Advanced Search Results

State of Karnataka Vs. Puttaraja

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 228A, 354, 376, 376(1), 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D

Reported in : AIR2004SC433; 2004(3)ALT6(SC); 2004CriLJ579; JT2003(9)SC603; 2003(10)SCALE325; (2004)1SCC475; 2004(1)LC222(SC)

the advance stage of pregnancy.2. We do not propose to mention name of the victim. Section 228-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') makes disclosure of identity of victim of certain offences punishable. Printing or publishing name … was maintained, the sentence was reduced by a learned Single Judge to period of custody already undergone i.e. 46 days. 4. The State of Karnataka questions the propriety of the sentence imposed. According to learned counsel for

Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 446, 451, 475, 475(1) and 482; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 80 and 81; Border Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3 to 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279 and 337; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 9; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125 and 126

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)433; 96(2002)DLT217; 2002(62)DRJ16

to change the decision at their own whims and convenience--Petition disposed of--Border Security Force Act, 1968, Section 80--Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 279/337.;BSF authorities appear to have decided not to produce the accused and to hold the trial in BSF … BSF Act are equivalent to Sections 125 and 126 of the Army Act, 1950. She argued that under Section 46 of the BSF Act, offences under Sections 279/337 IPC with which accused was charged are triable both by

Liyakat Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 367

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1931; JT2008(3)SC143; 2008(3)SCALE108; 2008AIRSCW1678; AIR2008SC1537; 2008CriLJ1931; 2008(2)AICLR551

the accused No. 3. Both of them were convicted for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The trial court, however had acquitted Accused Nos. 2 and 4 namely Riyasat and … for life to Zahira and the accused No. 3. Both of them were convicted for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The trial court, however had … Reference No. 2 of 2004 and two Criminal Appeal Nos. 45 and 46 of 2002. The two criminal appeals were filed by Liyakat the present

Syed Aref S/O Syed Omer Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 224; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 46

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR630

Fine, if paid, be refunded. Rule is made absolute accordingly. Criminal - lawful custody - Section 224 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 46 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - conviction sought on allegation that petitioner escaped from lawful

The Management of Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi Vs. Bhopal Singh Pa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceLabour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Section 302; Reserve Bank of India (Staff) Regulations, 1948 - Regulation 46(1)(3)(4), 25; Industrial Disputes Act - Section 33-C(2)

Reported in : AIR1994SC552; I(1994)BC379(SC); [1994(68)FLR22]; JT1993(6)SC266; 1994LabIC80; (1994)ILLJ642SC; 1993(4)SCALE360; (1994)1SCC541; [1993]Supp3SCR586; 1994(1)SLJ147(SC); 1994(1)

however, be no order as to costs. - [ P.B. Sawant,; S. Mohan and; S.P. Bharucha, JJ.] - Indian Penal Code, (IPC) 1860 - Section 302; Reserve Bank of India (Staff) Regulations, 1948 - Regulation 46(1)(3)(4), 25; Industrial Disputes

Parvinderjit Singh and anr. Vs. State (U.T. Chandigarh) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Banking Regulations Act, 1956; Companies Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 46(1), 437(3), 438, 439 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406 and 420

Reported in : 2008(57)BLJR203; 2009(1)MPHT363(SC); 2008(13)SCALE711

FIR No. 73 dated 15.4.2008 registered in respect of offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') in Police Station, Sector 3, Chandigarh, in essence the prayer was for grant of … of learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Though the appellants had filed application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code') praying for quashing the proceedings in … (See: Gur Baksh Singh v. State of Punjab : 1980CriLJ1125 ). Section 46(1) of the Code, which deals with how arrests are to be made,

Miss Kamalini Manmade Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1967)69BOMLR512

rate in regard to criminal prosecutions for 'defamation the law was to be found in Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code and in view of such codification of law of defamation in India the English common law rule about … inapplicable to the circumstances of this country, and that, whatever may have been the rule applied prior to 1860, the Legislature in introducing the Penal Code in that year did not apply the rule of English Law … later Division Bench ruling reported in Govind Ramchandra v. Gangadhar Mahadeo (1943) 46 Bom. L.R. 417. In that case allegations were made in a petition

D.K. Ganesh Babu Vs. P.T. Manokaran and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 46(1), 437, 437(3), 438 and 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B

Reported in : AIR2007SC1450; 2007CriLJ1827; I(2007)DMC340SC; JT2007(3)SC572; 2007(3)SCALE445; (2007)4SCC434

suicide and the accused-respondent Nos. 1 to 3 apprehended arrest for the alleged offence under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961(in short the 'Act').3. The application … effective at the very moment of arrest.(See: Gur Baksh Singh v. State of Punjab : 1980CriLJ1125 ). Section 46(1) of the Code, which deals with how arrests are to be made, provides that in making an arrest

B.V. Mokashi Vs. Mysore State Road Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Electricity Supply Act, 1948; Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 14(3), 19, 34 and 45(2); Companies Act; Life Insurance Corporation Act - Sections 11(2); Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947; Land Acquisition Act; General Clauses Act - Sections 3; Mysore Financial Code, 1958 - Rule 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13(2), 14, 16, 19(1), 31, 46, 226, 298, 311(2) and 367

Reported in : (1974)ILLJ153Kant; (1973)2MysLJ76

Act, 1947; Land Acquisition Act; General Clauses Act - Section 3; Mysore Financial Code, 1958 - Rule 2; Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 21; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13(2), 14, 16, 19(1), 31, 46, 226, 298, 311(2)

Mangat Rai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 29, 29(2) to 29(4) and 46; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 353 and 506(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417

Reported in : 1970MPLJ602(SC); (1969)2SCC697; [1970]2SCR151; [1970]26STC1(SC)

and 46 of Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959 and Sections 353, 362 and 506 (1) of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sales Tax Inspector (STI) along with two persons went to appellant's shop for inspecting account books - … 'I noticed that 'Business transaction' was written there-in.3. The Magistrate who tried the case convicted the appellant under Section 353 and under Section 506(1) of the Indian Penal Code.4. The learned Sessions Judge held that the Sales