Advanced Search Results
Regula Bruhaspathi Rao Vs. State of A.P. and Another
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-05-1998
Trusts and Societies
Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 79, 83, 83-A(2) and 129-A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 409, 465 and 477-A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 239; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 1991; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules, 1964 - Rule 72(5)
1998(4)ALD689; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)195; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)596
Act, or for, any offence committed by an officer, employees or any member of the Society punishable under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by notification, in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette constituted as many Special Courts as may be necessary for such … only such of those offences arising under the provisions of the Act. The learned Counsel places reliance upon Section 79 of the Act and submits that only those offences enumerated in Section 79 could be tried by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Orissa Vs. Bhagaban Barik
Supreme Court of India
Apr-02-1987
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 52, 79, 99, 304 and 307
AIR1987SC1265; 1987CriLJ1115; JT1987(2)SC96; 1987(1)SCALE712; (1987)2SCC498; [1987]2SCR785
High Court should have given credence to the defence plea of mistake of fact under Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The evidence on record shows that the respondent and the deceased had strained relations over grazing of catties.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Sharad Kharkar Vs. Mukund Martand Chitnis and anr.
Mumbai
Mar-22-1991
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 79, 499 and 500
1991(3)BomCR253; 1991(1)MhLj1153
simple imprisonment for a period of one month. Criminal - defamation - Sections 79, 499 and 500 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant-complainants appeal against acquittal of respondent charged for defamation - respondent had filed caveat and made certain … the caveat was founded on good faith.11. Learned Counsel Shri Anturkar, however also referred to the provisions of section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, contained in Chapter IV on General exceptions. Section 79 on which he appears
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vijay @ Rinku vs.state
Delhi
Aug-02-2018
Criminal
in Sessions Case No.114/2010 arising out of FIR No.532/2007, registered at PS Mukherjee Nagar under Sections 364/392/302/201/411/120B/202/216 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter Crl.A.1341/2012 Page 1 of 89 referred to as “IPC”) whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence … District Courts, Rohini in Sessions Case No.114/2010 arising out of FIR No.532/2007, registered at PS Mukherjee Nagar under Sections 364/392/302/201/411/120B/202/216 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter Crl.A.1341/2012 Page 1 of 89 referred to as “IPC”) whereby … was no number plate on the front of the vehicle. Crl.A.1341/2012 Page 79 of 89 101. Significantly, the Tavera vehicle in question was at PS
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. G.B. Ghatge
Mumbai
Sep-14-1948
Criminal
(1949)51BOMLR103
and the sentence passed upon him. The fine, if paid, be refunded. Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Sections 88, 89, 90, 92, 79, 323-School-master-Punishment on erring pupil-Moderate and reasonable corporal punishment-Liability of school-master.;A head-master, who … Booth [1893] 1 Q.B. 465.4. In India, the question must be decided by reference to the provisions of the Indian Penal Code. Section 89 of the Code states that nothing which is done in good faith for the benefit of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSyed Jaferuklah Jaferi Vs. Abdul Aziz and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-03-1969
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197; Wakfs Act, 1954 - Sections 65; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295A, 341, 426, 448 and 454
AIR1970AP13; 1970CriLJ26
Procedure Code, 1898, Section 65 of Wakfs Act, 1954 and Sections 295A, 341, 426, 448 and 454 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - complaint against respondents for offences under Sections 295-A, 341, 426, 448 and 454 - whether respondents protected … justified by law, it would not amount to an offence at all in view of the provisions of Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code. Many cases may however arise where in acting under the provisions of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-03-2007
CriminalNarcotics
Indian Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 12, 24, 29, 37 and 67; ;Control Substances Act; Information Technology Act - Sections 8 and 79; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116
2008(221)ELT20(SC); (2008)2SCC294; 2007AIRSCW7902; 2008(2)SCC294; (2008)1SCC(Cri)346; 2008(1)Crimes26; 2008(2)KCCR865;
of such abetment or in pursuance of such criminal conspiracy, and notwithstanding anything contained in Section 116 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), be punishable with the punishment provided for the offence.(2) A person abets, or is a … Mr. Tulsi that service providers such as the two companies which were intermediaries were protected from prosecution by Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. An affidavit in reply has also been filed on behalf of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Barendra Kumar Ghose
Kolkata
Sep-26-1923
Land Acquisition
81Ind.Cas.353
examine, in the first instance, the terms of Section 34.74. In the Indian Penal Code, as enacted in 1860, Section 34 was expressed in the following terms :When a criminal act is done by several persons, each of … Justice Page and a Special Jury, on a charge of offences punishable under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code. He pleaded not guilty to the first count and guilty to the second count. The Jury returned a … Railway Co. (1892) App. Cas. 481 at p. 487 : 61 L.J.P.C. 79 : 67 L.T. 505 and of Lord Macnaghten in Narendra, Nath v.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskColgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. Vs. Shri Satish Rohra and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-12-2005
CriminalIntellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 78 and 79; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 402; Drugs Act, 1940; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 200, 202 and 482
2005(4)MPHT337; 2005(4)MPLJ380
the order dated 25-11-1999 passed by the aforesaid Court, taking cognizance of offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.2. Complainant Satish Rohra, a resident
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAditya Rotor SpIn (P) Ltd., Kanpur and Another Vs. U.P. State Electric ...
Allahabad
Feb-22-1991
Electricity
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49 and 79; Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Supply (Consumers) Regulations, 1984 - Regulations 1, 9, 21, 22, 22(D) & (B) and 23; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 22(B), 26(3) & (6) and 39; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2 and 379; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 26, 26(1) & (7) and 44; Delhi Road Transport Act; Central Inland Water Transport Corporation (Service, discipline and appeals) Rules - Rule 9(1)
AIR1991All196; II(1991)DMC118
whoever dishonestly abstracts, consumes or uses any energy shall be deemed to have committed theft within themeaning of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860) and the existence of artificial means for such abstraction shall be prima facie evidence of … prevention or improper use, as the case may be, has been knowingly and wilfully caused by such consumer Section 79 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, provides that the Board may make regulations for all or any of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »