Advanced Search Results

Brijendra and anr Vs State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 50 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 186,353,332,34

to be weighing 300 Grams. It is alleged that this powder is smack. FIR No.802/2007 under Sections 186/353/332/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short) and Sections 21/61/85 NDPS Act, police station Nand Nagri was registered.3. It is the prosecution … as Om Prakash and Bijender. As it was suspected that they were carrying narcotics, a written notice under Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act for short) was served on Om Prakash.

Badshah vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

commission of the CRL.A.NO.369/2015 Page 1 of 39 offences punishable under Sections 120B r/w 396 & 460/396/412 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. Vide the impugned order on sentence dated 10.09.2014, … being drawn against him during trial, stated to the effect that “25 to 30 people have taken about 50-60 photographs of mine at the police station and a number of people had appeared and seen my face

State of Rajasthan Vs. Babu Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 17, 18, 41, 42, 43, 50 and 50(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 11; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(42); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2

Reported in : 105(2008)CLT265(SC); JT2007(8)SC510; 2007(6)MhLj465; 2007MPLJ432(SC); RLW2007(4)SC2887; 2007(8)SCALE382; (2007)6SCC55

2(y) of the Code says that the words and expressions used therein and not defined but defined in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Code. Section 11 of the Indian Penal Code says … stipulation. 2. The High Court directed acquittal on the ground that there was non-compliance of mandatory requirement of Section 50 of the Act. Before the High Court though many points were urged, the primary stand was non-compliance of

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorists Activities Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4, 6, 20 and 32 and 50; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 15 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 196, 218, 366, 367 and 368; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 65B(2), 138 and 146; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120, 120B, 121, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

the Commissioner of Police--Sanction accorded under Section 7 of the Explosive Substances Act meets the requirement of law. ;Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 120, 120B, 302, 307--Sentence--Conviction--Conviction of accused Mohd. Afzal and accused Shaukat Hussain Guru in respect of … for prosecution granted by Lt. Governor being the administrator, is a valid one--Prevention of Terrorists Activities Act, 2002, Section 50, 2(h)--Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 196 ;Right of accused to be represented by counsel--Role of counsel--Every accused has

The State Of Karnataka Vs. Chandrashekar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

following cases: i) DHANNA, ETC. vs. STATE OF M.P. (AIR1996SC2478 wherein the Apex Court has held thus: “(C) Penal Code (45 of 1860), S.300 - Murder - Proof - Prosecution witness did not refer to any role played … by the learned counsel for the appellants.20. Lastly, the learned counsel has taken us through the principles of the Indian Evidence Act by referring to Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act. There is no evidence on record … by husband/bridegroom and his relatives. Section 498-A of IPC it indicates explanation 50 (a) and (b). In explanation for the purpose of this Section “cruelty”

The State Of Karnataka Vs. Sri Chandrashekar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

following cases: i) DHANNA, ETC. vs. STATE OF M.P. (AIR1996SC2478 wherein the Apex Court has held thus: “(C) Penal Code (45 of 1860), S.300 - Murder - Proof - Prosecution witness did not refer to any role played … by the learned counsel for the appellants.20. Lastly, the learned counsel has taken us through the principles of the Indian Evidence Act by referring to Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act. There is no evidence on record … by husband/bridegroom and his relatives. Section 498-A of IPC it indicates explanation 50 (a) and (b). In explanation for the purpose of this Section “cruelty”

M Chandrashekar Vs. State By Devanahalli Police Station

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

following cases: i) DHANNA, ETC. vs. STATE OF M.P. (AIR1996SC2478 wherein the Apex Court has held thus: “(C) Penal Code (45 of 1860), S.300 - Murder - Proof - Prosecution witness did not refer to any role played … by the learned counsel for the appellants.20. Lastly, the learned counsel has taken us through the principles of the Indian Evidence Act by referring to Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act. There is no evidence on record … by husband/bridegroom and his relatives. Section 498-A of IPC it indicates explanation 50 (a) and (b). In explanation for the purpose of this Section “cruelty”

N.L. Manchanda Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (IPC) - Section 120-B; Prevention of Corruption Act (P.C Act) - Section 5(1)(d) r/w 5(2)

setting aside Order dated 13th November, 2007 directing framing of charges against the petitioners under Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC, for short) r/w Section 5(1)(d) and 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, … These two criminal revision petitions have been filed by Mr. N. L. Manchanda and Mr. Ashok Shetty for setting aside Order dated 13th November, 2007 directing framing of charges against

Vadde Rama Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-B, 494, 495, 497 and 498; Indian Divorce Act, 1869; Evidence Act - Sections 50; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1666

is dismissed. (21) Order accordingly. Criminal - dowry death - Sections 304-B, 494, 495, 497 and 498 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Divorce Act, 1869, Section 50 of Indian Evidence Act and Section 161 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973

The Intelligence Officer and ors. Vs. Arshad Saleem Khan and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psyscotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sectons 42, 41(2), 50, 53, 53A, 53(3), 66 and 67; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 174 and 175

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4496; ILR2004KAR3855

this summons without law-full excuses, you will be liable to be punished under Section 174 and 175 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.Given under my hand and seal of office today the 8th day of November 1996.Sd/ - R. Kiran GaikwadI/O … the doubts about tampering.22. The counsel for the accused argued that there is non-compliance of mandatory provisions of Section 50 that the accused were not informed of their right to be searched in presence of a gazetted officer.