Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 79 · Page 1 of about 691 results (0.054 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 05 1998

Regula Bruhaspathi Rao Vs. State of A.P. and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-05-1998

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 79, 83, 83-A(2) and 129-A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 409, 465 and 477-A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 239; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 1991; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules, 1964 - Rule 72(5)

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD689; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)195; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)596

Act, or for, any offence committed by an officer, employees or any member of the Society punishable under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by notification, in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette constituted as many Special Courts as may be necessary for such … only such of those offences arising under the provisions of the Act. The learned Counsel places reliance upon Section 79 of the Act and submits that only those offences enumerated in Section 79 could be tried by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1987

State of Orissa Vs. Bhagaban Barik

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-02-1987

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 52, 79, 99, 304 and 307

Reported in : AIR1987SC1265; 1987CriLJ1115; JT1987(2)SC96; 1987(1)SCALE712; (1987)2SCC498; [1987]2SCR785

High Court should have given credence to the defence plea of mistake of fact under Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The evidence on record shows that the respondent and the deceased had strained relations over grazing of catties.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1991

Mohan Sharad Kharkar Vs. Mukund Martand Chitnis and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-22-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 79, 499 and 500

Reported in : 1991(3)BomCR253; 1991(1)MhLj1153

simple imprisonment for a period of one month. Criminal - defamation - Sections 79, 499 and 500 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant-complainants appeal against acquittal of respondent charged for defamation - respondent had filed caveat and made certain … the caveat was founded on good faith.11. Learned Counsel Shri Anturkar, however also referred to the provisions of section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, contained in Chapter IV on General exceptions. Section 79 on which he appears

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 2018

Vijay @ Rinku vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-02-2018

Subject : Criminal

in Sessions Case No.114/2010 arising out of FIR No.532/2007, registered at PS Mukherjee Nagar under Sections 364/392/302/201/411/120B/202/216 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter Crl.A.1341/2012 Page 1 of 89 referred to as “IPC”) whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence … District Courts, Rohini in Sessions Case No.114/2010 arising out of FIR No.532/2007, registered at PS Mukherjee Nagar under Sections 364/392/302/201/411/120B/202/216 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter Crl.A.1341/2012 Page 1 of 89 referred to as “IPC”) whereby … was no number plate on the front of the vehicle. Crl.A.1341/2012 Page 79 of 89 101. Significantly, the Tavera vehicle in question was at PS

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1948

Emperor Vs. G.B. Ghatge

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-14-1948

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1949)51BOMLR103

and the sentence passed upon him. The fine, if paid, be refunded. Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Sections 88, 89, 90, 92, 79, 323-School-master-Punishment on erring pupil-Moderate and reasonable corporal punishment-Liability of school-master.;A head-master, who … Booth [1893] 1 Q.B. 465.4. In India, the question must be decided by reference to the provisions of the Indian Penal Code. Section 89 of the Code states that nothing which is done in good faith for the benefit of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1969

Syed Jaferuklah Jaferi Vs. Abdul Aziz and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-03-1969

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197; Wakfs Act, 1954 - Sections 65; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295A, 341, 426, 448 and 454

Reported in : AIR1970AP13; 1970CriLJ26

Procedure Code, 1898, Section 65 of Wakfs Act, 1954 and Sections 295A, 341, 426, 448 and 454 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - complaint against respondents for offences under Sections 295-A, 341, 426, 448 and 454 - whether respondents protected … justified by law, it would not amount to an offence at all in view of the provisions of Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code. Many cases may however arise where in acting under the provisions of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2007

Sanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-2007

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 12, 24, 29, 37 and 67; ;Control Substances Act; Information Technology Act - Sections 8 and 79; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116

Reported in : 2008(221)ELT20(SC); (2008)2SCC294; 2007AIRSCW7902; 2008(2)SCC294; (2008)1SCC(Cri)346; 2008(1)Crimes26; 2008(2)KCCR865;

of such abetment or in pursuance of such criminal conspiracy, and notwithstanding anything contained in Section 116 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), be punishable with the punishment provided for the offence.(2) A person abets, or is a … Mr. Tulsi that service providers such as the two companies which were intermediaries were protected from prosecution by Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. An affidavit in reply has also been filed on behalf of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1923

Emperor Vs. Barendra Kumar Ghose

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-26-1923

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 81Ind.Cas.353

examine, in the first instance, the terms of Section 34.74. In the Indian Penal Code, as enacted in 1860, Section 34 was expressed in the following terms :When a criminal act is done by several persons, each of … Justice Page and a Special Jury, on a charge of offences punishable under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code. He pleaded not guilty to the first count and guilty to the second count. The Jury returned a … Railway Co. (1892) App. Cas. 481 at p. 487 : 61 L.J.P.C. 79 : 67 L.T. 505 and of Lord Macnaghten in Narendra, Nath v.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2005

Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. Vs. Shri Satish Rohra and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-12-2005

Subject : CriminalIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 78 and 79; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 402; Drugs Act, 1940; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 200, 202 and 482

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT337; 2005(4)MPLJ380

the order dated 25-11-1999 passed by the aforesaid Court, taking cognizance of offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.2. Complainant Satish Rohra, a resident

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1991

Aditya Rotor SpIn (P) Ltd., Kanpur and Another Vs. U.P. State Electric ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-22-1991

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49 and 79; Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Supply (Consumers) Regulations, 1984 - Regulations 1, 9, 21, 22, 22(D) & (B) and 23; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 22(B), 26(3) & (6) and 39; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2 and 379; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 26, 26(1) & (7) and 44; Delhi Road Transport Act; Central Inland Water Transport Corporation (Service, discipline and appeals) Rules - Rule 9(1)

Reported in : AIR1991All196; II(1991)DMC118

whoever dishonestly abstracts, consumes or uses any energy shall be deemed to have committed theft within themeaning of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860) and the existence of artificial means for such abstraction shall be prima facie evidence of … prevention or improper use, as the case may be, has been knowingly and wilfully caused by such consumer Section 79 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, provides that the Board may make regulations for all or any of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial