Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 67 · Page 1 of about 856 results (0.125 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 26 2001

Shahid Khan Vs. Director of Revenue Intelligence

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-2001

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 22, 23, 25, 27A, 28, 29, 42, 42(1), 42(2) and 67; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 132; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 139 and 228

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)781; 2001CriLJ3183

shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of section 193 and section 228 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.' 57. The wording used in Section 67 of NDPS Act is quite different from the wording used in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1998

P.V. Prabhakara Rao Vs. Enforcement Directorate

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-11-1998

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 5(1), 13, 18(1), 19(1), 40, 40(3), 43, 43(2), 43(4), 44(2), 56, 57, 58 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 132; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 174, 193 and 228

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD677; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)613; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)392; 1998CriLJ2507

amount or value involved in such contravention - such contravention also amounts to offence under Section 174 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - offender to be prosecuted under FERA as it is special Act and always preferable over general Act … A separate provision is made for punishing such contraventions under other relevant provisions of the Act. For instances, Section 67 of the Act provides for contravention of the provisions of Section 13, Section 18(1)(a) and Section 19(1)(a), Similarly,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2013

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-22-2013

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’ for short) and Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81 and 83 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, … Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1281 of 2012 whereby the High Court dismissed his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) seeking regular bail in C.R. No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2004

The Intelligence Officer and ors. Vs. Arshad Saleem Khan and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-2004

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psyscotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sectons 42, 41(2), 50, 53, 53A, 53(3), 66 and 67; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 174 and 175

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4496; ILR2004KAR3855

this summons without law-full excuses, you will be liable to be punished under Section 174 and 175 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.Given under my hand and seal of office today the 8th day of November 1996.Sd/ - R. Kiran GaikwadI/O … is admissible evidence and could be used against the accused and also against the co-accused. The I.O. under Section 67 can summon any person including the accused for purpose of enquiry and can record the statement.17. It is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2004

State Bank of India and ors. Vs. R.B. Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-10-2004

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409, 420 and 467; State Bank of India Officers Service Rules - Rules 67 and 68; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR2004SC4144; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)1115; 2004(3)AWC2699(SC); 99(2005)CLT1(SC); 113(2004)DLT25(SC); [2004(102)FLR1027]; JT2004(6)SC361; (2004)IIILLJ528SC; (2005)1MLJ36(SC); RLW2

Police on 12.5.1994 for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The FIR was registered in respect of the employee and the other persons for … complaint was lodged with the Crime Branch. Delhi Police on 12.5.1994 for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The FIR … shall be submitted at the appropriate stage. Charge-sheet in terms of Rules 67 and 68 of the State Bank of India Officers Service Rules (in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2003

Siyaka Marong Abdoulaya Vs. Mr. J.L. Pandey, Inspector of Customs (P) ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-28-2003

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 29 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108 and 135; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 132; Evidence Act - Sections 32

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)108; 2003BomCR(Cri)1826

failure to do so would invite a prosecution for offences indicated by Sections 193 and Section 228 of Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). They are entitled to get the benefit of exemption under Section 132 of the Code … present appellant in her statement recorded by the said officers which was recorded in view of provisions of Section 67 of the NDPS Act. It surfaced in her statement that Camara Mamadi and herself stayed at Delhi at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1981

Shaikh Farid Hussinsab Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-09-1981

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Evidence Act - Sections 67, 71 and 157

Reported in : 1981MhLJ345

Division Bench for disposal in accordance with law.20. Reference answered accordingly. Criminal - murder - Section 294 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 67, 71 and 157 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - evidentiary value of post mortem report

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2008

Maqbool Fida HusaIn Vs. Raj Kumar Pandey

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2008

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Communication Decency Act, 1996; Online Services Act; Summary Offences Act; Obscene Publications Act, 1959; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; Sections 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000; Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971; Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 163(8), 177, 178, 179, 186, 200, 202, 204 and 406; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 292, 292(1), 294, 298 and 500; Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1) and 19(2)

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4107

from the American law.India29. The general law of obscenity in India can be found in Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which reads as under:Section 292. Sale, etc., of obscene books, etc.-[(1)] For the purposes of Sub-section (2) book, … question of whether the impugned matter falls within any of the exceptions contained in the section would arise.32. Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 relevant for the subject under discussion reads as follows:67. Publishing of information

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2008

Moideenkutty Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-03-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 122(7), 125, 125(3), 128, 250(3), 345(1), 358(2), 358(3), 359, 446 and 488; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53 and 67; General Clauses Act - Sections 3 and 3(27); Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3402; 2008(2)KLJ741

I do find merit in this contention of the learned Counsel.20. The learned Counsel then points out that Section 67 of the Indian Penal Code is of crucial relevance in the present context. Section 67 declares that where … of either description as defined in the Indian Penal Code; (45 of 1860).12. The definition of the expression imprisonment as such is not available in … such liability to undergo imprisonment cannot be held to be a punishment as contemplated under Section 53 of the Indian Penal Code.8. The decision of the Supreme Court in Kuldip Kaur v. Surinder Singh : 1989CriLJ794 makes the position crystal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1957

BashiruddIn Ashraf Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-1957

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33; Bihar Waqfs Act, 1947 - Sections 58 and 65; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1957SC645; 1958(6)BLJR1; 1957CriLJ1023; [1957]1SCR1032

appeal is accordingly dismissed. 11. Appeal dismissed. Trusts and Societies - removal - Sections 40 and 67 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 33 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 58 and 65 of Bihar Waqfs Act, 1947 and Article 19(1)(g)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial