Advanced Search Results

The State Of Karnataka Vs. Chandrashekar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

following cases: i) DHANNA, ETC. vs. STATE OF M.P. (AIR1996SC2478 wherein the Apex Court has held thus: “(C) Penal Code (45 of 1860), S.300 - Murder - Proof - Prosecution witness did not refer to any role played … under Section 235(2) Cr.P.C. by way of alternative of punishment instead of offences charged against the accused under Section 498A, 304B of the IPC, 1860 and so also for offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the DP … by the learned counsel for the appellants.20. Lastly, the learned counsel has taken us through the principles of the Indian Evidence Act by referring to Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act. There is no evidence on record

The State Of Karnataka Vs. Sri Chandrashekar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

following cases: i) DHANNA, ETC. vs. STATE OF M.P. (AIR1996SC2478 wherein the Apex Court has held thus: “(C) Penal Code (45 of 1860), S.300 - Murder - Proof - Prosecution witness did not refer to any role played … under Section 235(2) Cr.P.C. by way of alternative of punishment instead of offences charged against the accused under Section 498A, 304B of the IPC, 1860 and so also for offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the DP … by the learned counsel for the appellants.20. Lastly, the learned counsel has taken us through the principles of the Indian Evidence Act by referring to Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act. There is no evidence on record

M Chandrashekar Vs. State By Devanahalli Police Station

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

following cases: i) DHANNA, ETC. vs. STATE OF M.P. (AIR1996SC2478 wherein the Apex Court has held thus: “(C) Penal Code (45 of 1860), S.300 - Murder - Proof - Prosecution witness did not refer to any role played … under Section 235(2) Cr.P.C. by way of alternative of punishment instead of offences charged against the accused under Section 498A, 304B of the IPC, 1860 and so also for offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the DP … by the learned counsel for the appellants.20. Lastly, the learned counsel has taken us through the principles of the Indian Evidence Act by referring to Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act. There is no evidence on record

Prem Kanwar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304, 304B, 306 and 498A

Reported in : AIR2009SC1242; 2009(57)BLJR777; 2009CriLJ1123; JT2009(1)SC197; RLW2009(2)SC1714; 2009(1)SCALE230; (2009)3SCC726; 2009(1)LC299(SC); 2009AIRSCW536; 2009(1)LHSC378

and two others faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 306 and 304 Part-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (in short `Dowry Prohibition Act').2. … her husband; andiv) Such cruelty or harassment must be in connection with the demand of dowry.Sections 304B and Section 498A read as follows:304-B. Dowry Death- (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Raj Gopal Asawa and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR2004SC1933; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)642; 2004CriLJ1791; I(2004)DMC586SC; JT2004(3)SC560; 2004(3)SCALE339; (2004)4SCC470

for which the Trial Court had convicted them i.e. offences punishable under Section 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (for short 'the IPC'). Three persons faced trial relating to the alleged suicidal death of one Mangala (hereinafter

Baldev Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : AIR2009SC913; JT2008(8)SC690; 2008(11)SCALE120; 2008AIRSCW8241; 2008(4)LH(SC)2929

Amritsar, had convicted both, the present appellant and Surjit Kaur for the offence punishable under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and had sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to … the effect that the demand of dowry was made just before the deceased committed suicide.8. Sections 304B and Section 498A read as follows:304-B. Dowry Death- (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or

Shivanand Mallappa Koti Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4 and 6; Criminal Law (Second Amendment), 1983

Reported in : AIR2007SC2314; II(2007)DMC166SC; JT2007(8)SC462; 2007(5)KarLJ299; RLW2007(4)SC3178; 2007(8)SCALE408; 2007AIRSCW4012; (2007)3Crimes91(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)2052; ILR2007(3)Kar3293; 2007(3)KCCRSN180; 2007(4)AIRKarR609(SC).

Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court holding the appellant guilty of offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The appellant faced trial along with two others, i.e. his mother and brother for

Kaliyaperumal and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304B, 306 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR2003SC3828; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)682; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)337; 2003(51)BLJR1851; 2003CriLJ4321; JT2003(7)SC392; 2003(6)SCALE707; (2004)9SCC157; 2004(1)LC3(SC)

J. 1. The appellants who were found guilty of offences punishable under Section 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam, unsuccessfully challenged the conviction before the Madras High Court.

Raman Kumar Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3034; JT2009(8)SC422; 2009(6)SCALE335; 2009AIRSCW3598; 2009(4)LHSC2266

two co-accused persons who faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC')3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:Suman Bal (hereinafter referred to as the … acquittal of the appellant and two co-accused persons who faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC')3. Background facts in a nutshell

Kishangiri Mangalgiri Goswami Vs. State of Gujarat Overruled

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act - Section 3, Dowry Prohibition Act - Section 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 157, Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 209, Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 313, Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 374(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 306, Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 498A

Reported in : 2009GLH(2)9

3 years and fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default simple imprisonment for 6 months, under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860; rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs. 20,000/-, in default, further simple imprisonment of 1 year,