Advanced Search Results

Emperor Vs. Suleman Shamji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1943)45BOMLR895

application in revision against the conviction of the accused by the Chief Presidency Magistrate under Section 272 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The conviction, in my opinion, proceeds on two serious errors. Section 272 provides that whoever adulterates any article … in order to prove that the contents of the report were true. The case does not fall within Section 510 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, which provides that any document purporting to be a report under the

Mangaldas Raghavji Ruparel and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Criminal Law; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 182, 510 and 537; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272 and 276; The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 4(1), 7, 10, 10(3), 11, 13(1), 13(5), 16(1), 17(1) and 19(1); Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 12, 13, 24, 65, 66 and 83(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 8(1), 23(1), 23(1-A) and 24(1); Madras Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1918

Reported in : AIR1966SC128; 1966CriLJ106; [1965]2SCR894

of the facts stated therein in any proceeding under this Act or under sections 272 to 276 of the Indian Penal Code : Provided that any document purporting to be a certificate signed by the Director of the Central Food … sustain the conviction and indeed it could not well have said so in view of the provisions of section 510, Cr.P.C. What the High Court seems to have felt was that in circumstances like those present in the

Himachal Pradesh Administration Vs. Mt. Shiv Devi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164, 173(4), 367, 417, 423 and 510(2); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 5, 8, 24 and 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302

Reported in : AIR1959HP3,1959CriLJ448

Sessions Judge for the disposal of case property will, however, stand. Criminal - murder - Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - respondent charged under Section 302 for allegedly causing death of X by administering him deadly poison - … Jai Singh started vomiting soon after finishing his dinner. The learned Advocate for the appellant pointed out that Section 510, Cr. P. C., has now been amended. Under Sub-section (2) thereof, it was open to the Sessions Judge

Mohd. Salim vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Indian Penal Code, 1860 in which both the appellants were convicted for the offences punishable under Section 4of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392/3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and were sentenced

Girish @ Giriraju Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

reliance on the following citations:1. (2015) 3 SCC724- Sher Singh alias Partapa //Vs// State of Haryana “ A. Penal Code, 1860 - S.304-B - Dowry death - Burden of proof - words “shown” and “deemed” - Interpretation of, in … Act of 1961 and so also for offences under Section 498 A read with Section 34 of the IPC. Apart from the same, Accused No.1 was also convicted for offences under Section 304(B) of IPC, 1860 and

State of Orissa Vs. Kaushalya Dei

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 367, 162, 164, 423, 510 and 510(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1), 114, 137 and 138

Reported in : AIR1965Ori38; 1965CriLJ321

the result, we set aside the order of acquittal and convict the respondent Kaushalya Dei under Section 302, Indian Penal Code, and sentence her to imprisonment for life. The extreme penalty of death is not called for in this … that alcohol as well as oleander were detected in the viscera of the deceased. Mr. Ray relied on Section 510, Cr. P. C. and contended that Ex. 4 was not admissible. In evidence as it was not duly

Baldeo Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 60, 62, 68, 69, 70 and 73; Constitution of India - Article 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 140, 143, 145, 147, 151, 153, 160, 172, 174, 178, 179, 269, 277, 279, 283, 285, 286, 289, 290, 294, 323, 334, 336, 341, 352, 356, 357, 358, 374, 379, 380, 381, 403, 411, 426, 428, 430, 447, 448, 461, 504, 506 and 510; Criminial Procedure Code, 1898 - Sections 109 and 110

Reported in : AIR1957SC612; 1957CriLJ998; [1957]1SCR995

commit any such offence, if committed within the local limits of its jurisdiction, namely : (a) offences under the Indian Penal Code, sections 140, 143, 145, 147, 151, 153, 160, 172, 174, 178, 179, 269, 277, 279, 283, 285, 286, … 380, 381, 403, 411, 426, 428, 430, 447, 448, 461, 504, 506, 510; (b) offences under the Bengal Public Gambling Act, 1867; (c) offences under … first those provisions of the Act which, according to learned counsel for the appellants, are discriminatory in character. Section 62 of the Act, which provides for the criminal jurisdiction of Gram Cutcherries, is in these terms :

K.U.Prabhu Raj Vs. State by Sub Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Sections 415, 417, 420, 376; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 482

in C.C.No.937 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tambaram, is quashed. [S.NAGAMUTHU, J.] Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Sections 415, 417, 420, 376 -- The second respondent is the defacto complainant in this … a judgment of this Court in Gopu Seshasayee v. State (1977 TNLJ 510) wherein, this Court has held as follows:-.....Mere deception is not a criminal … Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.937 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial

Kishan Singh Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1928)30BOMLR1572

the death of Kuber Singh and Shoran Singh and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, and within the cognizanoe of the Court of Session.And I hereby direct that you be tried by the … Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 436, 439-High Court-Revisional jurisdiction-Alteration of conviction-Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 304.;Where an accused is tried for an offence of murder but is convicted of culpable homicide … Bombay, in the case of Emperor v. Shivputraya I.L.R (1924) 48 Bom. 510: 26 Bom. L.R. 438 dealing with the provisions of Section 439(4), arrived

Madan Lal Arora Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 7 and 10; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 190, 225, 232, 237, 342, 362(2A), 364(1), 510 and 537; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 482 and 485; ;Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 12 and 44(2)

Reported in : AIR1961Cal240,1961CriLJ488

in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. He has also been convicted under Section 482/485 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months'.2. … the case in order to clarify the nature and extent of the adulteration of the samples in question. Section 510 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that a document purporting to be a report of the Chemical