Advanced Search Results

Shantilal Uttamram Mehta Vs. Dhanji Kanji Shah and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 486; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 342 and 417 (3); Merchandise Marks Act, 1887 - Sections 2(2); Criminal Law

Reported in : AIR1961Bom203; (1961)63BOMLR69; 1961CriLJ66; ILR1961Bom248

Section 486 -- 'Reasonable precautions' under Section 486 (a), what are.;The offence of counterfeiting under Section 486 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, will be complete as soon as the various acts mentioned in the section as forming ingredients of the

The Registrar of Trade Marks Vs. Ashok Chandra Rakhit Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 13; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 486

Reported in : AIR1955SC558; [1955]2SCR252

disclaimer in trade mark - Sections 2 and 13 of Trade Marks Act, 1940 and Section 486 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal against Order of High Court - decision of Registrar to insert disclaimer of word 'Shree' reversed

Kundan Lal Agarwal and anr. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 480, 482 and 486

Reported in : AIR1958All643; 1958CriLJ1102

I. P. C. The fines if paid shall be refunded. Criminal - colourable imitation - Section 480 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - mere stocking of goods in wrapper bearing colourable imitation of genuine marks - not amounts to using … contention that the case of the accused came under any of the Clauses (a), (b) and (c) of Section 486, I. P. C.3. This revision first came up for hearing before a learned single Judge of this Court

State of Bombay Vs. Geoffrey Manners and Co. (No. 1) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Merchandise Marks Act, 1889 - Sections 2, 2(3), 6 and 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 482, 486 and 487

Reported in : AIR1951Bom45; (1951)53BOMLR112; ILR1951Bom518

Sections 6 and 7 of the Indian Merchandise Marks Act, 1889, and Sections 482, 486 and 487 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 :-; That there was a false trade description applied to the product and enclosures sold with the product, … is guilty of an off nce Unless he pr ves that he acted without intent to defraud. Under Section 486, whoever has in possession for sale any goods with a counterfeit trade mark impressed upon the same, is

Abdul Sattar Mohmed HusseIn Vs. Badrinarayan Bansilal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 21 and 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 480, 482, 483, 485, 486 and 488; Merchandise Marks Act, 1889 - Sections 6 and 7

Reported in : AIR1962Bom29; (1961)63BOMLR563; 1961CriLJ871; ILR1961Bom841

may come to the conclusion that the use of the marks is calculated to deceive.;The relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, do not require that the user of the mark must actually defraud anyone; the use must be reasonably … fine of Rs. 2500/- for the offences under Secs. 482, 483, 485, 486, 488 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is … accused were charge-sheeted for offences under Secs. 482, 483, 485, and 488 of the Penal Code and under Section 6 and 7 of the Indian Merchandise Marks Act read with Section 34 of the Penal Code.(5) Accused

The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Hafiz Mohammad Ismail and

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 28, 482 and 486

Reported in : AIR1960SC669; 1960CriLJ1017; (1961)63PLR359; [1960]2SCR911

on the lines indicated above. 9. Cases remanded. Criminal - counterfeit - Sections 28, 482 and 486 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal against Order of High Court acquitting respondents from charge of counterfeiting products of appellant company under … - held, case sent back to High Court on grounds indicated above to decide charge made out under Section 486. - Section 8: [S.B. Sinha & Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ] Legal heir - Deceased lady married with one

Haveli Ram Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 480, 482 and 486

Reported in : AIR1956All132; 1956CriLJ183

not surrender to his bail. Criminal - counterfeiting & colourable imitation - Sections 480, 482 and 486 of Indian Penal Code,1860 - the test is to examine the totality of the impression, likely to be left by the … (that offences under Section 482 and 483, I. P. C. were not made out, but the offence under Section 486, I. P. O. was establishedThe learned Magistrate accordingly convicted the applicant under Section 486, I. P. C. and

Noor Mahomed Haji Usman and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 478, 482, 483 and 486; Trade Marks Act, 1940

Reported in : AIR1956Bom700; 1956CriLJ1302

shouldbe refunded to the accused.12. Appeal allowed. Criminal - colourable imitation - Sections 482, 483 and 486 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Trade Marks Act, 1940 - appeal filed against conviction of appellants charged for committing colourable imitation of … is on Ex. A, and having come to that conclusion, he convicted accused 1 of the offence under Section 486 and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten

Sony Kabushiki Kaisha Vs. Mahaluxmi Textile Mills

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; ;Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Section 10(2); ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Section 27; ;Trade Marks Act 1999 - Section 29(4); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 482 and 486

Reported in : LC2009(2)125,2009(41)PTC184(Cal)

as to whether a complaint for criminal action under Sections 482 and 486 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ought to be sustained or not. … Jain (1973) 1 SCC 56 is an authority on distinction between the trade mark and property mark (under the Indian Penal Code 1860). The question which was examined by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in this case was as to whether a … a class of goods for which the trade mark is not registered by its proprietor. On this issue, Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act 1999 has been referred to by her. The said provision stipulates:29. Infringement

Jolly vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

th Additional Sessions Judge, Ernakulam, on a charge for the offences punishable under Sections 302 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The trial court found the 1 st accused guilty of the offence punishable under Section 304 Part ll … NO.1461 OF 2006. SHEEBA THOMAS..GP THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.05.2024, ALONG WITH CRL.A.579/2012, 486/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE