Advanced Search Results
V.V.S. Rama Sharma and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-15-2009
CriminalInsurance
Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 27, 64, 69, 74 and 75; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 161, 165, 409 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 482 and 483; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 254 and 268
AIR2009SC3258; JT2009(6)SC19; 2009(5)SCALE517; (2009)7SCC234
said writ petitions the appellants herein challenged the FIR registered against them under Sections 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') and under Sections 64 and 69 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (in short `Stamp … may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.17. Section 64 of the Stamp Act provides for the penalty in case of omission to comply with the provisions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRangnath Sakharam Pawar Vs. Dnyandeo Baburao Kakade
Mumbai
Oct-14-1971
Criminal
(1972)74BOMLR449; 1972MhLJ673
except those under Sections 323, 352, 358, 379, 426, 447, 448, 461, 504, 506 and 510 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.With Clause (a) of the Notification again we are not here concerned because it relates to suits under Section … in question.3. The learned Magistrate overruled the preliminary objection. He relied upon the provisions of Section 63 and Section 64(2) and (3) of that Act and held that the plain reading of Section 64(3) of the Panchayats Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Delhi
May-18-2018
Criminal
No.3480/2015, have been summoned for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sectionsread with Section 32 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act-2003, hereinafter referred to as COTPA2003 and proceedings … an obligation upon the licence/occupier of the cinema hall”. CRL.M.C22082015, 2209/ 2015 & 3480/2015 Page 57 of 142 64. Inter alia on behalf of Ms. Gauri Rishi and the State it was contended by Sr. counsel Mr.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Salman Qureshi vs State (Gnct of Delhi)
Delhi
May-05-2026
Right to Information
190/2015, registered at Police Station Anand Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishabe under Sections 392/397/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC’), wherein the applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 397 of the IPC … DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 05, 2026/zp/gj* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 64/2026 DHARAM NATH MEHTO .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sameer Chatrath, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr. Arvind, Advocate.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .....Respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKantilal Damodardas Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Jul-02-1969
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 154, 156, 157 and 162; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 182; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 64
AIR1970Guj218; 1970CriLJ1359; (1970)0GLR868
- false information - Sections 154, 156, 157 and 162 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Section 182 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 64 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 - appeal against conviction under Section 182 - no complaint
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Sarvaraya Textiles Limited Rep. by Its Managing Director, S.B.P.S ...
Chennai
Mar-07-2001
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 133, 138, 141 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468 and 473; Kerala Police Act - Sections 64; First Schedule - Article 511; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860
[2001]107CompCas256(Mad)
of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 64 and Article 511 of First Schedule to Kerala Police Act and Indian Penal Code, 1860 - accused company entered into lease agreement with complainant company - default committed in payment of lease rentals
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShanti Lal Vs. State of M.P.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-08-2007
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 27, 27(2), 56, 57, 57(1), 58, 58(1), 59, 60, 65 and 65(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40, 41, 42, 63 to 70 and 304; Towns Nuisances Act (Madras), 1889 - Sections 3 and 3(10); Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923; Bihar Wakfs Act, 1947 - Sections 58; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 29, 30, 30(1) and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33
2007(2)BLJR2814; 2008CriLJ386; JT2007(12)SC1; 2008(1)KLT503(SC); 2008(1)MPHT1(SC)
18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 63 to 70 of the of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Accused-Appellant found to be in possession of … well as fine' in that Section must be understood in the same sense as those words bear in Section 64. The wording of Section 64, it must be admitted, is not happy, but I am of opinion that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParas Nath and ors. Vs. State
Allahabad
Jul-28-1967
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 386(1), 401 and 401(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 64, 68 and 69
AIR1969All116; 1969CriLJ350
the sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of the fine, are Sections 64, 68 and 69 of the Indian Penal Code. These Sections stand thus:--'64. In every case of an offence punishable with imprisonment as well as fine, in … - Sections 386(1) Proviso and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Sections 64, 68 and 69 of Penal Code, 1860 - sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of fine - punishment meant for failure to pay the … imprisonment? It can only be punishment for the default in payment of the fine which is permissible under Section 64 IPC. Let us take another case where an offence is punishable with imprisonment and fine both. If, for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAtikur Rahaman vs.union of India & Anr
Delhi
Mar-21-2017
Land Acquisition
for acts committed on foreign land. On the converse, Mr.Sanjay Jain has relied upon S. 3 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 with S. 188 of the Cr.P.C. to show that the detention order could have be passed.70. A coordinate … do, make an order directing that such person be detained” (Emphasis Supplied) 64. A bare reading of the provision would show that the detention order … hearing and disposal.2. Present petition has been instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCourt on Its Own Mtoion Vs. K.S. Sethi
Delhi
Nov-24-1967
CriminalContempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 4; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(38) and 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 64; Constitution of India - Article 215
1968CriLJ1417
- Section 63 to 70 of the Indian Penal Code (XLV of 1860) and the Provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the time … exhaust the power of this Court in the matter of the sentence, for this power is supplemented by section 64 of the Indian Penal Code read with sections 3(38) and 25 of the General Clauses Act. On the … him as well. (2) Our attention in this connection has been drawn to sections 63 to 70 of the Indian Penal Code and section 25 of the General Clauses Act. The latter section reads thus: '25. Recovery of Fines -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »