Advanced Search Results

Yusuf Qureshi Vs. M.A. Rafat and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 488

Reported in : 1996(2)ALD(Cri)444; 1996(3)ALT514; 1996CriLJ3681

jointly and severally. Advocate's fees Rs. 2,000/-. 16. Order accordingly Criminal - disobeying Orders - Section 488 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - contempt case filed alleging that respondent wilfully disobeyed judgment of Division Bench and caused harassment and illegal

Abdul Sattar Mohmed HusseIn Vs. Badrinarayan Bansilal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 21 and 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 480, 482, 483, 485, 486 and 488; Merchandise Marks Act, 1889 - Sections 6 and 7

Reported in : AIR1962Bom29; (1961)63BOMLR563; 1961CriLJ871; ILR1961Bom841

may come to the conclusion that the use of the marks is calculated to deceive.;The relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, do not require that the user of the mark must actually defraud anyone; the use must be reasonably … accused were charge-sheeted for offences under Secs. 482, 483, 485, and 488 of the Penal Code and under Section 6 and 7 of the Indian Merchandise Marks Act read with Section 34 of the Penal Code.(5) Accused

Sk. Bale S/O Fateh Mohammad Vs. HafizoddIn S/O Dadubhai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 223, 323, 395, 488, 494 and 506(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 202, 204 and 245(1); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR545

admission stands rejected. Criminal - compliant - Sections 34, 223, 323, 395, 488, 494 and 506 (2) of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 202, 204 and 245 (1) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Article 227 of Constitution of … of Fateh Mohammad filed a complaint against 16 persons on the allegations that they have committed offences under sections 395, 488, 494, 506(2), 323 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In this complaint process

Moideenkutty Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 122(7), 125, 125(3), 128, 250(3), 345(1), 358(2), 358(3), 359, 446 and 488; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53 and 67; General Clauses Act - Sections 3 and 3(27); Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3402; 2008(2)KLJ741

of either description as defined in the Indian Penal Code; (45 of 1860).12. The definition of the expression imprisonment as such is not available in … such liability to undergo imprisonment cannot be held to be a punishment as contemplated under Section 53 of the Indian Penal Code.8. The decision of the Supreme Court in Kuldip Kaur v. Surinder Singh : 1989CriLJ794 makes the position crystal … which has some bearing and impact on the question.We would remark further that the warrant of imprisonment under Section 488, Criminal P.C., the form of which is to be found in Schedule 5, No. XL, contemplates a sentence

Bajirao Raghoba Tambre Vs. Tolanbai (Miss) D/O Bhagwan Toge and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 11, 17, 25 and 25(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488; Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 20(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 495 and 496; Hindu Law;

Reported in : 1980CriLJ473

Code, 1898, Section 20 (3) of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act of 1956, Sections 495 and 496 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Hindu Law - second wife claimed maintenance - second marriage solemnized during subsistence of first marriage - … him, the word 'wife' in section 125 must mean, and has all along been construed to mean under section 488 of the old Code of Criminal Procedure, 'a legally wedded wife', and as such a woman whose marriage

Maya Devi and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the basis of the said complaint, FIR No.466 of 1966 was registered under Sections 498A, 304B, 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘the IPC’). After investigation, charges under Sections 498A and 304B read with Section 34 of the

A.G. Pol and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197 and 488

Reported in : 1986(1)BomCR613

the second respondent against the petitioner is dismissed. Rule made absolute. Criminal - defamation - Section 500 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 197 and 488 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - petitioners filed petition for quashing process issued

Safi Rehman & Ors. vs State of Nct, Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

quashing of FIR No. 488/2022 dated 15.10.2022, registered at Police Station Budh Vihar, Delhi, under Sections 354/354(B)/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned … Deepak, PS-Budh Vihar. R-2 in person.CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.04.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [“BNSS”] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

Nani Gopal Biswas Vs. the Municipality of Howrah

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 236 and 237; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 299, 300 and 488(1); Constitution of India - Article 134(1)

Reported in : AIR1958SC141; 1958CriLJ271; [1958]33ITR1(SC); (1958)36MysLJ(SC)337; [1958]1SCR774

appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. 11. Appeal dismissed. Criminal - additional evidence - Sections 201 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 236 and 237 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 299, 300 and 488 (1) of Calcutta Municipal … the conviction could not possibly by correct in law......... It would therefore be arguable that a notice under section 299 to remove a compound wall unattached to any building could not be a notice 'lawfully given' or

N. Gowthaman @ Babu Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by i ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Nadu Borstal Schools Act, 1925 - Section 10-A, Section 53 - Prisons Act, 1986 - Section 3(1) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 8, Section 302 read with Section 34 Tamil Nadu Borstal Schools Rules, 1938 - Rule 5 … delinquent juvenile in the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986. In Arnit Das vs. State of Bihar [(2000) 5 SCC 488], a 2 Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that the crucial date to determine whether an accused