Advanced Search Results
Arjun Singh Vs. State of H.P.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-06-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 100, 107, 109, 120A, 120B, 363, 365, 366, 375, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D and 511
AIR2009SC1568; 2009CriLJ1332; JT2009(2)SC413; 2009(2)SCALE302; (2009)4SCC18; 2009(2)ShimLC83; 2009(2)LC651(SC); 2009AIRSCW1096; 2009(3)KCCRSN161
the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 376, 511, 363 and 366 as well as Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years, 3 years, 4 years,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSannaia Subba Rao and ors. Vs. State of A.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-24-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366A, 368, 372 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 222 and 378
2008(56)BLJR2583; RLW2008(3)SC2689; 2008(10)SCALE401; 2008AIRSCW6014; 2008(3)Crimes174; 2008(4)LH(SC)2955
the High Court - Legality of - Appellate Powers - Discussion - Sections 363, 366A, 372, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the Act) - Family of the prosecutrix, a minor, filed a missing report casting doubts on the Appellants … Pradesh at Hyderabad, convicting the three appellants under the provisions of Section 366A and Section 372 read with Section 511 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short `IPC') and requiring each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKapoor Chand Maganlal Chanderia Vs. Delhi State (Administration)
Supreme Court of India
Apr-16-1985
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 207-A(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 403, 420, 438, 467, 471 and 511
1985(1)Crimes987(SC); 1985(1)SCALE1003; 1985Supp(1)SCC268; [1985]3SCR773; 1985(17)LC816(SC)
facie make out a case for framing of a charge under Section 420 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, we do feel that no useful purpose would be served by subjecting the appellant to another prosecution punishable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M. Balakrishna Reddy Vs. Director, Cbi, New Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Mar-14-2008
Criminal
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6(1); Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 7, 9 and 11(1); Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 417, 418, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 482; Business Rule - Rules 12, 13 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 77, 77(2), 166, 166(1), 166(2) and 166(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197
AIR2008SC1754; 2008(56)BLJR1575; JT2008(4)SC162; 2008(4)SCALE617; (2008)4SCC409
appellant for offences punishable under Sections 420, 471, 474, 467, 468 and 417 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short). A charge-sheet was filed in the Court of Special Magistrate, Central Bureau of Investigation ('CBI'
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMd. Kalam Vs. the State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Jun-13-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376, 376(2) and 511
2008(2)ALD(Cri)432; 2008(3)ALT(Cri)52; 2008CriLJ3194; (2008)7SCC257
he had questioned the correctness of conviction for offence punishable under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulation,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKoppula Venkat Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Mar-10-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 122, 375, 376, 399 and 511
AIR2004SC1874; 2004CriLJ1804; JT2004(3)SC328; 2004(3)SCALE96; (2004)3SCC602
Trial Court and upheld by Learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC'). He was sentenced to undergo 10 years RI by the Trial Court which was … prosecutrix alone can form the foundation of conviction.8. The plea relating to applicability of Section 376 read with Section 511, IPC needs careful consideration. In every crime, there is first, intention to commit, secondly, preparation to commit it,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askincome-tax Officer Vs. Dharamchand Surana
Chennai
Mar-10-1995
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 273(A) and (C), 276C and 276C(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420 and 511
[1995]216ITR678(Mad)
in E.O.C.C. No. 705 of 1983 for the offences under sections 193 and 420 read with section 511, Indian Penal Code, 1860, and section 276C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The respondent was carrying on business in jewellery and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Madan Singh
Supreme Court of India
Feb-01-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376, 376(1), 376(2) and 511
AIR2008SC1292; 2008CriLJ1939; JT2008(2)SC158; 2008(2)SCALE211; (2008)5SCC147
learned Single Judge by the impugned judgment while upholding the conviction for offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), reduced the sentence from 10 years to 7 years. 2. The respondent allegedly committed … to the question of sentence was that the offence at best was one under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC. It was submitted that the accused had suffered custody of about 6 years and, therefore, he being
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of H.P. Vs. M.P. Gupta
Supreme Court of India
Dec-09-2003
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 193, 196, 197, 197(1) and 197(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2)(1), 6 and 6(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898
2004(1)ALD(Cri)283; 2004(1)BLJR429; JT2003(10)SC32; 2003(10)SCALE522; (2004)2SCC349
one was for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 120-B, Section 420 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'), Section 5(2) (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short the 'Old
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkripal S/O Shyamlal Charmakar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Mar-19-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 122, 354, 375, 376, 399 and 511
2007CriLJ2302; JT2007(4)SC393; 2007(I)OLR(SC)803; 2007(4)SCALE438; 2007AIRSCW2198; (2007)3Crimes115(SC)
the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Satna. Appellant was found guilty of offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years.3. Prosecution version as unfolded during … PW-8 to contend that at the most the offence can be in terms of Section 354 IPC or Section 511 IPC.Per contra, learned Counsel for the respondent-State submitted that the Trial Court and the High Court have analysed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »