Advanced Search Results

Biji vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 406, 415, 418, 420, 468 and 508 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. There were four accused. They appeared before the Magistrate on receipt of summons and in their presence, the

Sunilkumar, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 406, 415, 418, 420, 468 and 508 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. There were four accused. They appeared before the Magistrate on receipt of summons and in their presence, the

Rabiyul Mondal Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(4), 198, 198(1), 199, 238, 397, 401 and 482;; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 376, 493, 494 and 499 to 508

Reported in : (1999)3CALLT19(HC)

offences against marriage : (1) No Court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under chapter XX of the Indian Penal Code. 1860 ( 45 of 1860) except upon a complaint made by some person aggrieved by the offence : Provided … J. 1. This revisional application is for quashing of a proceeding being G.R. No. 164 of 1997 under sections 376/109/493 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Basirhat. 2. On … under chapter XXI of the Penal Code (that is, sections 499 to 508) except upon a complaint made by some persons aggrieved of such offence.

The State Of Gujarat Vs. Narayan @ Narayan Sai @ Mota Bhagwan Asaram @ ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Sections 376(2)(c), 377, 354, 344, 357, 342, 323, 504, 506(2), 120-B, 212, 153 and 114 of 1 1 the Indian Penal Code 1860 . Charges were framed. On the conclusion of the trial, the Sessions Court by a judgment dated 30 … rigorous imprisonment together with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default, simple imprisonment of one month; (vi) Section 508: one year’s rigorous imprisonment together with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default, simple imprisonment of one

Sri Raj Raj Deb Vs. Sri Gangadhar Mohapatra and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 100, 123, 123(2) and 123(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 171C, 171F and 508

Reported in : AIR1964Ori1; 1964CriLJ57

two following categories : (i) those which amount to offences under Section 171F read with Section 171C of the Indian Penal Code and Section 508 of the Indian Penal Code and (ii) those which do not amount to any offence

State of Nct of Delhi vs.bhanwar Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Courts, New Delhi in FIR no.whereby the respondent was acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short „IPC‟).2. Facts leading to the filing of the present Leave to Appeal are that on 22.01.2015 … $~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 10.2017 CRL.L.P. 508/2017 Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) 1. This Leave to Appeal has been

V.P Thankachan, vs Aliamma Babu,

Court : Kerala

establish the offences allegedly committed by the accused under Sections 465, 468 and 471 read with Section34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’). All together seven accused were involved in the case and the prosecution against the 4th … dismissing the complaint was that the complainant failed to establish the offences allegedly committed by the accused under Sections 465, 468 and 471 read with Section34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’). All together … VEEDU, AVANEESWARAM (R.S. P.O.), NEDUVANNOOR MURI, PIDAVOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN 691 508. 2 VALSAMMA NAINAN, AGED 53, W/O.NAINAN, KALLARANILKKUNNATHIN VEETTIL, PUNNALA P.O., CHACHIPUNNA, PUNNALA

Vishwanath Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 97, 99, 100, 100(5), 299, 304, 352, 362, 364, 365, 366, 367, 369 and 377

Reported in : AIR1960SC67; (1960)62PLR530; [1960]1SCR646

private defence - Sections 97, 99, 100, 100 (5), 299, 304, 352, 362, 364, 365, 366, 367 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant's sister forcefully taken away by her husband from his father's house - appellant's sister not willing … v. Emperor : AIR1930Pat347 , Sakha v. The State I.L.R. 1950 Nag. 508, and Dayaram Laxman v. State A.I.R. 1953 Mad Bha 182. There is, … which occasions the exercise of the right is of one of the kinds mentioned in s. 100. 5. Section 97 gives the right of private defence of person against any offence affecting the human body. Section 99

Suresh vs State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

which the appellants were convicted for offences punishable under Section 148 and Sections 302, 307 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’).2. The appellants further challenge the Order dated 05.05.2003passed by the learned Trial Court, whereby they were sentenced … DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 20.04.2026Pronounced on: 14.05.2026+ CRL.A. 341/2003 + CRL.A. 347/2003 + CRL.A. 396/2003 + CRL.A. 508/2003NASIR AHMAD .....Appellant Through: Ms.Divya Pulani, Mr.Vishal Choudhary, Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Mr.Rajvardhan Singh and Mr.Lakshay Magan, Advs.JAGJIT SINGH .....Appellant Through:

V.O. Mathew vs Aliesha, Formerly Laila,

Court : Kerala

1 st petitioner against respondent as CC No.1756/2014 alleging commission of an offence punishable under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘the IPC’) was dismissed as per judgment dated 11.11.2019 after trial, that the application seeking DNA … HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1945 OP(CRL.) NO. 508 OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07.05.2021 IN M.P.No.254A/2020 IN MC NO.100/2020 OF FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN M.C.