controls Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28AA, 28AB, 125(1), 125(7), 127A, 127B and 127H; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992; Finance Act, 1998; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2008(126)ECC95; 2008(152)LC95(SC); 2008(224)ELT184(SC); JT2008(3)SC572; (2008)3MLJ960(SC); 2008(3)SCALE507; 2008AIRSCW2092; 2008(2)Supreme392.

as it may think fit to impose, immunity from prosecution for any offence under this Act or under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or under any other Central Act for the time being in force and also either … S.B. Sinha, J. 1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of the provisions of Section 127A read with Section 127H of the Customs Act is involved in this appeal which arises out of

Prabhu Shankar Agarwal and ors. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 47, 57 and 92; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 196 and 228; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 195; ;Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Procedure) Rules, 2003 - Rules 26, 27 and 27(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 10 - Order 9, Rules 7 and 13

judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228, and for the purpose of Section 196, of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860) and the Appellate Board shall be deemed to be a civil court for all the … is to be taken by the Board upon application of mind. He further contended that in terms of Section 92 of the Act, proceedings before the Board are not to be regulated by the Code of Civil Procedure

Dr. Sujoy Das Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 88, 92, 93 and 304A

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1148

medical professionals on a pedestal different from ordinary mortals. Then the Supreme Court referred to Sections 88,92,93 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which deal with general exceptions in relation to surgeons which save surgeons from criminal action. The Supreme Court … General Surgeon working for E.S.I. Hospital in Margao, Goa has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash and set aside the process issued against him