Advanced Search Results

M. Balakrishna Reddy Vs. Director, Cbi, New Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6(1); Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 7, 9 and 11(1); Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 417, 418, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 482; Business Rule - Rules 12, 13 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 77, 77(2), 166, 166(1), 166(2) and 166(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197

Reported in : AIR2008SC1754; 2008(56)BLJR1575; JT2008(4)SC162; 2008(4)SCALE617; (2008)4SCC409

appellant for offences punishable under Sections 420, 471, 474, 467, 468 and 417 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short). A charge-sheet was filed in the Court of Special Magistrate, Central Bureau of Investigation ('CBI'

Mustaq Ahmed Mohmed HussaIn and Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 415, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 410, 418 and 421

Reported in : AIR1973SC1222; (1973)0GLR610; (1973)1SCC702; [1973]3SCR670

421 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Sections 34, 415, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 511 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal deciding question whether High Court justified in dismissing appellant's appeal against their conviction by Sessions Judge … the Sessions Judge, Jamnagar for offences under Section 420 read with Section 511 and 34, I.P.C. and under Section 474 read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code.2. Both the appellants were charged on five counts in the court

Krishnan Kesavan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 471 and 474; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 215 and 438

Reported in : AIR1957Ker78; 1957CriLJ755

aside the accused's conviction and sentence and acquit him. Criminal - conviction - Sections 471 and 474 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appellant convicted for offence for having possessed of forged document, knowing and intending to use it fraudulently … of the Sessions Court of Trivandrum has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge of that Court under Section 474, I.P.C., for having been in possession of a 'valuable security', to wit, a lease deed, knowing the same

Andhra Bank and anr. Vs. Station House Officer, Pattabhipuram Crime Po ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 167, 205, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 477A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195, 195(1), 463, 465, 468, 471, 475 and 476

Reported in : 1998(2)ALT587; 1995(2)ALT(Cri)587; 1996CriLJ277

allowed. Criminal - interpretation - Sections 167, 205, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 477A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 195, 195 (1), 463, 465, 468, 471, 475 and 476 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - … in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in any Court.' The said section was amended in 1973. Prior to the amendment in 1973, the section reads as follows : 'Section 195(1)(c)

Mohd. Ahmed Khan Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by Its C ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 3(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 109, 120(B), 307, 387, 406, 419, 420, 447, 454, 467, 468, 471, 474, 476 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3); Arms Act - Sections 25(1)

Reported in : 2002(1)ALT431; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)188; 2002CriLJ1962

109, 120 (B), 307, 387, 406, 419, 420, 454, 447, 467, 468, 471, 474, 476 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 156 (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 25 (1) of Arms Act - petition seeking

A.Valluvan. Vs. the State Rep.by Assistant Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Section 420, 465, 468, 474, 120(B)

applications filed, by confirming the orders passed by the Court below. Accordingly, these applications are dismissed. [M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Section 420, 465, 468, 474, 120(B) -- Submissions of the learned counsels appearing for the

Gajjan Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 179 and 182; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 466, 471 and 474

Reported in : AIR1965SC1921; 1965MhLJ774(SC)

Possession of forged document and intending to use it as genuine one - Sections 471 and 474 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appeal against conviction for offence under Sections 471 and 474 - Appellant was owner of truck which … by him the conviction under Section 466 was altered to one under Section 471 but the conviction under Section 474 and the sentences passed on him were maintained, by the Madhya Pradesh High Court.2. Gajjan Singh was the

State of Punjab Vs. Brij Lal Palta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 173, 195, 195(1) and 207A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 182, 193, 211, 385, 408, 467 and 474

Reported in : AIR1969SC355; 1969CriLJ645; [1969]1SCR853

stand quashed. Criminal - Cognizance of offence - Sections 109, 211, 182, 385, 408, 467 and 474 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Respondent was induced to part with sum for purchase of property - Respondent claimed refund of that … of Punjab quashing the proceedings pending against the respondent in the court of a Magistrate at Faridkot under Sections 408, 467, 471, 381, 385, 182, 211, 193 and 109, Indian Penal Code.2. The factual position as it

J. Muthukrishnan and anr., Etc. Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2), 190, 197, 197(1), 227, 306(4)(1), 306(5), 403(I) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120B, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165A, 166, 167, 168, 169, 182, 193, 197, 198, 201, 204, 211, 218, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 263A, 379, 380, 381, 382, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 465, 466, 467 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2), 6 and 6(1); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5, 5(1) and 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2570

420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D and 489-E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860). (These offences are not applicable to the State of Jammu and Kashmir). 2. Offences punishable … ORDER1. All these applications had been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 13 of 1988 (Popularly known

Sashi Mohan Debnath and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 193, 282, 306, 307, 307, 307(1), 307(1)-A, 307(2), 307(3) and 310; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 149, 201, 304, 467, 471 and 474

Reported in : AIR1958SC194; 1958CriLJ303; (1958)36MysLJ(SC)107; [1958]1SCR962

and 310 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Sections 147, 149, 201, 304, 467, 471 and 474 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - whether High Court acted with jurisdiction in convicting or acquitting any of accused who were tried by … accept the verdict of not guilty on the charges framed under section 467 read with section 471 and section 474 I.P.C., and direct that the accused be acquitted.' This decision, in substance, takes the same view as that