Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 450 · Page 1 of about 409 results (0.055 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 24 2005

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Munna Choubey and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-24-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109(1), 375, 376, 376(1), 376(2), 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D and 450; Constitution of India - Article 136; Criminal Law; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 375, 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D

Reported in : AIR2005SC682; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)510; 2005(1)BLJR330; (2005)3CALLT62(SC); 2005CriLJ913; JT2005(2)SC122; (2005)2SCC710

aspects is unnecessary.3. The respondents faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 450, 376(1)/109(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') The respondent-accused Munna was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven … to Section 376(1). He was also sentenced to undergo imprisonment of five years for the offence punishable under Section 450 IPC. Respondent-accused Ghanshyam was similarly sentenced. Both the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. The conviction was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2008

Vinay D. Nagar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-03-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 32(1) to 32(8) and 145; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302, 323, 328, 342, 364, 365, 450 and 456; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 162, 162(1), 164 and 313

Reported in : AIR2008SC1558; (2008)2CALLT56(SC); 2008CriLJ1907; JT2008(3)SC200; 2008(3)SCALE315; (2008)5SCC597; 2008AIRSCW1709; 2008CriLJ1907; 2008(3)AICLR471; 2008(4)LH(SC)2602

No. 990/2002, which upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 364, 450, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'I.P.C.').2. The relevant facts of the case as per the prosecution are that Kalu (the deceased) … Jaipur Bench in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 990/2002, which upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 364, 450, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'I.P.C.').2. The relevant facts of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2004

NaraIn Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-04-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 302, 304, 307, 323, 324 and 450

Reported in : JT2004(2)SC270; 2004(3)MPHT323; 2004(2)SCALE197; (2004)2SCC455

the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which held his conviction for offence punishable under Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC') to be in order. Consequentially, sentence of eight years rigorous imprisonment and fine proposed … trial including the appellant for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 148, 302/149, 307/149, 324/149, 323/149 and 450 IPC. The Trial Court held that the accusations were not established. Against rest of the seven while it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 15 2008

Moti Lal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-15-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376, 376(1), 450 and 452; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 118

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3543; JT2008(8)SC271; 2008(10)SCALE81; (2008)11SCC20

Court at Jabalpur upholding the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Sections 450 and 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentence of five years and seven years rigorous imprisonment respectively and fine of … Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 - High Court upheld the conviction of appellant under Section 450 and 376(1) of IPC - Hence, present appeal - Appellant submitted that uncorroborated version of the prosecutrix should

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2009

State of Punjab Vs. Mohinder Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-27-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 302, 324 and 450

Reported in : 2009(3)SCALE324

respondents was found guilty of offences punishable under Sections 302, 450, 324, 148 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). Learned Additional Sessions Judge Gurdaspur has found the accused guilty and sentenced them as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2001

Santosh Kumar Pachori Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-16-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 376 and 450

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2981; 2001(3)MPHT96; 2001(3)MPLJ679

Prasad, J. 1. Santosh Kumar Pachori was put on trial for offence under Sections 450 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. First Addl. Sessions Judge, Hoshangabad by his judgment dated 20th December, 1988 passed in Sessions Trial No. 104/87, … for life under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. He is also found guilty for offence under Section 450 of the Indian Penal Code.20. To put the record straight, it is relevant here to state that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2006

Sudhari @ Shivadhari Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Jul-31-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 450 and 376

Reported in : 2006(4)MPHT49(CG)

if not required in any other case. Criminal - Testimony of Prosecutrix - Sections 376 and 450 of Indian Penal Code 1860(IPC) - Appellant were alleged with commission of offence of rape on prosecutrix when parents of prosecutrix were … to rigorous imprisonment for seven years under Section 376, IPC and to rigorous imprisonment for three years under Section 450, IPC.2. Briefly stated the prosecution story is that on 18-3-2001, the prosecutrix aged about 16 years was alone

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1996

Padigi Narasimha Vs. State

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-06-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376 and 450; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 154(1), 162, 162(1) and 313; Evidence Act - Sections 145

Reported in : 1996(2)ALD585; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)555; 1996CriLJ2997

required in any other case. 29. Appeal partly allowed. Criminal - rape - Sections 376 and 450 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 154, 154 (1), 162, 162 (1) and 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 145 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1994

S.A. Shajahan and Others Vs. R. Kahdar Beg

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-18-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307, 450 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 97 and 482

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1282

is dismissed. 9. Petition dismissed. Criminal - quashing of complaint - Sections 307, 450 and 452 of Indian Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 97 and 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - habeas corpus petition for quashing complaint - petitioner … As pointed out by the Supreme Court itself in the above referred to case in a petition under section 97 of the present Code of Criminal Procedure, all the issues of fact can be tried, unlike in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1984

Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-29-1984

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985CriLJ440

120B, 121, 364, 365, 367, 368, 392, 394, 395, 396, 399, 412, 431, 436, 449 and 450 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, and Sections 25, 26, 27, 28, … eyewitness to it. The petitioner in these circumstances cannot be termed as a 'terrorist' within the meaning of Section 2(1)(h) of the Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984 for it cannot be said at this stage

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial