Advanced Search Results

Anand Reddi Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195, 195(1), 485, 485A, 486 and 487; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 174; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; ;Constitution of India - Article 254

Reported in : AIR1959AP144; 1959CriLJ300

dismissed. Criminal - repugnancy - Sections 195, 485-A and 487 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Section 175 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Article 254 of Constitution of India - whether there was conflict between Sections 485-A and 487 of

Abdul Sattar Mohmed HusseIn Vs. Badrinarayan Bansilal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 21 and 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 480, 482, 483, 485, 486 and 488; Merchandise Marks Act, 1889 - Sections 6 and 7

Reported in : AIR1962Bom29; (1961)63BOMLR563; 1961CriLJ871; ILR1961Bom841

may come to the conclusion that the use of the marks is calculated to deceive.;The relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, do not require that the user of the mark must actually defraud anyone; the use must be reasonably … accused were charge-sheeted for offences under Secs. 482, 483, 485, and 488 of the Penal Code and under Section 6 and 7 of the Indian Merchandise Marks Act read with Section 34 of the Penal Code.(5) Accused

Sandeep Pathak & Ors. vs Lalita Tiwari

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

252/2013 dated 25.06.2013, P.S. KNSigned By:VIKAS CRL.M.C. 297 & 485/2021 Page 2 of 20Katju Marg under Section 498A/406/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) and the proceedings arising therefrom.2. The brief background is that the Petitioner No.1,

Sandeep Pathak & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

252/2013 dated 25.06.2013, P.S. KNSigned By:VIKAS CRL.M.C. 297 & 485/2021 Page 2 of 20Katju Marg under Section 498A/406/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) and the proceedings arising therefrom.2. The brief background is that the Petitioner No.1,

Chintamanrao Balajirao Vs. Digram Badluram

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 235(1), 403, 439 and 439(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 485

Reported in : AIR1960MP149; 1960CriLJ609

others, namely, Girilal, Kishorilal and Ramgopal for alleged offences under Sections 120B, 420, 483, 485 and 486 of the Indian Penal Code. At the initial stage of the trial, the Trial Magistrate discharged the accused Digram under Section 251-A(2) of

Esskey Machinery (P) Ltd. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Court : Orissa

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14B

Reported in : (1999)ILLJ1001Ori

damages are computed. Section 11 of the Act deals with penalties. Further under Section 485 Explanation I of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, if a person being an employer deducts the employee's contribution from the wages payable to the employee for

Madan Lal Arora Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 7 and 10; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 190, 225, 232, 237, 342, 362(2A), 364(1), 510 and 537; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 482 and 485; ;Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 12 and 44(2)

Reported in : AIR1961Cal240,1961CriLJ488

in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. He has also been convicted under Section 482/485 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months'.2.

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. Prafulla Kumar

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 28 and 485

Reported in : AIR1954Cal277

J.1. This is an appeal by the State against the respondent's acquittal of an offence under Section 485, Penal Code.2. The prosecution case against the respondent is as follows: Messrs. Gabail Ltd. of London are manufacturers of a … mark upon them was for the purpose of passing off.10. Mr. Dutt referred us to Section 8 of the Indian Merchandise Marks Act, 1889, and argued that the presumption, if any, had been rebutted by the respondent. It

Mustan Patel Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420, 482, 483, 485, 486, 487 and 489; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 156(3) and 167(5); ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78 and 79

Reported in : (2002)1CALLT455(HC),2002(2)CHN318

false trade description and as such they have committed offences punishable under Sections 420/482/483/485/486/ 487/488 and 489 of the Indian Penal Code.9. on 27.7.94, the Enforcement Branch raided petitioner's shop-room styled as Orient Machinery and Mill Stores and allegedly recovered … P.K. Biswas, J. 1. This is an application under Section 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure flied by Mustan Patel, accused petitioner against

Mamman Khan versus State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]10S.C.R.131

dated 01.08.2023 registered under sections 148, 149, 153A, 379A, 395, 397, 427, 436, 506, 201, 120B, 107 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 4, and • FIR No.150 dated 01.08.2023 registered under sections 148, 149, 153A, 379A, 395, 427, 436, 506, … 134 [2025] 10 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports appellant’s petitions bearing CRM-M-Nos. 61515 and 61516 of 2024, filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 19732) … Court granted an order of stay of further proceedings in S.C. No. 485 / 2024. 7. The principal issue that arises for determination in these