Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 80 · Page 1 of about 986 results (0.115 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 24 1961

K.M. Nanavati Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-24-1961

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 80, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 307 and 342; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 103, 105, 106 and 145; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1962SC605; (1962)64BOMLR488; [1962]Supp1SCR567

interference. The appeal stands dismissed. 156. Appeal dismissed. Criminal - provocation - Sections 80, 302 and 304 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant charged with murder - claim of incident occurred due to provocation of deceased - to entitle … case. To appreciate the scope of the alleged omissions, it is necessary to read the relevant provisions. 34. Section 80 of the Indian Penal Code. 'Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, and without

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1964

Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakker Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-19-1964

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 80, 84 and 299; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105, 137 and 154; Criminal law

Reported in : AIR1964SC1563; 1964CriLJ472; (1964)0GLR90; (1964)GLR911(SC); [1964]7SCR361

dismiss the appeal. 25. Appeal dismissed. Criminal - defence of insanity - Sections 80, 84, and 299 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 105, 137 and 154 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - appellant was husband of deceased and … us consider the material provisions without reference to decided cases. The said provisions are : INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 299 - Whoever causes death by doing an act with the intention of causing death, or with the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1998

Atmendra Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 80 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)373; AIR1998SC1985; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)53; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)350; 1998CriLJ2838; 1998(2)Crimes61(SC); JT1998(3)SC66; RLW1998(2)SC269; 1998(2)SCALE558; (1998)4SCC256; MANU/SC/0254/1998

no interference.7. The appeal, therefore, fails and it is accordingly dismissed. Criminal - intention - Section 80 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - matter related to applicability of Section 80 - Section 80 provides that if anything done by accident

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 19 1996

Naguloncha Krishna Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 80, 85, 302 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Evidence Act - Sections 32 and 32(1)

Reported in : 1997(1)ALD(Cri)577; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)730; 1997CriLJ2834

and placed on record. 16. Appeal dismissed. Criminal - murder - Sections 80, 85, 302 and 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 32 and 32 (1) of Indian Evidence Act - accused

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2004

Shankar Narayan Bhadolkar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-09-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 6, 34, 76 to 106, 201, 299, 300, 302, 304 and 304A; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 25(1A); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC1966; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)1020; 2004CriLJ1778; JT2004(3)SC211; 2004(3)SCALE78; (2005)9SCC71; 2004(2)LC861(SC)

trial. They were charged for commission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Appellant was alternatively charged for commission of offence punishable under Section 302, 201 and … which, did not find acceptance, was that there was no offence involved as the act was covered by Section 80 IPC. In any event, there was no element of culpability to bring home accusations of Section 302. At

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2002

Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-04-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 446, 451, 475, 475(1) and 482; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 80 and 81; Border Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3 to 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279 and 337; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 9; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125 and 126

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)433; 96(2002)DLT217; 2002(62)DRJ16

to change the decision at their own whims and convenience--Petition disposed of--Border Security Force Act, 1968, Section 80--Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 279/337.;BSF authorities appear to have decided not to produce the accused and to hold the trial in BSF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1957

Khem Chand Vs. the Union of India (Uoi )and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-13-1957

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 311(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80 - Order XIV, Rule 7

Reported in : AIR1958SC300; (1959)ILLJ167SC; (1958)IMLJ169(SC); [1958]1SCR1080; [1963]Supp1SCR229

30. Appeal allowed. Service - dismissal - Articles 136 and 311(2) of Constitution of India, Section 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 80 and Order 14 Rule 7 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - appellant dismissed from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1973

Dilbagh Rai Jarry Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-1973

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Railway Establishment Code - Rule 2044; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 509; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 6, Rule 18

Reported in : AIR1974SC130; [1973(27)FLR428]; 1974LabIC149; (1974)ILLJ164SC; (1974)3SCC554; [1974]2SCR178; 1974(6)LC1(SC); (1973)3SCC554

Labour and Industrial - payment - Section 15 (2) of Payment of Wages Act, 1936, Section 509 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 80 and Order 6 Rule 18 of CPC, 1908 and Rule 2044 of Railway Establishment Code - whether claim

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1958

State of Bombay Vs. Devakinandan Kanhyalal Agarwal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-13-1958

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 403, 405, 406 and 477A; ;Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 80, 88, 94 and 96

Reported in : AIR1959Bom486; (1958)60BOMLR1413; 1959CriLJ1302; ILR1959Bom670

a partnership firm can be held to be guilty of criminal breach of trust within Section 405 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in respect of a partnership asset.;The scope of Section 477A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, is not … extent necessary to satisfy the just demands of those other partners. This section is to be read with Section 80, which provides that an obligation in the nature of a trust is created in cases covered by 'the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2015

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Appasaheb Balajee Parkhe and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jan-15-2015

Subject : Criminal

of her husband. As such, definition of the term “cruelty” also assumes importance. Explanation to Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, defines “cruelty”. It would be proper to reproduce Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code as respondents / … by the Hon'ble Apex Court in HiralalV/s State, Government of NCT of Delhi reported at (2003) 8 SCC 80. Paragraph 8 of the said ruling reads thus: “8. Section 304-B IPC which deal with dowry death, reads

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial