Advanced Search Results

Y. Abraham Ajith and ors. Vs. Inspector of Police, Chennai and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 177 to 186, 482 and 484; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 406, 498A and 506; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR2004SC4286; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)491; 2004CriLJ4180; II(2004)DMC371SC; [2005(1)JCR15(SC)]; JT2004(6)SC497; 2004(7)SCALE374; (2004)8SCC100; 2004(2)LC1435(SC)

in the Court of the concerned magistrate alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (in short the 'Dowry Act'). … opportunity to the parties and, therefore, the factual points raised by parties were not to be adjudicated under Section 484 of the Code.5. In support of the appeal Mr. T.L. Viswanatha Iyer, learned senior counsel, submitted that the

Shivjee Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 141, 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 325, 337 and 447

Reported in : 2008(10)SCALE530; (2008)11SCC631; 2008(2)LC1025(SC); 2008AIRSCW7487; 2008(4)LH(SC)2855

No. 1494 of 2004 were found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') and Section 147. Similar was the conviction recorded in case of Satya Narain Singh, one … are five appellants in the Criminal Appeal No. 494/2004, and there are two appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 484/2006. All the five appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 1494 of 2004 were found guilty of offence punishable under

State vs.sanjay

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

acquitting the respondent-accused in FIR No.458/2014 registered with Police Station, South Rohini under Sections 376(2)(i)(l) & (n) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) and Section 6 of POCSO Act.2. Brief facts of the case, as noticed … + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :10. h May, 2019 CRL.L.P. 484/2018 STATE SANJAY Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State ........ Petitioner versus Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.

Chottey Lal Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 484, 487 and 488; ;Agricultural Produce (Grading and Marking) Act, 1937 - Section 4; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 190, 190(1) and 196(1)

Reported in : AIR1959Cal32

the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and therefore, the provision of Section 488 of the Indian Penal Code as also the provision of Section 4 of the Agricultural Produce Act are void in law.6. I agree … appeared to the Officer to be counterfeit Agmarks.3. The prosecution case is that the appellants committed offence Under Section 484 and also Under Section 488/487 I. P. C. by using such labels on tins containing Ghee and that

Mukesh & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

FIR No. 484/2022 dated 24.06.2022, registered at Police Station Nangloi, Outer District, New Delhi, under Sections 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. The petition is taken up for disposal … Aman, Advocates with R2/Complainant in person.CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 25.03.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [“BNSS”] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

P. Philip Vs. the Director of Enforcement, New Delhi and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 399(3), 435, 438, 484 and 484(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B

Reported in : AIR1976SC1185; 1976CriLJ920; 1976(0)KLT247(SC); (1976)2SCC174; [1976]3SCR532; 1976(8)LC287(SC)

against four accused persons, alleging the commission of offences under Section 120-B, Penal Code and Section 5(1)(aa) and 5(1)(c) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, … Enforcement, New Delhi made a complaint against four accused persons, alleging the commission of offences under Section 120-B, Penal Code and Section 5(1)(aa) and 5(1)(c) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (for short, called the Act) in … revision petition was filed before the Sessions Judge, the old Code was in force, and in view of Section 484 of the New Code it had to be disposed of inaccordance with the old Code.6. As against this,

HarikishIn Ajwani Vs. S.G. Rajadhyaksha and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 104 and 135; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B

Reported in : 1982(2)BomCR502

already as possible. Criminal - proceedings - Sections 104 and 135 of Customs Act, 1962, Section 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 13 of Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - petitioner charged with … the complaint, I do not see any justification to review his decision in exercising of inherent powers under section 484 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.21. Before concluding my judgment, the learned Advocate for the petitioner pointed out

Ram Balak Alias Gauri Shanker Vs. Delhi Administration

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 435; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 484

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi1219

whether trespass for which Ram Balak alias Gauri Shanker, petitioner, has been found guilty under Section 448 of the Indian Penal Code is a criminal trespass or not. (2) Facts relevant for the purpose are these. Dixit Baba had been … determination in this revision under Sections 435 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, read with Sections 484, 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, against the judgment in appeal dated February 7, 1977

Suresh Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2) and 484(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 307

Reported in : AIR1981SC1122; 1981CriLJ746; 1981(1)SCALE543; (1981)2SCC569; [1981]3SCR259; 1981(13)LC784(SC)

will stand but the two sentences will run concurrently. Criminal - murder - Sections 302 and 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant challenged his conviction under Section 302 - whether evidence given by sole eye witness who is … question of sentence, holding that Section 235(2) of the CrPC, 1973 did not, by reason of its Section 484(2)(a), apply to trials which were pending on the date when the new Code came into force. We wish

Amaliammal Vs. Rayarswami and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 484 and 494; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1719

accused is confirmed and the appeal is dismissed. 11. Appeal dismissed. Criminal - bigamy - Section 494 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - prosecution for committing bigamy - accused and alleged second wife Christians - allegation that second marriage conducted … he contracted a second marriage with the second accused. Sundarammal, and therefore, has committed an offence punishable under Section 484, I.P.C. The marriage is said to have been performed in the house of the third accused at Thavasimadai