Advanced Search Results

State Bank of India and ors. Vs. R.B. Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409, 420 and 467; State Bank of India Officers Service Rules - Rules 67 and 68; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR2004SC4144; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)1115; 2004(3)AWC2699(SC); 99(2005)CLT1(SC); 113(2004)DLT25(SC); [2004(102)FLR1027]; JT2004(6)SC361; (2004)IIILLJ528SC; (2005)1MLJ36(SC); RLW2

Police on 12.5.1994 for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The FIR was registered in respect of the employee and the other persons for … complaint was lodged with the Crime Branch. Delhi Police on 12.5.1994 for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The FIR … submitted at the appropriate stage. Charge-sheet in terms of Rules 67 and 68 of the State Bank of India Officers Service Rules (in short the

Aseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

No.3480/2015, have been summoned for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sectionsread with Section 32 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act-2003, hereinafter referred to as COTPA2003 and proceedings … chances of further damage. which make them grossly liable. CRL.M.C22082015, 2209/ 2015 & 3480/2015 Page 61 of 142 68. Written submissions were filed on behalf of the each of the petitioners on 14.05.2018.69. The petitioner Aseem Kapoor,

Pappu and anr. Vs. Rekha and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3), 190, 190(1), 190(2), 200, 202, 211(7), 243, 244 to 250, 325, 360 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 68, 69, 406 and 498A

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3728; 2006(4)WLC549

thirty days.(4) When any person is imprisoned under Sub-section (3), the provisions of Sections 68 and 69 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) shall, so far as may be, apply.(5) No person who has been directed to pay

Paras Nath and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 386(1), 401 and 401(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 64, 68 and 69

Reported in : AIR1969All116; 1969CriLJ350

the sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of the fine, are Sections 64, 68 and 69 of the Indian Penal Code. These Sections stand thus:--'64. In every case of an offence punishable with imprisonment as well as fine, in … - Sections 386(1) Proviso and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Sections 64, 68 and 69 of Penal Code, 1860 - sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of fine - punishment meant for failure to pay the … the fine still unpaid, the imprisonment shall terminate.' There is no provision in the Indian Penal Code like Section 68 providing that, on the undergoing of the whole period of imprisonment, the fine shall not be recoverable. The

K.C. Bajaj Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan Civil Services (Service Matters Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1976 - Sections 5, 6, 6(1) and 22(3); Rajasthan Civil Services (Service Matters Appellate Tribunal) Rules - Rule 28; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 114 - Order 47, Rule 1; Rajasthan Services of Engineers (Public Health Branch) Rules, 1968 - Rule 25(11-A); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 345 and 346; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 68; East Punjab Holdings (Constitution and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act - Sections 42 and 76A; Industrial Disputes Act

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC556

before the Tribunal shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of Section 193 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. 4. The Tribunal shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Section 345 and … in dismissing the writ petition on the ground that an alternative remedy was available to the appellant under Section 68 of the U.P. State Universities Act. Decision of Allahabad High Court Revised.' (24). In Patel Narshi Thakershi v.

Deranda Aiyappa @ Dalu Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused for the alleged offences. In this regard, it is required to refer to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which reads thus: “34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.-When a criminal act is … KHC:23342-DB CRL.A No.665 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.641 of 2017 CRL.A No.833 of 2017 CRL.A No.943 of 2020 68. In the instant case, Accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 have caused bullet injuries over the person of Dilip

Biddanda Kunjappa @ Jeevan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused for the alleged offences. In this regard, it is required to refer to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which reads thus: “34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.-When a criminal act is … KHC:23342-DB CRL.A No.665 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.641 of 2017 CRL.A No.833 of 2017 CRL.A No.943 of 2020 68. In the instant case, Accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 have caused bullet injuries over the person of Dilip

Sri Chottera A Erappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused for the alleged offences. In this regard, it is required to refer to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which reads thus: “34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.-When a criminal act is … KHC:23342-DB CRL.A No.665 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.641 of 2017 CRL.A No.833 of 2017 CRL.A No.943 of 2020 68. In the instant case, Accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 have caused bullet injuries over the person of Dilip

Biddanda Pemmaiah @ Prithvi Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused for the alleged offences. In this regard, it is required to refer to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which reads thus: “34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.-When a criminal act is … KHC:23342-DB CRL.A No.665 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.641 of 2017 CRL.A No.833 of 2017 CRL.A No.943 of 2020 68. In the instant case, Accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 have caused bullet injuries over the person of Dilip

Maharudrappa Danappa Kesarappanavar Vs. the State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901; Bombay District Municipal Rules, 1901 - Rule 68

Reported in : AIR1961SC785; 1961CriLJ857; (1961)IILLJ402SC; [1962]1SCR129

- public servant - Sections 2 and 5 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 21 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901 and Rule 68 of Bombay District Municipal Rules, 1901 - conviction of chairman