Advanced Search Results

Kodati Ramana Alias Venkatarama Rao and ors. Vs. the Station House Off ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3) and 195; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 181, 182, 192, 193, 195(1), 199, 200, 205, 211, 228, 423, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 475 and 476

Reported in : 1991(3)ALT354; 1992CriLJ680

192, 193, 195 (1), 199, 200, 211, 228, 423, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 475 and 476 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - 3rd respondent filed private complaint before Judicial Magistrate against petitioners alleging that petitioners forged agreement of sale … No court shall take cognizance - (a) ...................................... (b)(i) of any offence punishable under any of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely, Ss. 193 - 196 (both inclusive), 199, 200, 205

Sh. S.K. Muttoo and Others Vs. State and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 110, 120-B, 191, 192, 193, 211 and 465; Societies Registration Act, 1860; CCS (CCA) Conduct Rules, 1956 - Rule 11; CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 11

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT394; 2002(61)DRJ146

here. Offence under Section 120--B is relateable to said two offences. Case of forgery punishable under Section 465 IPC is not made out. During the course of arguments the respondent No. 2--complainant was unable to point out … others together with order dated 11th may 2000, is quashed. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482--Quashing of complaint--Accused summoned to face trial of the … registered under the Societies Registration Act, XXI of 1860 at Delhi. The Institute is run by its … the case here. Offence under Section 120--B is relateable to said two offences. Case of forgery punishable under Section 465 IPC is not made out. During the course of arguments the respondent No. 2--complainant was unable to point … memorandum the petitioner No.1 (Director) had declared his intention to impose minor penalty of censure under Rule 11 of CCS (CCA) Conduct Rules, 1956 while

Pankaj Kumar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5 and 5(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 197, 258, 309, 311, 437(2), 468 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 101, 120B, 302, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 477A; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2008SC3077; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)491; 2008CriLJ3944; JT2008(8)SC109; 2008(II)OLR(SC)482; RLW2008(3)SC2368; 2008(9)SCALE760; 2008AIRSCW5165

twelve persons for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 477A, 101 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short `IPC') and Sections 5(1)(c)(d) along with Section 5(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. In

Maruti Nivrutti Navale Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Section 41E; Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), (Cr.P.C) 1908 - Section 438

with the Deccan Police Station, Pune under Sections 420, 465, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which was registered as S.No. 168 of 2011.(h) Against the said complaint, the appellant filed an application bearing

State of Punjab Vs. Nirmal Kaur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 401

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1535; JT2009(8)SC303; 2009(4)LC1878(SC)

On the accusation of commission of offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Act investigation was undertaken, charges

Ketankumar Babulal Patel Vs. Kesarben Jesangji and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 420, 465, 467 and 468; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154(3), 156(3), 190, 200, 202, 203 and 204

Reported in : 2009CriLJ365; [2008(4)JCR94(SC)]; 2008(12)SCALE789; 2008AIRSCW6975; 2008(4)Crimes163

as follows:A complaint alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ahmedabad (Rural) which was numbered … First Class, Ahmedabad (Rural) in Criminal Complaint No. 103 of 2008 is quashed and set aside. Inquiry under Section 156(3) of the Code is ordered. Complaint be registered as an FIR by the officer in charge of

Beena Philipose and anr. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420, 421, 465, 466, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 428

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR363(SC)]; 2006(II)OLR(SC)717; 2006(9)SCALE4; (2006)7SCC414

tried for commission of offence punishable under Section 420, 471, 120B read with Sections 466 and 468 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'Code'). The allegations which led to the trial are essentially to the effect that appellant … I.P.C., 468 I.P.C. and 471 IP.C. No separate sentence is imposed for the offences Under Sections 120B and 465 I.P.C. The sentences shall run concurrently. Set off allowed Under Section 428 Cr.P.C.In appeal, as noted above, the

Col. B.S. Khatri Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 195 and 340; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 172 to 188, 191, 192, 193 to 196, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 205 to 211, 228, 397, 401, 420, 464, 465, 467, 471, 475, 476 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR424; 2004(1)MhLj747

Section 156 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 120-B, 420, 464, 465, 467 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petition filed against Order directing investigation under Section 156 (3) - investigation directed on basis of complaint

N. Damodaran Nair and anr. Vs. State

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 465 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 233, 234, 239, 423(1) and 537; Constitution of India - Article 20(3)

Reported in : AIR1960Ker29; 1960CriLJ75

will stand dismissed. 15. Order accordingly. Criminal - conviction - Sections 34, 114, 419, 467 and 468 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal against conviction for forgery and personification - direct and circumstantial evidence proved guilt of accused - … referred to as accused 1 and accused 2. Accused 1 stands convicted by the learned Sessions Judge under Sections 467, 468 and 419 of the Penal Code read with Sec, 34 and also under Sections 465 and

Abdul Rehman and ors. Vs. K.M.Anees Ul Haq.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 211, 500, 109, 114 rw 34, 406 rw 34, 211, 500, 193 to 196, 199, 200, 205 to 211, 419, 465, 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 195, 482, 195(1)(b), ; Dowry Prohibition Act. - Sections 3, 4;

Reported in : 2011(4)KLT142(SN); 2011(10)SCC696; 2012(1)CTC184; 2012(1)SCC(Cri)93; AIR2012SCW536; 2012CriLJ1060

appellants, alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 211, 500, 109, and 114 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 was barred by the provisions of Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The High Court … parts or stages of the same integral whole. Indeed, the commission of the offences under Sections 205, 419, 465, 467 and 471 of the Penal Code, came to light only when Shri Karandikar, on the basis of