Advanced Search Results

Bandrappa Vs. State by Gadigenur Police

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 378, 379 and 420; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 4(1A), 21 and 22; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 70; Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1969

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3190; 2007(3)KLJ183; 2007(4)AIRKarR94; 2007(3)KarLJ183

Gadigenur Police Station, Sandur Taluk, which is registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 379 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 4( 1-A) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as … case of T.L. Chcmnegowda v. State of Karnataka and Ors. 1994 (4) Kar. L.J. 564, he argued that Section 70 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, does not prohibit the petitioner to extract and transport the minerals.

Shanti Lal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 27, 27(2), 56, 57, 57(1), 58, 58(1), 59, 60, 65 and 65(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40, 41, 42, 63 to 70 and 304; Towns Nuisances Act (Madras), 1889 - Sections 3 and 3(10); Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923; Bihar Wakfs Act, 1947 - Sections 58; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 29, 30, 30(1) and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2814; 2008CriLJ386; JT2007(12)SC1; 2008(1)KLT503(SC); 2008(1)MPHT1(SC)

18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 63 to 70 of the of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Accused-Appellant found to be in possession of

Palakdhari Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 70 and 379; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 52 and 54; Evidence Act - Sections 83; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Limitation Act - Sections 94; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules - Rule 82

Reported in : AIR1962SC1145; [1962]Supp2SCR650

conviction would be barred after the expiry of six years - The Court ruled that Section 70 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was applicable to the convictions by the panchayati adalats and that the recovery of the fine was not

P.V. Muhammed Vs. the Collector of Palghat

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 15; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 386(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 70

Reported in : AIR1967Ker254; [1967]19STC475(Ker)

Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, Section 386 (1) (b)of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Section 70 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - whether execution petition barred by limitation under Section 70 as claimed by appellant - execution of warrant

Ramaswamy Iyer Agnellus Lawrence Gopalan Vs. the Union of India and an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalLimitation

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 68, 69, 70 and 409; Army Act - Sections 3, 69 and 174; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 386, 386(2) and 386(3) - Schedule - Rules 5, 10 and 11

Reported in : AIR1963Bom21; (1962)64BOMLR440; 1963CriLJ152; ILR1962Bom523

Army Act for realization of amount of fine imposed by Court Martial.;The expression 'levy' in Section 70 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, means to seize for the purposes of collecting the fine or to enforce an execution for a certain

P.R. Anjanappa and anr. Vs. Yurej Agencies Private Limited and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 377, 378 and 394(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 66 to 70

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2565; ILR2004KAR1883

the appeal from sentence of fine, which, even in case of death of appellant/accused does not abate.; (B) INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 - SECTION 70 - The liability of paying the fine, whether devolves upon the successors - HELD -

Megha Arora vs State of Karnataka by

Court : Karnataka

3(1)(r)(s) OF The SCHEDULED CASTES AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989 AND SEC.504, 506 OF IPC 1860 AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:-3- … any better economic or social position when compared to the victim. Despite the rampant prevalence of segregation in Indian-9-villages whereby members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe community are forced to restrict their quartes only to … THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3997 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MEGHA ARORA, D/O CHANDRA KANT ARORA, … the registration of crime in Crime No.58/2024 for the offences punishable under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) … on the file of the Court of CCH LXX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru.2. Learned

Raghuvansh Dewanchand Bhasin. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 70, 71; Constitution of India. - Article 21, 22(1), 32, 226

Harchandrai filed a complaint, being C.C. No. 163/P/2000, against the appellant, a practicing Advocate, under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the IPC ), in relation to some incident alleged to have taken place in the `Radio … the appellant had failed to appear in court on 7th August 2002. It was asserted that since neither Section 70 nor Section 71 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the Code ) uses the expression

Deranda Aiyappa @ Dalu Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused for the alleged offences. In this regard, it is required to refer to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which reads thus: “34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.-When a criminal act is … justice. The fine amount imposed by the Trial Court shall be intact and to modified the fine amount.-. 70 - NC:2023. KHC:23342-DB CRL.A No.665 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.641 of 2017 CRL.A No.833 of 2017 CRL.A No.943

Biddanda Kunjappa @ Jeevan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused for the alleged offences. In this regard, it is required to refer to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which reads thus: “34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.-When a criminal act is … justice. The fine amount imposed by the Trial Court shall be intact and to modified the fine amount.-. 70 - NC:2023. KHC:23342-DB CRL.A No.665 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.641 of 2017 CRL.A No.833 of 2017 CRL.A No.943