Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 58 · Page 1 of about 2,102 results (0.111 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 14 2012

Soman Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-14-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : (Kerala) Abkari Act - Sections 55(a)(i), 57A, 57A(2)(ii) 58; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 201

Section and Section 57B, the expression “grievous hurt” shall have the same meaning as in Section 320 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Central Act 45 of 1860).      (2) Whoever omits to take reasonable precautions to prevent the mixing of any noxious … and several persons were sustained injuries also.  His conviction for offences under Section 55(a) and (i) and under Section 58 are confirmed.  Even  though  he  was  only  a  small  retail seller, who got liquor from A 25, one

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1999

Dinesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-10-1999

Subject : Criminal

referred under Section 48, shall be deemed to be public servants within the meaning of Section 12 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).It is, therefore, submitted that the petitioner is a Government servant within the meaning of Section … complaint is illegal in view of the fact that O.P. No. 2 does not possess any power under Section 58 of Co-operative Society Act, 1935, to enquire a original matter. Hence, any inquiry by him is without jurisdiction.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2011

Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan, and ors. Vs. State of KeralA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 326, 328, 201, 299, 300, 304, 307 Read with Section 34 ; Kerala Abkari Act, 1955 - Sections 55(a)(g)(h)(i), 57A, 58, 8 ; Cochin Abkari Act ; Madras Abkari Act ;

section and section 57B the expression `grievous hurt' shall have the same meaning as in section 320 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Central Act 45 of 1860).(2) whoever omits to take reasonable precautions to prevent the mixing of any noxious … of the Indian Penal Code as also under Section 55 (a) (g) (h) and (i), Section 57A and Section 58 of Abkari Act. On the basis of this charge, evidence was led of about 270 witnesses. The accused

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 06 2023

Deranda Aiyappa @ Dalu Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-06-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused for the alleged offences. In this regard, it is required to refer to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which reads thus: “34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.-When a criminal act is … reliance facilitated by the learned Senior Counsel does not assist his case insofar as interference as sought for.-. 58 - NC:2023. KHC:23342-DB CRL.A No.665 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.641 of 2017 CRL.A No.833 of 2017 CRL.A No.943

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2023

Biddanda Kunjappa @ Jeevan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-06-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused for the alleged offences. In this regard, it is required to refer to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which reads thus: “34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.-When a criminal act is … reliance facilitated by the learned Senior Counsel does not assist his case insofar as interference as sought for.-. 58 - NC:2023. KHC:23342-DB CRL.A No.665 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.641 of 2017 CRL.A No.833 of 2017 CRL.A No.943

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2023

Sri Chottera A Erappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-06-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused for the alleged offences. In this regard, it is required to refer to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which reads thus: “34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.-When a criminal act is … reliance facilitated by the learned Senior Counsel does not assist his case insofar as interference as sought for.-. 58 - NC:2023. KHC:23342-DB CRL.A No.665 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.641 of 2017 CRL.A No.833 of 2017 CRL.A No.943

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2023

Biddanda Pemmaiah @ Prithvi Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-06-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused for the alleged offences. In this regard, it is required to refer to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which reads thus: “34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.-When a criminal act is … reliance facilitated by the learned Senior Counsel does not assist his case insofar as interference as sought for.-. 58 - NC:2023. KHC:23342-DB CRL.A No.665 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.641 of 2017 CRL.A No.833 of 2017 CRL.A No.943

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 1970

V.R. Bhate and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-1970

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Inland Steam Vessels Act, 1917 - Sections 58; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 282 and 304A;

Reported in : AIR1970SC1362; 1970CriLJ1261; (1970)3SCC13

- conviction - Section 58 of Inland Steam Vessels Act, 1917 and Sections 120-B, 282 and 304-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - captain and ticket collector responsible for overcrowding of launch and for carrying large number of passengers in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2018

Aseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2018

Subject : Criminal

No.3480/2015, have been summoned for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sectionsread with Section 32 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act-2003, hereinafter referred to as COTPA2003 and proceedings … that the guests/visitors were allowed to go only to the floors where CRL.M.C22082015, 2209/ 2015 & 3480/2015 Page 58 of 142 they were supposed to go and not loiter around. (violation of Regulation 8(iii)) 3. The licensee

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2007

Shanti Lal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-2007

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 27, 27(2), 56, 57, 57(1), 58, 58(1), 59, 60, 65 and 65(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40, 41, 42, 63 to 70 and 304; Towns Nuisances Act (Madras), 1889 - Sections 3 and 3(10); Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923; Bihar Wakfs Act, 1947 - Sections 58; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 29, 30, 30(1) and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 33

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2814; 2008CriLJ386; JT2007(12)SC1; 2008(1)KLT503(SC); 2008(1)MPHT1(SC)

18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 63 to 70 of the of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Accused-Appellant found to be in possession of … in Bashiruddin Ashraf v. State of Bihar . There a mutawalli was charged for violating the provision of Section 58 of the Bihar Wakfs Act, 1947 (Bihar Act VIII of 1948) for not discharging the obligation enjoined upon

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial