Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 66 · Page 1 of about 909 results (0.089 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 27 2003

P.R. Anjanappa and anr. Vs. Yurej Agencies Private Limited and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-27-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 377, 378 and 394(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 66 to 70

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2565; ILR2004KAR1883

the appeal from sentence of fine, which, even in case of death of appellant/accused does not abate.; (B) INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 - SECTION 70 - The liability of paying the fine, whether devolves upon the successors - HELD - … risk of only those persons mentioned in the policy and the said vehicle being used in contravention of Section 66 of the Act, there is a violation of the policy conditions by the insured and as the claimants

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2004

The Intelligence Officer and ors. Vs. Arshad Saleem Khan and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-2004

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psyscotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sectons 42, 41(2), 50, 53, 53A, 53(3), 66 and 67; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 174 and 175

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4496; ILR2004KAR3855

this summons without law-full excuses, you will be liable to be punished under Section 174 and 175 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.Given under my hand and seal of office today the 8th day of November 1996.Sd/ - R. Kiran GaikwadI/O … substantive evidence for corroboration.15. The source for the admissibility of the voluntary statement of an accused is under Section 66 of the N.D.P.S.Act as follows.'66. Presumption as to documents in certain cases:- where any document(i) is produced or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2013

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-22-2013

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’ for short) and Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81 and 83 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, … Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1281 of 2012 whereby the High Court dismissed his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) seeking regular bail in C.R. No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 18 2018

Aseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2018

Subject : Criminal

No.3480/2015, have been summoned for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sectionsread with Section 32 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act-2003, hereinafter referred to as COTPA2003 and proceedings … conversion of one kind of tenement into another kind”. CRL.M.C22082015, 2209/ 2015 & 3480/2015 Page 59 of 142 66. Inter alia it was submitted on behalf of the sister of the injured and also on behalf of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1984

Gulam Dastagir Khan S/O. Gulzar Khan, Advocate and ors. Vs. Aziz Ahmed ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-1984

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120, 405, 406, 409, 464, 418, 420 and 465; Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 18, 36A and 66

Reported in : 1984(2)BomCR729

(1) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 34, 120, 405, 406, 409, 464, 418, 420 and 465 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 18, 36A and 66 of Wakf Act, 1954 - whether complaint not maintainable on ground that … of anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act. According to section 66, the Commissioner, every auditor, every Officer and servant of the Board and every other person duly appointed to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2010

Sergeant B. K. Mehta of 2305 Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Jun-04-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

criminal liability. It is noteworthy that the standard of proof as also culpability requirements under section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code stands on an altogether different footing. But in determining whether negligence or rashness existed in the present case … held the accused guilty for the offences under Section 71 Air Force Act, 1950 R/w. Section 304A IPC, 1860, Section 71 R/w. Section 201 IPC and offences under Section 42(e) of the Air Force Act, 1950 and dismissed … Martial deviated from the Rules by not putting the evidence against the accused-appellant to him as required under section 66 (4) of the Air Force Act. 2. It is next contended that on 06.11.1994 the convoy comprising Sqn

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 28 1984

Thakore Chandrasingh Taktsingh Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-28-1984

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363 and 366; Bombay Police Act, 1951; Bombay Prohibition Act - Sections 66(1); Gujarat Civil Services (Conduct) Rule, 1971; All India Service (Conduct) Rules, 1968 - Rule 3; Uttar Pradesh Disciplinary (Administrative Tribunal) Rules, 1947 - Rules 2 and 4(1)

Reported in : (1985)2GLR701; (1986)ILLJ27Guj

dismissal from service - Articles 14, 16 and 226 of Constitution of India, Sections 363 and 366 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Bombay Police Act, 1951, Section 66 (1) of Bombay Prohibition Act, Gujarat Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968, Rule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2009

Sanjeev Nanda Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-20-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 183, 184, 185, 185(1), 203 and 204; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 85, 201, 299, 299(3), 279, 300, 300(4), 302, 304, 304A, 311, 420 and 498A; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 6, 25, 27, 45, 74, 145 and 165; Road Safety Act, 1967 - Sections 1(1); Road Traffic Act, 1972 - Sections 6(1) and 10(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 117; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 36, 161, 161(3), 162, 162(1), 164, 165, 172(2), 173, 173(2), 173(8), 258, 309, 310, 311, 313, 340, 360 and 482; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 66; Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; Probation of Offenders Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39A, 136, 226 and 227; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 16 and 252A

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT775

person willfully drives into a crowd then the case cannot be taken to be one under Section 304A Indian Penal Code, 1860. It is worth mentioning here and as already discussed above, the Hon'ble Supreme Court settled the legal position … a drunken state knowing fully well that consumption of liquor and possession of the same is prohibited under Section 66 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and ran over poor persons who were sleeping on the footpath of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1986

State of Assam Vs. Muhim Barkataki and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-1986

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 164 and 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 436

Reported in : AIR1987SC98; 1987CriLJ152; 1986(3)Crimes586(SC); 1986(2)SCALE607; (1986)4SCC439; [1986]3SCR1038; 1986(2)LC728(SC)

Procedure Code Exts. 6 and 4, we find that the charges under Section 382/34 and Section 436/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 has been proved by the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt against the two accused persons. They were rightly convicted … Ray, J.1. This appeal by special leave is against the judgment and order passed in Criminal Appeal No. 66 of 1983 by the High Court of Gauhati acquiring both the accused respondents from the charges under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2015

Rajesh and Others Vs. State and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-09-2015

Subject : Criminal

Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, for quashing of FIR No.66/2007 dated 23.01.2007, under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh, west district, Delhi on the basis of settlement arrived at between … Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, for quashing of FIR No.66/2007 dated 23.01.2007, under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh, west district, Delhi on the basis of settlement arrived at between … between the parties and exercising its power under Section 482 of the Code while accepting the settlement and quashing the proceedings or refusing to accept

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial